J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Jun 1;57(3):1069-77. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/13-0020).
A phonological deficit is thought to affect most individuals with developmental dyslexia. The present study addresses whether the phonological deficit is caused by difficulties with perceptual learning of fine acoustic details.
A demanding test of nonverbal auditory memory, "noise learning," was administered to both adults with dyslexia and control adult participants. On each trial, listeners had to decide whether a stimulus was a 1-s noise token or 2 abutting presentations of the same 0.5-s noise token (repeated noise). Without the listener's knowledge, the exact same noise tokens were presented over many trials. An improved ability to perform the task for such "reference" noises reflects learning of their acoustic details.
Listeners with dyslexia did not differ from controls in any aspect of the task, qualitatively or quantitatively. They required the same amount of training to achieve discrimination of repeated from nonrepeated noises, and they learned the reference noises as often and as rapidly as the control group. However, they did show all the hallmarks of dyslexia, including a well-characterized phonological deficit.
The data did not support the hypothesis that deficits in basic auditory processing or nonverbal learning and memory are the cause of the phonological deficit in dyslexia.
人们认为语音缺陷会影响大多数发育性阅读障碍者。本研究旨在探讨语音缺陷是否是由于对细微声音细节的感知学习困难所致。
对患有阅读障碍的成年人和对照组成年人进行了一项要求很高的非言语听觉记忆测试,即“噪声学习”。在每次试验中,听众必须判断刺激是 1 秒的噪声令牌还是相同 0.5 秒噪声令牌的 2 个相邻呈现(重复噪声)。在听众不知情的情况下,许多试验中都会呈现完全相同的噪声令牌。对于这种“参考”噪声,如果能够更好地执行任务,则反映出对其声音细节的学习。
在任务的任何方面,包括定性和定量方面,诵读困难者与对照组都没有差异。他们需要相同的训练量才能区分重复和非重复的噪声,并且他们像对照组一样经常且快速地学习参考噪声。但是,他们确实表现出阅读障碍的所有特征,包括明显的语音缺陷。
数据不支持基本听觉处理或非言语学习和记忆缺陷是阅读障碍语音缺陷原因的假设。