• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丙型肝炎患者成功进行抗病毒治疗的成本:澳大利亚个体患者层面无干扰素方案与基于干扰素方案的比较。

The cost of successful antiviral therapy in hepatitis C patients: a comparison of IFN-free versus IFN-based regimens at an individual patient level in Australia.

作者信息

Lee Allister Sebastian, van Driel Mieke L, Crawford Darrell Hg

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine.

Primary Care Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine.

出版信息

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Oct 3;9:595-607. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S146280. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S146280
PMID:29042803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5633296/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis C remains a major global health burden with serious long-term consequences if left untreated. Recently the treatment standard of care has shifted to new interferon (IFN)-free drug regimens, which have been shown to be safe and effective. The aim of our study was to assess and compare medical resource utilization and costs of successfully treating patients with IFN-based and IFN-free therapies in Australia.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of 30 HCV-infected patients successfully treated with IFN-based therapy between 2013 and 2015. We also generated a model for a virtual group of 100 genotype 1 (GT1) and 100 genotype 3 (GT3) patients treated with IFN-free therapy derived from national guidelines and clinical trial data.

RESULTS

In comparison to virtual patients receiving IFN-free therapy, our IFN-treated patients on average had distinctively more liver clinic visits and blood tests. However, mean total cost per patient was $19,164 and $85,300 (AUD) more for GT1 and GT3 patients receiving IFN-free therapy, respectively. This difference was largely accounted for by higher antiviral drug costs. Of our 30 patients treated with IFN, total mean cost per patient during the study period was $33,595.

CONCLUSION

Resource utilization is lower with IFN-free treatment, which reflects the reduced need for patient monitoring and improved side-effect profile of these new drugs. However, total costs are still largely dominated by antiviral drug costs, representing a huge burden on national budgets. Our insight into resource utilization and costs associated with both types of treatment can serve as a reference for future studies.

摘要

背景

慢性丙型肝炎仍然是一项重大的全球健康负担,如果不进行治疗会产生严重的长期后果。最近,护理的治疗标准已转向新的无干扰素药物方案,这些方案已被证明是安全有效的。我们研究的目的是评估和比较澳大利亚采用基于干扰素和无干扰素疗法成功治疗患者的医疗资源利用情况和成本。

方法

我们对2013年至2015年间30例采用基于干扰素疗法成功治疗的丙型肝炎病毒感染患者进行了回顾性病历审查。我们还根据国家指南和临床试验数据,为100例接受无干扰素疗法的基因1型(GT1)和100例基因3型(GT3)患者的虚拟组建立了一个模型。

结果

与接受无干扰素疗法的虚拟患者相比,我们接受干扰素治疗的患者平均有明显更多的肝脏门诊就诊和血液检查。然而,接受无干扰素疗法的GT1和GT3患者的平均每位患者总成本分别高出19,164澳元和85,300澳元。这种差异在很大程度上是由更高的抗病毒药物成本造成的。在我们接受干扰素治疗的30例患者中,研究期间每位患者的总平均成本为33,595澳元。

结论

无干扰素治疗的资源利用较低,这反映了对患者监测需求的减少以及这些新药改善的副作用情况。然而,总成本仍然在很大程度上由抗病毒药物成本主导,这对国家预算来说是一个巨大负担。我们对两种治疗类型相关的资源利用和成本的见解可为未来研究提供参考。

