Thès André, Klouche Shahnaz, Ferrand Mathieu, Hardy Philippe, Bauer Thomas
Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ile-de-France Ouest, AP-HP, 9 Avenue du Général de Gaulle, 92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
UFR des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78035, Versailles, France.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Apr;24(4):985-90. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3804-4. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
An anatomical study was performed to assess the feasibility of arthroscopic visualization of the lateral ligaments of the ankle.
The fibular, talar and calcanear insertions of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) and calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) were identified by standard arthroscopy portals. After dissection of the ATFL and CFL, bone tunnels were created at the estimated centres of their footprints. Dissection was then performed to identify the footprints and their position in relation to bony landmarks. The distance from the real centre of the footprint to the corresponding tunnel entrance was measured.
Fourteen fresh frozen ankles were included. The ATFL and CFL were identified in all cases. The centre of the fibular ATFL footprint was found to be 16.1 ± 3.5 mm from the tip of the fibula, and the talar footprint was 18.4 ± 2.8 mm from the apex of the lateral talar process. The centre of the fibular CFL footprint was 4.2 ± 0.8 mm from the tip of the fibula, and the calcaneal footprint was 18.4 ± 2.5 mm from the fibular process of the calcaneum. The fibular tunnel was 2.9 ± 3 mm proximally from the centre of the ATFL fibular footprint, the talar tunnel was 4.4 ± 3.2 mm proximally from the centre of the talar footprint, and the calcaneal tunnel was 3.3 ± 2.8 mm too anterior from the CFL calcaneal footprint. No iatrogenic lesions were noted.
Arthroscopic identification of the ATFL, CFL and their corresponding footprints can be considered safe and reliable. Tunnels entrances, in preparation for arthroscopic ligament reconstruction, are precisely positioned. Arthroscopic anatomical ligament reconstruction is a feasible option.
进行一项解剖学研究,以评估踝关节外侧韧带关节镜可视化的可行性。
通过标准关节镜入路确定距腓前韧带(ATFL)和跟腓韧带(CFL)的腓骨、距骨和跟骨附着点。在解剖ATFL和CFL后,在其预计的足迹中心创建骨隧道。然后进行解剖以确定足迹及其相对于骨性标志的位置。测量从足迹实际中心到相应隧道入口的距离。
纳入14个新鲜冷冻踝关节。所有病例均识别出ATFL和CFL。发现腓骨ATFL足迹中心距腓骨尖端16.1±3.5mm,距骨足迹距距骨外侧突顶点18.4±2.8mm。腓骨CFL足迹中心距腓骨尖端4.2±0.8mm,跟骨足迹距跟骨腓骨突18.4±2.5mm。腓骨隧道距ATFL腓骨足迹中心近端2.9±3mm,距骨隧道距距骨足迹中心近端4.4±3.2mm,跟骨隧道距CFL跟骨足迹前方3.3±2.8mm。未发现医源性损伤。
关节镜下识别ATFL、CFL及其相应足迹可被认为是安全可靠的。为关节镜韧带重建准备的隧道入口定位精确。关节镜解剖韧带重建是一种可行的选择。