Woo Irene, Seifert Sara, Hendricks Dacia, Jamshidi Roxanne M, Burke Anne E, Fox Michelle C
Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Institution, 600 North Wolfe Street, Phipps 279 Baltimore, MD, USA, 21287.
Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Institution, 600 North Wolfe Street, Phipps 279 Baltimore, MD, USA, 21287.
Contraception. 2015 Dec;92(6):532-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
Studies show immediate postpartum (PP) insertion increases use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices (IUDs). Our objective was to compare the satisfaction and continuation rates of the two types of devices at 6 months and 1 year following PP insertion.
We enrolled 133 women in a prospective cohort study following immediate PP insertion of an implant or IUD at two academic hospitals during 8 months of 2011. Subjects completed an enrollment survey during hospital admission and a follow-up phone survey 6 months and 1 year PP.
At 6 months PP, 72% of subjects provided follow-up information. Implant users were more likely to be using the originally-placed device (40/41, 98% vs. 45/55, 82%, p=0.02); nine women reported IUD expulsions. When accounting for replacement of expelled IUDs, IUD continuation at 6 months was 89% yielding similar continuation rates between groups (p=0.12). At 1 year PP, 51% provided follow-up. Of those, 82% still had a LARC method in place with similar continuation by device type (84% for implants, 81% for IUDs, p=0.96). Overall, satisfaction was similarly high in both groups.
Due to IUD expulsion, implants had a higher continuation rate than IUDs six months following immediate PP insertion. After replacement of expelled IUDs, continuation and satisfaction were similar for both devices at 6 months and 1 year.
Placement of implants and IUDs immediately PP can lead to high satisfaction. Despite early IUD expulsions, continuation rates were similar to those placed outside of the immediate PP period.
研究表明产后立即植入避孕植入物和宫内节育器(IUD)的使用率会增加。我们的目的是比较产后立即植入这两种装置在6个月和1年时的满意度和续用率。
2011年的8个月期间,我们在两家学术医院对133名产后立即植入避孕植入物或宫内节育器的妇女进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。受试者在入院时完成了一项入组调查,并在产后6个月和1年接受了随访电话调查。
产后6个月时,72%的受试者提供了随访信息。植入物使用者更有可能仍在使用最初放置的装置(40/41,98%对45/55,82%,p=0.02);9名妇女报告宫内节育器排出。在考虑更换排出的宫内节育器后,6个月时宫内节育器的续用率为89%,两组之间的续用率相似(p=0.12)。产后1年时,51%的人提供了随访信息。其中,82%的人仍在使用长效可逆避孕方法,不同装置类型的续用情况相似(植入物为84%,宫内节育器为81%,p=0.96)。总体而言,两组的满意度都同样高。
由于宫内节育器排出,产后立即植入避孕植入物在产后6个月时的续用率高于宫内节育器。在更换排出的宫内节育器后,两种装置在6个月和1年时的续用率和满意度相似。
产后立即植入避孕植入物和宫内节育器可带来高满意度。尽管早期有宫内节育器排出,但续用率与在产后非立即植入期植入的情况相似。