• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者的成本与疗效——一项全国性多中心试验的结果

Costs and outcomes of treating chronic hepatitis C patients in routine care - results from a nationwide multicenter trial.

作者信息

Stahmeyer J T, Krauth C, Bert F, Pfeiffer-Vornkahl H, Alshuth U, Hüppe D, Mauss S, Rossol S

机构信息

Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt/M, Germany.

出版信息

J Viral Hepat. 2016 Feb;23(2):105-15. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12471. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1111/jvh.12471
PMID:26411532
Abstract

Viral hepatitis is a major public health problem affecting millions of people worldwide. Long-term consequences are the development of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of the study was to assess outcomes and costs of treating patients with chronic hepatitis C in clinical practice in Germany. We carried out a prospective noninterventional study. Information on treatment outcomes, resource utilization and quality of life was provided by 281 physicians throughout Germany. Data of 3708 monoinfected HCV-patients treated between 2008 and 2011 were analysed. Therapy consisted of peginterferon/ribavirin. Mean age of patients was 43.7 years, 60.3% were male and estimated duration of infection was 13.6 years. Predominantly genotype 1 (61.3%) or 3 (28.5%) infections were observed. Sustained viral response (SVR)-rates in most frequently observed genotypes were 49.2% in GT-1 and 61.9% in GT-3 treatment-naive patients (Relapser: GT-1: 35.3% and GT-3: 57.3%; Nonresponder: GT-1: 25.0% and GT-3: 33.3%). Average treatment costs were lowest in treatment-naive patients (€18 965) and higher in patients who failed previous treatments (relapsers: €24 753; nonresponders: €19 511). Differences according to genotype were observed. Average costs per SVR in treatment-naive patients were €44 744 for GT-1 and €22 218 for GT-3. Treatment was associated with a decrease in quality of life; post-treatment quality of life was higher in patients achieving SVR. Our insight on real-life treatment outcomes and costs can serve as a reference for a comparison with other treatments. There is high need for short-term and long-term cost-effectiveness analysis in real-life settings as newly introduced treatment strategies with direct acting antivirals result in high SVR-rates but are more costly.

摘要

病毒性肝炎是一个影响全球数百万人的重大公共卫生问题。其长期后果是发展为肝硬化和肝细胞癌。本研究的目的是评估德国临床实践中慢性丙型肝炎患者的治疗结果和成本。我们开展了一项前瞻性非干预性研究。德国各地的281名医生提供了有关治疗结果、资源利用和生活质量的信息。分析了2008年至2011年间接受治疗的3708名单一感染丙型肝炎病毒患者的数据。治疗方案为聚乙二醇干扰素/利巴韦林。患者的平均年龄为43.7岁,60.3%为男性,估计感染持续时间为13.6年。主要观察到基因型1(61.3%)或基因型3(28.5%)感染。在最常观察到的基因型中,初治患者的持续病毒学应答(SVR)率在基因型1中为49.2%,在基因型3中为61.9%(复发者:基因型1为35.3%,基因型3为57.3%;无应答者:基因型1为25.0%,基因型3为33.3%)。平均治疗成本在初治患者中最低(18965欧元),在先前治疗失败的患者中较高(复发者:24753欧元;无应答者:19511欧元)。观察到了基因型之间的差异。初治患者中每例SVR的平均成本在基因型1中为44744欧元,在基因型3中为22218欧元。治疗与生活质量下降相关;实现SVR的患者治疗后的生活质量更高。我们对实际治疗结果和成本的洞察可为与其他治疗方法进行比较提供参考。由于新引入的直接作用抗病毒药物治疗策略导致高SVR率但成本更高,因此在实际环境中对短期和长期成本效益分析的需求很高。

