Naylor Mary D, Hirschman Karen B, Hanlon Alexandra L, Abbott Katherine M, Bowles Kathryn H, Foust Janice, Shah Shivani, Zubritsky Cynthia
NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health; University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health; University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Jan;17(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.07.019. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
Advance knowledge about changes in multiple dimensions of health related quality of life (HRQoL) among older adults receiving long-term services and supports (LTSS) over time and across settings.
A prospective, observational, longitudinal cohort design.
Nursing homes (NHs), assisted living facilities (ALFs), community.
A total of 470 older adults who were first-time recipients of LTSS.
Single-item quality-of-life measure assessed every 3 months over 2 years. HRQoL domains of emotional status, functional status, and social support were measured using standardized instruments.
Multivariable mixed effects model with time varying covariates revealed that quality-of-life ratings decreased over time (P < .001). Quality-of-life ratings were higher among enrollees with fewer depressive symptoms (P < .001), higher general physical function (P < .001), enhanced emotional well-being (P < .001), and greater social support (P = .004). Ratings also were higher among those with increased deficits in activities of daily living (P = .02). Ratings were highest among enrollees who received LTSS from ALFs, followed by NHs, then home and community-based services (H&CBS), but only findings between ALFs and H&CBS were statistically significant (P < .001). Finally, ratings tended to decrease over time among enrollees with greater cognitive impairment and increase over time among enrollees with less cognitive impairment (P < .001).
Findings advance knowledge regarding what is arguably the most important outcome of elderly LTSS recipients: quality of life. Understanding associations between multiple HRQoL domains and quality of life over time and directly from LTSS recipients represents a critical step in enhancing care processes and outcomes of this vulnerable population.
增进对接受长期服务与支持(LTSS)的老年人在一段时间内及不同环境下健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)多维度变化的了解。
前瞻性、观察性纵向队列研究设计。
养老院(NHs)、辅助生活设施(ALFs)、社区。
总共470名首次接受LTSS的老年人。
在两年时间里每3个月评估一次单项目生活质量指标。使用标准化工具测量情绪状态、功能状态和社会支持等HRQoL领域。
带有随时间变化协变量的多变量混合效应模型显示,生活质量评分随时间下降(P < .001)。抑郁症状较少(P < .001)、总体身体功能较高(P < .001)、情绪幸福感增强(P < .001)以及社会支持较多(P = .004)的参与者生活质量评分较高。日常生活活动能力缺陷增加的参与者评分也较高(P = .02)。从ALFs接受LTSS的参与者评分最高,其次是NHs,然后是居家和社区服务(H&CBS),但只有ALFs与H&CBS之间的结果具有统计学意义(P < .001)。最后,认知障碍较重的参与者评分往往随时间下降,而认知障碍较轻的参与者评分随时间上升(P < .001)。
研究结果增进了对老年LTSS接受者最重要结果(即生活质量)的了解。了解多个HRQoL领域与生活质量之间随时间的关联,并直接来自LTSS接受者,是改善这一弱势群体护理过程和结果的关键一步。