10527A Skyline Drive, Corning, NY 14830, USA.
Département Ecologie et Gestion de la Biodiversité, UMR 7204 CNRS/MNHN/UPMC, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Oct;30(10):581-589. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.07.006.
The recent trend for journals to require open access to primary data included in publications has been embraced by many biologists, but has caused apprehension amongst researchers engaged in long-term ecological and evolutionary studies. A worldwide survey of 73 principal investigators (Pls) with long-term studies revealed positive attitudes towards sharing data with the agreement or involvement of the PI, and 93% of PIs have historically shared data. Only 8% were in favor of uncontrolled, open access to primary data while 63% expressed serious concern. We present here their viewpoint on an issue that can have non-trivial scientific consequences. We discuss potential costs of public data archiving and provide possible solutions to meet the needs of journals and researchers.
近年来,期刊要求出版物中包含的原始数据开放获取的趋势得到了许多生物学家的认可,但却引起了从事长期生态和进化研究的研究人员的担忧。一项针对 73 名长期研究的首席研究员(PI)的全球调查显示,PI 们对在 PI 的同意或参与下共享数据持积极态度,并且 93%的 PI 历史上都有过数据共享。只有 8%的人赞成不受控制的原始数据开放获取,而 63%的人则表示严重关切。在这里,我们介绍了他们对这个可能产生非平凡科学后果的问题的看法。我们讨论了公开数据存档的潜在成本,并提供了可能的解决方案,以满足期刊和研究人员的需求。