相似文献

1
Costs and outcomes of treating chronic hepatitis C patients in routine care - results from a nationwide multicenter trial.常规治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者的成本与疗效——一项全国性多中心试验的结果
J Viral Hepat. 2016 Feb;23(2):105-15. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12471. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
2
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of the treatment of chronic hepatitis C with peginterferon alfa-2a or peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin in Spain.聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a或聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b联合利巴韦林治疗西班牙慢性丙型肝炎的药物经济学分析
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Nov;36(9):555-64. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
3
A real-world impact of cost-effectiveness of pegylated interferon/ribavarin regimens on treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis C patients in Taiwan.聚乙二醇干扰素/利巴韦林治疗方案的成本效益对台湾初治慢性丙型肝炎患者的实际影响。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2017 Jan;33(1):44-49. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
4
Cost-effectiveness of boceprevir co-administration versus pegylated interferon-α2b and ribavirin only for patients with hepatitis C genotype 1 in Singapore.在新加坡,对于丙型肝炎基因1型患者,博赛匹韦联合用药与仅使用聚乙二醇化干扰素-α2b和利巴韦林的成本效益比较。
Antivir Ther. 2015;20(2):209-16. doi: 10.3851/IMP2825. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
5
Cost-effectiveness of telaprevir in combination with pegylated interferon alpha and ribavirin in treatment-experienced chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 patients.telaprevir 联合聚乙二醇干扰素 α 和利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎 1 型经治患者的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2014 Jan;17(1):77-87. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.844159. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of boceprevir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection in Portugal.葡萄牙 boceprevir 治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒 1 型感染的成本效益分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Feb;11(1):65-78. doi: 10.1007/s40258-012-0007-8.
7
Cost-effectiveness of combination peginterferon alpha-2a and ribavirin compared with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C.聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a与利巴韦林联合用药对比干扰素α-2b与利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者的成本效益分析
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Aug;99(8):1490-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30286.x.
8
Cost-effectiveness of telaprevir in combination with pegylated interferon alpha and ribavirin in previously untreated chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 patients.替拉瑞韦联合聚乙二醇干扰素α和利巴韦林治疗初治慢性丙型肝炎基因 1 型患者的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2014 Jan;17(1):65-76. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.860033. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
9
Boceprevir for Chronic Genotype 1 Hepatitis C Virus in the Current Health Care Setting in Greece: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis.在希腊当前医疗环境下,波西普韦用于慢性基因1型丙型肝炎病毒感染的成本效益分析。
Clin Ther. 2015 Jul 1;37(7):1529-40. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 May 29.
10
Identification of groups with poor cost-effectiveness of peginterferon plus ribavirin for naïve hepatitis C patients with a real-world cohort and database.利用真实世界队列和数据库识别初治丙型肝炎患者使用聚乙二醇干扰素加利巴韦林成本效益不佳的群体。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(22):e6984. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006984.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-world experience for the outcomes and costs of treating hepatitis C patients: Results from the German Hepatitis C-Registry (DHC-R).治疗丙型肝炎患者的结局和成本的真实世界经验:来自德国丙型肝炎注册研究(DHC-R)的结果。
Z Gastroenterol. 2023 May;61(5):489-503. doi: 10.1055/a-1852-5713. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
2
Hepatitis C in healthcare personnel: follow-up analysis of treatments with direct-acting antiviral agents.医护人员中的丙型肝炎:直接抗病毒药物治疗的随访分析
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2021 Aug 24;16(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12995-021-00320-4.
3
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents for Occupational Hepatitis C Infections in Germany.
德国职业性丙型肝炎感染直接作用抗病毒药物的成本效益分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 9;17(2):440. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020440.
4
Regional and Rural-Urban Differences in the Use of Direct-acting Antiviral Agents for Hepatitis C Virus: The Veteran Birth Cohort.区域和城乡之间丙型肝炎病毒直接作用抗病毒药物使用的差异:退伍军人出生队列。
Med Care. 2019 Apr;57(4):279-285. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001071.
5
Hepatitis C in healthcare personnel: secondary data analysis of therapies with direct-acting antiviral agents.医护人员中的丙型肝炎:直接抗病毒药物治疗的二次数据分析
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2018 May 25;13:16. doi: 10.1186/s12995-018-0197-6. eCollection 2018.
6
The cost of successful antiviral therapy in hepatitis C patients: a comparison of IFN-free versus IFN-based regimens at an individual patient level in Australia.丙型肝炎患者成功进行抗病毒治疗的成本:澳大利亚个体患者层面无干扰素方案与基于干扰素方案的比较。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Oct 3;9:595-607. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S146280. eCollection 2017.
7
Outcomes and Costs of Treating Hepatitis C Patients in the Era of First Generation Protease Inhibitors - Results from the PAN Study.第一代蛋白酶抑制剂时代丙型肝炎患者的治疗结果与成本——PAN研究结果
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 28;11(7):e0159976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159976. eCollection 2016.