Jeon Hong Jun, Kim So Yeon, Park Keun Young, Lee Jae Whan, Huh Seung Kon
Department of Neurosurgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 150, Seongan-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 134-701, Republic of Korea.
Department of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Stroke Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemon-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Republic of Korea.
Neurosurg Rev. 2016 Apr;39(2):215-23; discussion 223-4. doi: 10.1007/s10143-015-0671-x. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
Endovascular coiling is widely used for many cerebral aneurysms; however, in cases of middle cerebral artery bifurcation (MCBIF) aneurysms, it is associated with a higher incidence of unfavorable outcomes compared to microsurgical clippings. In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate the outcomes of microsurgical clipping for unruptured MCBIF aneurysms and determine the ideal clipping methods for different aneurysm subtypes. From January 2011 to December 2013, 203 aneurysms with saccular shape (<25 mm) were treated by an experienced neurosurgeon. Depending on the involvement of the aneurysmal thin wall, the aneurysm neck was classified as follows: subtype I, limited bifurcation; subtype II, progressed to M1 trunk; subtype III, progressed to M2 trunk; subtype IV, progressed to M1 and one M2 trunk; and subtype V, progressed to M1 and two M2 trunks. The clipping methods included simple, sliding, interlocking, or mixed approaches. Aneurysm clippings were accomplished without any morbidity in all cases, and seven cases had a minimal neck remnant. The following clipping methods were predominantly used: subtype I, simple (90.2%) and sliding (8.8%) (mean = 1.2 clips); subtype II, interlocking (51.4%), sliding (30.0%), mixed (15.7%), and simple (2.9%) (2.4 clips); subtype III, simple (57.5%) and sliding (42.5%) (1.5 clips); subtype IV, interlocking (64.3%) (2.1 clips), simple (10.7%), sliding (14.3%), and mixed (10.7%); and subtype V, interlocking (50.0%), sliding (35.7%), and mixed (14.3%) methods with multiple clips (2.8 clips). If an appropriate clipping method is selected according to the neck classification, satisfactory surgical obliteration can be achieved for unruptured MCBIF aneurysms without morbidity.
血管内栓塞术广泛应用于多种脑动脉瘤;然而,对于大脑中动脉分叉部(MCBIF)动脉瘤,与显微外科夹闭术相比,其不良预后的发生率更高。在这项回顾性研究中,我们旨在探讨未破裂MCBIF动脉瘤的显微外科夹闭术的疗效,并确定不同动脉瘤亚型的理想夹闭方法。2011年1月至2013年12月,一位经验丰富的神经外科医生治疗了203个囊状(<25mm)动脉瘤。根据动脉瘤薄壁的累及情况,将动脉瘤颈部分类如下:I型,局限于分叉部;II型,延伸至M1主干;III型,延伸至M2主干;IV型,延伸至M1和一个M2主干;V型,延伸至M1和两个M2主干。夹闭方法包括单纯夹闭、滑动夹闭、联锁夹闭或混合夹闭。所有病例的动脉瘤夹闭均未出现任何并发症,7例有极小的残颈。主要采用的夹闭方法如下:I型,单纯夹闭(90.2%)和滑动夹闭(8.8%)(平均=1.2枚夹子);II型,联锁夹闭(51.4%)、滑动夹闭(30.0%)、混合夹闭(15.7%)和单纯夹闭(2.9%)(2.4枚夹子);III型,单纯夹闭(57.5%)和滑动夹闭(42.5%)(1.5枚夹子);IV型,联锁夹闭(64.3%)(2.1枚夹子)、单纯夹闭(10.7%)、滑动夹闭(14.3%)和混合夹闭(10.7%);V型,联锁夹闭(50.0%)、滑动夹闭(35.7%)和混合夹闭(14.3%)方法,使用多枚夹子(2.8枚夹子)。如果根据颈部分类选择合适的夹闭方法,对于未破裂的MCBIF动脉瘤可实现满意的手术闭塞且无并发症。