Davis A M, Perruccio A V, Canizares M, Hawker G A, Roos E M, Maillefert J-F, Lohmander L S
Division of Health Care and Outcomes Research, Toronto Western Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Jul;17(7):843-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Jan 31.
To evaluate the internal consistency of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short-form (HOOS-PS) and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short-form (KOOS-PS) in total hip replacement (THR) and total knee (TKR) replacement. Construct validity and responsiveness were compared to the Western Ontario McMaster Universities' Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Likert 3.0 physical function (PF) subscale and the PF excluding the items in the short measures (PF-exclusions).
Participants completed the full HOOS or KOOS, measures of fatigue, anxiety, depression and the Chronic Pain Grade (CPG) pre-surgery and the HOOS or KOOS 6 months post-surgery. Internal consistency for the HOOS-PS and KOOS-PS was calculated using Cronbach's alpha. For construct validity, it was hypothesized that correlations between the HOOS-PS or KOOS-PS and PF and PF-exclusions with fatigue, CPG, anxiety and depression and HOOS/KOOS pain scales would differ by magnitudes of <0.1. Standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated for the HOOS-PS, KOOS-PS, PF and PF-exclusions and hypothesized to be >1.
The THR group (n=201) had a mean age of 62.3 years; 53.2% were female. The TKR group (n=248) had a mean age of 64.5 years; 63.7% were female. Cronbach's alpha was 0.79 and 0.89 for the HOOS-PS and KOOS-PS, respectively, confirming that the measures represented a homogeneous construct. The correlation of the HOOS-PS to the PF and PF-exclusions was 0.90 and 0.86, respectively; r=0.90 (PF) and r=0.85 (PF-exclusions) for the KOOS-PS. The results supported the construct validity hypotheses. For THR, the SRM was 1.5, 1.7 and 1.7 for the HOOS-PS, PF and PF-exclusions; for TKR, the SRM was 1.4, 1.5 and 1.7, respectively.
The short HOOS-PS and KOOS-PS represent homogenous short measures of PF with similar construct validity and responsiveness to the 17-item PF. The HOOS-PS and KOOS-PS are parsimonious, valid and responsive for evaluating PF in THR and TKR.
评估髋关节功能障碍与骨关节炎疗效评分-身体功能简表(HOOS-PS)和膝关节损伤与骨关节炎疗效评分-身体功能简表(KOOS-PS)在全髋关节置换术(THR)和全膝关节置换术(TKR)中的内部一致性。将结构效度和反应度与西安大略麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)李克特3.0身体功能(PF)子量表以及排除简短量表中项目后的PF(PF-排除项)进行比较。
参与者在术前完成完整的HOOS或KOOS、疲劳、焦虑、抑郁和慢性疼痛分级(CPG)测量,以及术后6个月的HOOS或KOOS测量。使用克朗巴哈系数计算HOOS-PS和KOOS-PS的内部一致性。对于结构效度,假设HOOS-PS或KOOS-PS与PF和PF-排除项与疲劳、CPG、焦虑、抑郁以及HOOS/KOOS疼痛量表之间的相关性差异幅度<0.1。计算HOOS-PS、KOOS-PS、PF和PF-排除项的标准化反应均值(SRM),并假设其>1。
THR组(n = 201)平均年龄为62.3岁;53.2%为女性。TKR组(n = 248)平均年龄为64.5岁;63.7%为女性。HOOS-PS和KOOS-PS的克朗巴哈系数分别为0.79和0.89,证实这些测量代表了一个同质结构。HOOS-PS与PF和PF-排除项的相关性分别为0.90和0.86;KOOS-PS与PF的相关性r = 0.90,与PF-排除项的相关性r = 0.85。结果支持结构效度假设。对于THR,HOOS-PS、PF和PF-排除项的SRM分别为1.5、1.7和1.7;对于TKR,SRM分别为1.4、1.5和1.7。
简短的HOOS-PS和KOOS-PS代表了PF的同质简短测量,其结构效度和反应度与17项PF相似。HOOS-PS和KOOS-PS在评估THR和TKR中的PF方面简洁、有效且具有反应度。