Carroll G A, Boyle L A, Teixeira D L, van Staaveren N, Hanlon A, O'Connell N E
1Institute for Global Food Security,Northern Ireland Technology Centre,Queens University Belfast,Malone Road,Belfast BT9 5HN,UK.
2Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre,Teagasc Moorepark,Fermoy,Co Cork,Republic of Ireland.
Animal. 2016 Mar;10(3):460-7. doi: 10.1017/S1751731115002037. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
There is increasing interest in developing abattoir-based measures to assist in determining the welfare status of pigs. The primary aim of this study was to determine the most appropriate place on the slaughter line to conduct assessments of welfare-related lesions, namely apparent aggression-related skin lesions (hereafter referred to as 'skin lesions'), loin bruising and apparent tail biting damage. The study also lent itself to an assessment of the prevalence of these lesions, and the extent to which they were linked with production variables. Finishing pigs processed at two abattoirs on the Island of Ireland (n=1950 in abattoir A, and n=1939 in abattoir B) were used. Data were collected over 6 days in each abattoir in July 2014. Lesion scoring took place at two points on the slaughter line: (1) at exsanguination (slaughter stage 1 (SS1)), and (2) following scalding and dehairing of carcasses (slaughter stage 2 (SS2)). At both points, each carcass was assigned a skin and tail lesion score ranging from 0 (lesion absent) to 3 or 4 (severe lesions), respectively. Loin bruising was recorded as present or absent. Differences in the percentage of pigs with observable lesions of each type were compared between SS1 and SS2 using McNemar/McNemar-Bowker tests. The associations between each lesion type, and both cold carcass weight and condemnations, were examined at batch level using Pearson's correlations. Batch was defined as the group of animals with a particular farm identification code on a given day. The overall percentage of pigs with a visible skin lesion (i.e. score>0) decreased between SS1 and SS2 (P<0.001). However, the percentage of pigs with a severe skin lesion increased numerically from SS1 to SS2. The percentage of pigs with a visible tail lesion and with loin bruising also increased between SS1 and SS2 (P<0.001). There was a positive correlation between the percentage of carcasses that were partially condemned, and the percentage of pigs with skin lesions, tail lesions and loin bruising (P<0.05). In addition, as the batch-level frequency of each lesion type increased, average cold carcass weight decreased (P<0.001). These findings suggest that severe skin lesions, tail lesions and loin bruising are more visible on pig carcasses after they have been scalded and dehaired, and that this is when abattoir-based lesion scoring should take place. The high prevalence of all three lesion types, and the links with economically important production parameters, suggests that more research into identifying key risk factors is warranted.
人们对制定基于屠宰场的措施以协助确定猪的福利状况的兴趣与日俱增。本研究的主要目的是确定屠宰线上进行福利相关损伤评估的最合适位置,即明显的攻击相关皮肤损伤(以下简称“皮肤损伤”)、腰部瘀伤和明显的咬尾损伤。该研究还便于评估这些损伤的发生率,以及它们与生产变量的关联程度。使用了在爱尔兰岛的两个屠宰场加工的育肥猪(屠宰场A有1950头,屠宰场B有1939头)。2014年7月在每个屠宰场的6天内收集数据。损伤评分在屠宰线上的两个点进行:(1)放血时(屠宰阶段1(SS1)),以及(2)猪胴体烫毛和脱毛后(屠宰阶段2(SS2))。在这两个点,每个胴体分别被赋予一个皮肤和尾巴损伤评分,范围从0(无损伤)到3或4(严重损伤)。腰部瘀伤记录为有或无。使用McNemar/McNemar - Bowker检验比较SS1和SS2之间每种可观察到损伤类型的猪的百分比差异。在批次水平上使用Pearson相关性检验每种损伤类型与冷胴体重和胴体废弃率之间的关联。批次定义为在给定日期具有特定农场识别码的动物群体。在SS1和SS2之间,有可见皮肤损伤(即评分>0)的猪的总体百分比下降(P<0.001)。然而,从SS1到SS2,有严重皮肤损伤的猪的百分比在数值上有所增加。在SS1和SS2之间,有可见尾巴损伤和腰部瘀伤的猪的百分比也增加了(P<0.001)。部分废弃胴体的百分比与有皮肤损伤、尾巴损伤和腰部瘀伤的猪的百分比之间存在正相关(P<0.05)。此外,随着每种损伤类型在批次水平上的频率增加,平均冷胴体重下降(P<0.001)。这些发现表明,严重的皮肤损伤、尾巴损伤和腰部瘀伤在猪胴体烫毛和脱毛后更明显,这就是基于屠宰场的损伤评分应该进行的时间。所有三种损伤类型的高发生率以及与经济上重要的生产参数的关联表明,有必要对识别关键风险因素进行更多研究。