• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农场中猪的福利。

Welfare of pigs on farm.

作者信息

Nielsen Søren Saxmose, Alvarez Julio, Bicout Dominique Joseph, Calistri Paolo, Canali Elisabetta, Drewe Julian Ashley, Garin-Bastuji Bruno, Gonzales Rojas Jose Luis, Schmidt Gortázar, Herskin Mette, Michel Virginie, Miranda Chueca Miguel Ángel, Mosbach-Schulz Olaf, Padalino Barbara, Roberts Helen Clare, Stahl Karl, Velarde Antonio, Viltrop Arvo, Winckler Christoph, Edwards Sandra, Ivanova Sonya, Leeb Christine, Wechsler Beat, Fabris Chiara, Lima Eliana, Mosbach-Schulz Olaf, Van der Stede Yves, Vitali Marika, Spoolder Hans

出版信息

EFSA J. 2022 Aug 25;20(8):e07421. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7421. eCollection 2022 Aug.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7421
PMID:36034323
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9405538/
Abstract

This scientific opinion focuses on the welfare of pigs on farm, and is based on literature and expert opinion. All pig categories were assessed: gilts and dry sows, farrowing and lactating sows, suckling piglets, weaners, rearing pigs and boars. The most relevant husbandry systems used in Europe are described. For each system, highly relevant welfare consequences were identified, as well as related animal-based measures (ABMs), and hazards leading to the welfare consequences. Moreover, measures to prevent or correct the hazards and/or mitigate the welfare consequences are recommended. Recommendations are also provided on quantitative or qualitative criteria to answer specific questions on the welfare of pigs related to tail biting and related to the European Citizen's Initiative 'End the Cage Age'. For example, the AHAW Panel recommends how to mitigate group stress when dry sows and gilts are grouped immediately after weaning or in early pregnancy. Results of a comparative qualitative assessment suggested that long-stemmed or long-cut straw, hay or haylage is the most suitable material for nest-building. A period of time will be needed for staff and animals to adapt to housing lactating sows and their piglets in farrowing pens (as opposed to crates) before achieving stable welfare outcomes. The panel recommends a minimum available space to the lactating sow to ensure piglet welfare (measured by live-born piglet mortality). Among the main risk factors for tail biting are space allowance, types of flooring, air quality, health status and diet composition, while weaning age was not associated directly with tail biting in later life. The relationship between the availability of space and growth rate, lying behaviour and tail biting in rearing pigs is quantified and presented. Finally, the panel suggests a set of ABMs to use at slaughter for monitoring on-farm welfare of cull sows and rearing pigs.