相似文献

1
The cost of successful antiviral therapy in hepatitis C patients: a comparison of IFN-free versus IFN-based regimens at an individual patient level in Australia.丙型肝炎患者成功进行抗病毒治疗的成本:澳大利亚个体患者层面无干扰素方案与基于干扰素方案的比较。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Oct 3;9:595-607. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S146280. eCollection 2017.
2
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
3
Medical resource utilization and costs among Australian patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C: results of a retrospective observational study.澳大利亚1型慢性丙型肝炎患者的医疗资源利用情况及费用:一项回顾性观察性研究的结果
J Med Econ. 2017 Jan;20(1):72-81. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1227827. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
4
Should we await IFN-free regimens to treat HCV genotype 1 treatment-naive patients? A cost-effectiveness analysis (ANRS 95141).我们是否应该等待无干扰素方案来治疗 HCV 基因型 1 初治患者?一项成本效益分析(ANRS 95141)。
J Hepatol. 2014 Jul;61(1):7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
5
Have we significantly underestimated the capacity in the Australian health system to treat chronic hepatitis C infection in an interferon-free era?在无干扰素时代,我们是否严重低估了澳大利亚医疗系统治疗慢性丙型肝炎感染的能力?
Intern Med J. 2017 Mar;47(3):269-274. doi: 10.1111/imj.13262.
6
Micro-costing analysis of guideline-based treatment by direct-acting agents: the real-life case of hepatitis C management in Brazil.基于直接作用抗病毒药物的指南治疗的微观成本分析:巴西丙型肝炎管理的实际案例
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0676-8.
7
Direct costs of interferon-based and interferon-free direct-acting antiviral regimens for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection.用于治疗慢性丙型肝炎感染的基于干扰素和不含干扰素的直接抗病毒方案的直接成本。
J Viral Hepat. 2016 Sep;23(9):677-86. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12532. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
8
Assessing the burden of illness of chronic hepatitis C and impact of direct-acting antiviral use on healthcare costs in Medicaid.评估慢性丙型肝炎的疾病负担以及直接作用抗病毒药物在医疗补助计划中对医疗成本的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Jun;25(8 Suppl):S131-S139.
9
Predicting the impact of adverse events and treatment duration on medical resource utilization-related costs in hepatitis C genotype 1 treatment-naïve patients receiving antiviral therapy.预测不良事件和治疗持续时间对接受抗病毒治疗的初治丙型肝炎基因1型患者医疗资源利用相关成本的影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Apr;33(4):409-22. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0249-4.
10
Clinical characteristics, healthcare costs, and resource utilization in hepatitis C vary by genotype.丙型肝炎的临床特征、医疗费用和资源利用因基因型而异。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 May;33(5):829-836. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1288613. Epub 2017 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Budget impact analysis of two treatment approaches for hepatitis C in Malaysia through the use of voluntary and compulsory licensing options.马来西亚使用自愿和强制许可选择治疗丙型肝炎的两种方法的预算影响分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 22;11:1114560. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1114560. eCollection 2023.
2
Cost and cost-effectiveness of a real-world HCV treatment program among HIV-infected individuals in Myanmar.缅甸 HIV 感染者真实世界 HCV 治疗方案的成本和成本效益。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Feb;6(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004181.

本文引用的文献

1
Real-world outcomes of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in treatment-naive patients with hepatitis C.来迪派韦/索磷布韦用于初治丙型肝炎患者的真实世界疗效
Am J Manag Care. 2016 May;22(6 Spec No.):SP205-11.
2
Prices, Costs, and Affordability of New Medicines for Hepatitis C in 30 Countries: An Economic Analysis.30个国家丙型肝炎新药的价格、成本及可负担性:一项经济分析
PLoS Med. 2016 May 31;13(5):e1002032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002032. eCollection 2016 May.
3
Cost-effectiveness of currently recommended direct-acting antiviral treatments in patients infected with genotypes 1 or 4 hepatitis C virus in the US.美国目前推荐的直接作用抗病毒治疗方案对感染1型或4型丙型肝炎病毒患者的成本效益分析
J Med Econ. 2016 Aug;19(8):795-805. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1176030. Epub 2016 Apr 24.
4
Costs and outcomes of treating chronic hepatitis C patients in routine care - results from a nationwide multicenter trial.常规治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者的成本与疗效——一项全国性多中心试验的结果
J Viral Hepat. 2016 Feb;23(2):105-15. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12471. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
5
Cost-effectiveness of sofosbuvir-based treatments for chronic hepatitis C in the US.基于索磷布韦的治疗方案在美国慢性丙型肝炎治疗中的成本效益
BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 5;15:98. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0320-4.
6
Outcomes, costs and cost-effectiveness of treating hepatitis C with direct acting antivirals.使用直接抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎的疗效、成本及成本效益
J Comp Eff Res. 2015 May;4(3):267-277. doi: 10.2217/cer.15.13. Epub 2015 May 11.
7
EASL Recommendations on Treatment of Hepatitis C 2015.2015年欧洲肝脏研究学会丙型肝炎治疗指南
J Hepatol. 2015 Jul;63(1):199-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.03.025. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
8
Treatment patterns, health care resource utilization, and costs in U.S. patients diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C infection who received telaprevir or boceprevir.美国慢性丙型肝炎感染患者接受特拉匹韦或博赛匹韦治疗的治疗模式、医疗资源利用和成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Apr;21(4):308-18. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.4.308.
9
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of hepatitis C virus treatment with sofosbuvir and ledipasvir in the United States.索磷布韦和来迪帕司韦治疗丙型肝炎病毒在美国的成本效益和预算影响
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Mar 17;162(6):397-406. doi: 10.7326/M14-1336.
10
All-oral 12-week treatment with daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 3 infection: ALLY-3 phase III study.丙型肝炎病毒基因3型感染患者使用达卡他韦加索磷布韦进行12周全口服治疗:ALLY-3 III期研究
Hepatology. 2015 Apr;61(4):1127-35. doi: 10.1002/hep.27726. Epub 2015 Mar 10.