Suppr超能文献

农场中猪的福利。

Welfare of pigs on farm.

作者信息

Nielsen Søren Saxmose, Alvarez Julio, Bicout Dominique Joseph, Calistri Paolo, Canali Elisabetta, Drewe Julian Ashley, Garin-Bastuji Bruno, Gonzales Rojas Jose Luis, Schmidt Gortázar, Herskin Mette, Michel Virginie, Miranda Chueca Miguel Ángel, Mosbach-Schulz Olaf, Padalino Barbara, Roberts Helen Clare, Stahl Karl, Velarde Antonio, Viltrop Arvo, Winckler Christoph, Edwards Sandra, Ivanova Sonya, Leeb Christine, Wechsler Beat, Fabris Chiara, Lima Eliana, Mosbach-Schulz Olaf, Van der Stede Yves, Vitali Marika, Spoolder Hans

出版信息

EFSA J. 2022 Aug 25;20(8):e07421. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7421. eCollection 2022 Aug.

Abstract

This scientific opinion focuses on the welfare of pigs on farm, and is based on literature and expert opinion. All pig categories were assessed: gilts and dry sows, farrowing and lactating sows, suckling piglets, weaners, rearing pigs and boars. The most relevant husbandry systems used in Europe are described. For each system, highly relevant welfare consequences were identified, as well as related animal-based measures (ABMs), and hazards leading to the welfare consequences. Moreover, measures to prevent or correct the hazards and/or mitigate the welfare consequences are recommended. Recommendations are also provided on quantitative or qualitative criteria to answer specific questions on the welfare of pigs related to tail biting and related to the European Citizen's Initiative 'End the Cage Age'. For example, the AHAW Panel recommends how to mitigate group stress when dry sows and gilts are grouped immediately after weaning or in early pregnancy. Results of a comparative qualitative assessment suggested that long-stemmed or long-cut straw, hay or haylage is the most suitable material for nest-building. A period of time will be needed for staff and animals to adapt to housing lactating sows and their piglets in farrowing pens (as opposed to crates) before achieving stable welfare outcomes. The panel recommends a minimum available space to the lactating sow to ensure piglet welfare (measured by live-born piglet mortality). Among the main risk factors for tail biting are space allowance, types of flooring, air quality, health status and diet composition, while weaning age was not associated directly with tail biting in later life. The relationship between the availability of space and growth rate, lying behaviour and tail biting in rearing pigs is quantified and presented. Finally, the panel suggests a set of ABMs to use at slaughter for monitoring on-farm welfare of cull sows and rearing pigs.

摘要

本科学意见聚焦于农场猪的福利,基于文献和专家意见。对所有猪的类别进行了评估:后备母猪和空怀母猪、分娩和哺乳母猪、哺乳仔猪、断奶仔猪、育肥猪和公猪。描述了欧洲使用的最相关的养殖系统。针对每个系统,确定了高度相关的福利后果、相关的基于动物的措施(ABM)以及导致福利后果的危害。此外,还建议了预防或纠正危害和/或减轻福利后果的措施。还就定量或定性标准提供了建议,以回答与咬尾及与欧洲公民倡议“结束笼养时代”相关的猪福利的具体问题。例如,动物健康和福利小组建议在断奶后或怀孕早期将空怀母猪和后备母猪合群时如何减轻群体应激。一项比较性定性评估结果表明,长茎或长切的稻草、干草或青贮饲料是最适合做窝的材料。在实现稳定的福利结果之前,工作人员和动物需要一段时间来适应在分娩栏(而非产仔箱)中饲养哺乳母猪及其仔猪。该小组建议为哺乳母猪提供最小可用空间以确保仔猪福利(以出生存活仔猪死亡率衡量)。咬尾的主要风险因素包括空间供应量、地板类型、空气质量、健康状况和饮食组成,而断奶年龄与后期的咬尾没有直接关联。对育肥猪的空间供应量与生长速度、躺卧行为和咬尾之间的关系进行了量化并呈现。最后,该小组建议了一套在屠宰时使用的ABM,用于监测淘汰母猪和育肥猪的农场福利。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/fe214da0b870/EFS2-20-e07421-g022.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验