摘要

本科学意见聚焦于农场猪的福利,基于文献和专家意见。对所有猪的类别进行了评估:后备母猪和空怀母猪、分娩和哺乳母猪、哺乳仔猪、断奶仔猪、育肥猪和公猪。描述了欧洲使用的最相关的养殖系统。针对每个系统,确定了高度相关的福利后果、相关的基于动物的措施(ABM)以及导致福利后果的危害。此外,还建议了预防或纠正危害和/或减轻福利后果的措施。还就定量或定性标准提供了建议,以回答与咬尾及与欧洲公民倡议“结束笼养时代”相关的猪福利的具体问题。例如,动物健康和福利小组建议在断奶后或怀孕早期将空怀母猪和后备母猪合群时如何减轻群体应激。一项比较性定性评估结果表明,长茎或长切的稻草、干草或青贮饲料是最适合做窝的材料。在实现稳定的福利结果之前,工作人员和动物需要一段时间来适应在分娩栏(而非产仔箱)中饲养哺乳母猪及其仔猪。该小组建议为哺乳母猪提供最小可用空间以确保仔猪福利(以出生存活仔猪死亡率衡量)。咬尾的主要风险因素包括空间供应量、地板类型、空气质量、健康状况和饮食组成,而断奶年龄与后期的咬尾没有直接关联。对育肥猪的空间供应量与生长速度、躺卧行为和咬尾之间的关系进行了量化并呈现。最后,该小组建议了一套在屠宰时使用的ABM,用于监测淘汰母猪和育肥猪的农场福利。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/4501399f16cd/EFS2-20-e07421-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/fe214da0b870/EFS2-20-e07421-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/c9748655fc58/EFS2-20-e07421-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/b6e09f660036/EFS2-20-e07421-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/a66741f90ec0/EFS2-20-e07421-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/4ea93a974607/EFS2-20-e07421-g026.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/4d41f76015c2/EFS2-20-e07421-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/fcc525d73cf3/EFS2-20-e07421-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/4b173bac58e5/EFS2-20-e07421-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/0e3858251eb4/EFS2-20-e07421-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/682727469ac8/EFS2-20-e07421-g024.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/6d52068114d8/EFS2-20-e07421-g027.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/236b7d69b56e/EFS2-20-e07421-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/6111ea53f87b/EFS2-20-e07421-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/22b0f54f1882/EFS2-20-e07421-g023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/1f5981c22de7/EFS2-20-e07421-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/076b91302f12/EFS2-20-e07421-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/acb445fbe846/EFS2-20-e07421-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/d4eb553197be/EFS2-20-e07421-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/527db4594a8e/EFS2-20-e07421-g025.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/c2cb1629d38c/EFS2-20-e07421-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/02974fe3145e/EFS2-20-e07421-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/9461840cdcbd/EFS2-20-e07421-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/3b68918d60d7/EFS2-20-e07421-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/6ec6b9f23d1a/EFS2-20-e07421-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/0573a7204fbd/EFS2-20-e07421-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/eb240d9253db/EFS2-20-e07421-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/4501399f16cd/EFS2-20-e07421-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/fe214da0b870/EFS2-20-e07421-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/c9748655fc58/EFS2-20-e07421-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/b6e09f660036/EFS2-20-e07421-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/a66741f90ec0/EFS2-20-e07421-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/4ea93a974607/EFS2-20-e07421-g026.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/4d41f76015c2/EFS2-20-e07421-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/fcc525d73cf3/EFS2-20-e07421-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/4b173bac58e5/EFS2-20-e07421-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/0e3858251eb4/EFS2-20-e07421-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/682727469ac8/EFS2-20-e07421-g024.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/6d52068114d8/EFS2-20-e07421-g027.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/236b7d69b56e/EFS2-20-e07421-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/6111ea53f87b/EFS2-20-e07421-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/22b0f54f1882/EFS2-20-e07421-g023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/1f5981c22de7/EFS2-20-e07421-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/076b91302f12/EFS2-20-e07421-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/acb445fbe846/EFS2-20-e07421-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/d4eb553197be/EFS2-20-e07421-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/527db4594a8e/EFS2-20-e07421-g025.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/c2cb1629d38c/EFS2-20-e07421-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/02974fe3145e/EFS2-20-e07421-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/9461840cdcbd/EFS2-20-e07421-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/3b68918d60d7/EFS2-20-e07421-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/6ec6b9f23d1a/EFS2-20-e07421-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/0573a7204fbd/EFS2-20-e07421-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/eb240d9253db/EFS2-20-e07421-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9405538/4501399f16cd/EFS2-20-e07421-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Welfare of pigs on farm.农场中猪的福利。
EFSA J. 2022 Aug 25;20(8):e07421. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7421. eCollection 2022 Aug.
2
Animal board invited review: The need to consider emissions, economics and pig welfare in the transition from farrowing crates to pens with loose lactating sows.动物委员会邀请的评论:从分娩笼向带松散泌乳母猪的猪圈过渡时需要考虑排放、经济和猪只福利。
Animal. 2023 Sep;17(9):100913. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100913. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
3
Tear staining in pigs: a potential tool for welfare assessment on commercial farms.猪的泪痕:商业农场福利评估的潜在工具。
Animal. 2016 Feb;10(2):318-25. doi: 10.1017/S175173111500172X. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
4
Impact of farrowing system and prepartum nest-building material on nest-building behaviour and farrowing in sows.分娩系统和产前筑巢材料对母猪筑巢行为和分娩的影响。
Animal. 2024 Jun;18(6):101183. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101183. Epub 2024 May 10.
5
[Effects of socializing piglets in lactation on behaviour, including tail-biting, in growing and finishing pigs].哺乳仔猪社交对生长育肥猪行为的影响,包括咬尾行为
Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere. 2016 Jun 16;44(3):141-50. doi: 10.15653/TPG-160134. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
6
The effect of hessian and straw as nesting materials on sow behaviour and piglet survival and growth to weaning.麻包和稻草作为窝料对母猪行为和仔猪成活率及断奶生长的影响。
