Gavic Lidia, Gorseta Kristina, Glavina Domagoj, Czarnecka Beata, Nicholson John W
School of Dental Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia.
Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2015 Oct;26(10):249. doi: 10.1007/s10856-015-5578-0. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
Under clinical conditions, conventional glass-ionomer dental cements can be cured by application of heat from dental cure lamps, which causes acceleration in the setting. In order for this to be successful, such heat must be able to spread sufficiently through the cement to enhance cure, but not transmit heat so effectively that the underlying dental pulp of the tooth is damaged. The current study was aimed at measuring heat transfer properties of modern restorative glass-ionomers to determine the extent to which they meet these twin requirements. Three commercial glass ionomer cements (Ionofil Molar, Ketac Molar and Equia™ Fill) were used in association with three different light emitting diode cure lamps designed for clinical use. In addition, for each cement, one set of specimens was allowed to cure without application of a lamp. Temperature changes were measured at three different depths (2, 3 and 4 mm) after cure times of 20, 40 and 60 s. The difference among the tested groups was evaluated by ANOVA (P < 0.05) and post hoc Newman-Keuls test. All brands of glass-ionomer showed a small inherent setting exotherm in the absence of heat irradiation, but much greater temperature increases when exposed to the cure lamp. However, temperature rises did not exceed 12.9 °C. Application of the cure lamp led to the establishment of a temperature gradient throughout each specimen. Differences were typically significant (P < 0.05) and did not reflect the nominal power of the lamps, because those lamps have variable cooling systems, and are designed to optimize light output, not heating effect. Because the thermal conductivity of glass-ionomers is low, temperature rises at 4 mm depths were much lower than at 2 mm. At no time did the temperature rise sufficiently to cause concern about potential damage to the pulp.
在临床条件下,传统的玻璃离子水门汀牙科粘固剂可通过牙科固化灯加热进行固化,这会加速凝固过程。为使此方法成功,该热量必须能够充分透过粘固剂以促进固化,但又不能有效地传递热量以至于损伤牙齿下方的牙髓。本研究旨在测量现代修复用玻璃离子材料的热传递特性,以确定它们在多大程度上满足这两个要求。三种市售玻璃离子水门汀(Ionofil Molar、Ketac Molar和Equia™ Fill)与三种设计用于临床的不同发光二极管固化灯联合使用。此外,对于每种水门汀,有一组试样在不使用灯的情况下进行固化。在20、40和60秒的固化时间后,在三个不同深度(2、3和4毫米)测量温度变化。通过方差分析(P < 0.05)和事后纽曼 - 基尔斯检验评估测试组之间的差异。所有品牌的玻璃离子材料在无热辐射时都显示出较小的固有凝固放热,但在暴露于固化灯时温度升高幅度更大。然而,温度升高不超过12.9℃。使用固化灯导致每个试样中形成温度梯度。差异通常具有显著性(P < 0.05),且不反映灯的标称功率,因为这些灯具有可变的冷却系统,并且设计用于优化光输出而非加热效果。由于玻璃离子材料的热导率较低,4毫米深度处的温度升高远低于2毫米处。温度从未升高到足以引起对牙髓潜在损伤担忧的程度。