Fleming D, Davie J, Glasier A
Edinburgh Healthcare National Health Service Trust, Family Planning and Well Woman Services, Scotland.
Contraception. 1998 Jan;57(1):19-21. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(97)00202-3.
Following adverse widespread publicity in the United Kingdom and the United States, it is commonly believed that discontinuation rates for the contraceptive implants Norplant in the UK are high. We have compared discontinuation rates between new intrauterine device (IUD) users (253 women) and new Norplant implant users (502 women) over 33 months following the introduction of Norplant implants among a population of women attending the same clinic and counseled in the same manner by the same group of providers. Women choosing the IUD were slightly older and were more likely to be changing their contraceptive method because of dissatisfaction with their current method. Nor plant implant users were more likely to have completed their families. Continuation rates for Norplant implants were significantly higher than for IUD at 12, 18, and 24 months after insertion. At 24 months, continuation rates for Norplant implants were 72% compared with rates of 55% for IUD users. Higher continuation rates may be related more to factors associated with the providers than with the users of these two long-acting methods.
在英国和美国出现广泛的负面宣传之后,人们普遍认为英国避孕植入剂诺普兰的停用率很高。我们比较了在同一诊所就诊且由同一组医护人员以相同方式提供咨询的女性群体中,新使用宫内节育器(IUD)的253名女性和新使用诺普兰植入剂的502名女性在诺普兰植入剂引入后的33个月内的停用率。选择IUD的女性年龄稍大一些,且更有可能因为对当前避孕方法不满意而更换避孕方式。使用诺普兰植入剂的女性更有可能已完成生育。在插入后的12个月、18个月和24个月时,诺普兰植入剂的续用率显著高于IUD。在24个月时,诺普兰植入剂的续用率为72%,而IUD使用者的续用率为55%。较高的续用率可能更多地与医护人员相关的因素有关,而非与这两种长效避孕方法的使用者有关。