Gabay Yafit, Holt Lori L
Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Psychology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Psychology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Cortex. 2015 Dec;73:131-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
Developmental dyslexia is commonly thought to arise from specific phonological impairments. However, recent evidence is consistent with the possibility that phonological impairments arise as symptoms of an underlying dysfunction of procedural learning. The nature of the link between impaired procedural learning and phonological dysfunction is unresolved. Motivated by the observation that speech processing involves the acquisition of procedural category knowledge, the present study investigates the possibility that procedural learning impairment may affect phonological processing by interfering with the typical course of phonetic category learning. The present study tests this hypothesis while controlling for linguistic experience and possible speech-specific deficits by comparing auditory category learning across artificial, nonlinguistic sounds among dyslexic adults and matched controls in a specialized first-person shooter videogame that has been shown to engage procedural learning. Nonspeech auditory category learning was assessed online via within-game measures and also with a post-training task involving overt categorization of familiar and novel sound exemplars. Each measure reveals that dyslexic participants do not acquire procedural category knowledge as effectively as age- and cognitive-ability matched controls. This difference cannot be explained by differences in perceptual acuity for the sounds. Moreover, poor nonspeech category learning is associated with slower phonological processing. Whereas phonological processing impairments have been emphasized as the cause of dyslexia, the current results suggest that impaired auditory category learning, general in nature and not specific to speech signals, could contribute to phonological deficits in dyslexia with subsequent negative effects on language acquisition and reading. Implications for the neuro-cognitive mechanisms of developmental dyslexia are discussed.
发育性阅读障碍通常被认为源于特定的语音障碍。然而,最近的证据表明,语音障碍可能是程序性学习潜在功能障碍的症状。程序性学习受损与语音功能障碍之间联系的本质尚未明确。鉴于语音处理涉及程序性类别知识的习得,本研究探讨程序性学习障碍可能通过干扰语音类别学习的典型进程来影响语音处理的可能性。本研究通过比较诵读困难成年人与匹配对照组在一款专门的第一人称射击电子游戏中对人工非语言声音的听觉类别学习,来检验这一假设,同时控制语言经验和可能的语音特异性缺陷,该游戏已被证明能促进程序性学习。非语音听觉类别学习通过游戏内测量以及训练后涉及对熟悉和新颖声音样本进行公开分类的任务进行在线评估。每项测量都表明,诵读困难参与者不如年龄和认知能力匹配的对照组那样有效地获取程序性类别知识。这种差异不能用对声音的感知敏锐度差异来解释。此外,非语音类别学习能力差与语音处理速度较慢有关。虽然语音处理障碍一直被强调为诵读困难的原因,但目前的结果表明,听觉类别学习受损,其本质是一般性的而非特定于语音信号,可能导致诵读困难中的语音缺陷,进而对语言习得和阅读产生负面影响。本文还讨论了对发育性阅读障碍神经认知机制的启示。