Deniz Sungur D, Moinzadeh A-T, Wesselink P R, Çalt Tarhan S, Özok A R
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Endodonti AD. 4. Kat, Sıhhiye, 06100, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Endodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, Gustav Mahlerlaan 3004, 1081 LA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Jun;20(5):1071-7. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1593-2. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
The aim of the present study was to compare the sealing efficacy of root fillings made by a single-cone technique with three different sealers and a cold lateral compaction technique with an epoxy sealer.
Eighty extracted single-rooted human teeth were assigned to four experimental groups: group 1, single-cone and epoxy sealer; group 2, single-cone and calcium silicate-based sealer; group 3, single-cone and methacrylate resin-based sealer; and group 4, cold lateral compaction and epoxy sealer. Twenty extra teeth served as negative and positive controls. After preparation of a coronal post space, the sealing efficacy of the root fillings was assessed on a fluid transport setup. The results were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test.
No fluid transport was detected for the negative controls whereas all the positive controls showed rapid fluid transport. No significant difference was detected between groups 1, 3, and 4 whereas group 2 demonstrated significantly more fluid transport than all the other experimental groups.
Root fillings made by a single-cone technique with the epoxy or methacrylate-based sealers were as effective after post space preparation as those made by a cold lateral technique with the epoxy sealer in sealing the root canal.
Specific root canal sealers in combination with single-cone technique represent a noteworthy alternative to the use of cold lateral compaction technique when a post space is required. The use of effective endodontic procedures with simplified technical implementation may positively affect endodontic outcome.
本研究的目的是比较采用三种不同封闭剂的单锥技术制备的根管充填物与采用环氧封闭剂的冷侧方加压技术的封闭效果。
将80颗拔除的单根人牙分为四个实验组:第1组,单锥技术与环氧封闭剂;第2组,单锥技术与硅酸钙基封闭剂;第3组,单锥技术与甲基丙烯酸树脂基封闭剂;第4组,冷侧方加压技术与环氧封闭剂。另外20颗牙齿作为阴性和阳性对照。在制备冠部桩道后,在液体传输装置上评估根管充填物的封闭效果。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney U检验分析结果。
阴性对照未检测到液体传输,而所有阳性对照均显示出快速的液体传输。第1组、第3组和第4组之间未检测到显著差异,而第2组显示出比所有其他实验组显著更多的液体传输。
在制备桩道后,采用环氧或甲基丙烯酸酯基封闭剂的单锥技术制备的根管充填物在封闭根管方面与采用环氧封闭剂的冷侧方技术制备的根管充填物一样有效。
当需要桩道时,特定的根管封闭剂与单锥技术相结合是冷侧方加压技术的一个值得注意的替代方法。采用技术实施简化的有效牙髓治疗程序可能会对牙髓治疗结果产生积极影响。