Animal. 2021 Jul;15(7):100273. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100273. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
7
Risk factors associated with tail damage in conventional non-docked pigs throughout the lactation and rearing period.与哺乳期和育肥期常规未上笼猪尾巴损伤相关的风险因素。
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Nov;184:105160. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105160. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
8
Freedom to Grow: Improving Sow Welfare also Benefits Piglets.成长的自由:改善母猪福利对仔猪也有益。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Apr 20;11(4):1181. doi: 10.3390/ani11041181.
9
Sow communication with piglets while being active is a good predictor of maternal skills, piglet survival and litter quality in three different breeds of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus).母猪与仔猪活跃时的交流是其母性技能、仔猪存活率和窝产仔数的良好预测指标,这在三个不同品种的家猪(Sus scrofa domesticus)中得到了验证。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 14;13(11):e0206128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206128. eCollection 2018.
10
Confinement of lactating sows in crates for 4 days after farrowing reduces piglet mortality.在分娩后 4 天内将哺乳母猪限制在产床上,可降低仔猪死亡率。
Animal. 2013 Apr;7(4):648-54. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112002170. Epub 2012 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Feed disappearance, production, skin lesions and predicted environmental outcomes from different lactating sow feeding strategies.不同泌乳母猪饲喂策略下的采食量、产奶量、皮肤损伤及预测的环境结果
Vet Anim Sci. 2025 Jul 12;29:100478. doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2025.100478. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Welfare of beef cattle.肉牛福利。
EFSA J. 2025 Jul 25;23(7):e9518. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9518. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Review: Gut Microbiota-A Powerful Tool for Improving Pig Welfare by Influencing Behavior Through the Gut-Brain Axis.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating risk factors behind piglet facial and sow teat lesions through a literature review and a survey on teeth reduction.通过文献综述和牙齿减少情况调查来探究仔猪面部和母猪乳头损伤背后的风险因素。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Dec 2;9:909401. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.909401. eCollection 2022.
2
Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy.《从农场到餐桌战略》背景下动物福利授权制定的方法指南。
EFSA J. 2022 Jul 12;20(7):e07403. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7403. eCollection 2022 Jul.
3
Environmental Risk Factors Influence the Frequency of Coughing and Sneezing Episodes in Finisher Pigs on a Farm Free of Respiratory Disease.
综述:肠道微生物群——通过肠-脑轴影响行为来改善猪福利的有力工具。
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jun 26;15(13):1886. doi: 10.3390/ani15131886.
4
A review of existing scientific literature on welfare assessment of farmed species applied in commercial practice: identification of strengths, weaknesses, and areas for further development.对商业实践中应用的养殖动物福利评估现有科学文献的综述:优势、劣势及进一步发展领域的识别
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Jun 19;12:1589462. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1589462. eCollection 2025.
5
The Economic Implications of Phasing Out Pig Tail Docking: A Pilot Study in Italy.逐步淘汰仔猪断尾的经济影响:意大利的一项试点研究。
Animals (Basel). 2025 Apr 29;15(9):1250. doi: 10.3390/ani15091250.
6
Observations on the associations between damaging and aggressive behaviors, related lesions, and their implications for the welfare of pigs in the grower-finisher period.关于生长育肥期猪的伤害性和攻击性行为、相关损伤及其对猪福利影响之间关联的观察
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Mar 24;12:1523663. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1523663. eCollection 2025.
7
Screening of Piglets for Signs of Inflammation and Necrosis as Early Life Indicators of Animal Health and Welfare Hazards.对仔猪进行炎症和坏死体征筛查,作为动物健康和福利危害的早期生命指标。
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jan 28;15(3):378. doi: 10.3390/ani15030378.
8
Retrospective exploratory evaluation of individual pigs' behaviour involved in tail biting during rearing and fattening.对育肥期间参与咬尾行为的个体猪的行为进行回顾性探索性评估。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 13;20(1):e0316044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316044. eCollection 2025.
9
The Political Salience of Animal Protection in the Republic of Ireland (2011-2020): What Do Irish Political Parties Pledge on Animal Welfare and Wildlife Conservation?爱尔兰共和国动物保护的政治显著性(2011 - 2020年):爱尔兰各政党在动物福利和野生动物保护方面做出了哪些承诺?
Animals (Basel). 2024 Dec 15;14(24):3619. doi: 10.3390/ani14243619.
10
Welfare assessment of dromedary camels kept under pastoralism in Pakistan.巴基斯坦游牧饲养的单峰骆驼的福利评估。
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Oct 30;11:1442628. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1442628. eCollection 2024.
环境风险因素影响一个无呼吸道疾病猪场中育肥猪咳嗽和打喷嚏发作的频率。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Apr 11;12(8):982. doi: 10.3390/ani12080982.
4
The Relationship between Carcass Condemnations and Tail Lesion in Swine Considering Different Production Systems and Tail Lengths.考虑不同生产系统和尾巴长度的情况下,猪胴体判废与尾巴损伤之间的关系。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Apr 7;12(8):949. doi: 10.3390/ani12080949.
5
Review of Temporary Crating of Farrowing and Lactating Sows.母猪分娩和哺乳期临时圈养的综述。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Mar 17;9:811810. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.811810. eCollection 2022.
6
The Evidence for a Causal Link Between Disease and Damaging Behavior in Pigs.猪的疾病与有害行为之间因果关系的证据。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Jan 27;8:771682. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.771682. eCollection 2021.
7
Impact of Routine Management Procedures on the Welfare of Suckling Piglets.常规管理程序对哺乳仔猪福利的影响
Vet Sci. 2022 Jan 17;9(1):32. doi: 10.3390/vetsci9010032.
8
Short confinement of sows after farrowing, but not pen type affects live-born piglet mortality.分娩后母猪短期圈养,但圈舍类型不影响出生仔猪死亡率。
Animal. 2022 Feb;16(2):100446. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100446. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
9
Training Convolutional Neural Networks to Score Pneumonia in Slaughtered Pigs.训练卷积神经网络对屠宰猪的肺炎进行评分。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Nov 17;11(11):3290. doi: 10.3390/ani11113290.
10
Early Detection of Locomotion Disorders in Gilts Using a Novel Visual Analogue Scale; Associations with Chronic Stress and Reproduction.使用新型视觉模拟量表早期检测后备母猪的运动障碍;与慢性应激和繁殖的关联
Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 6;11(10):2900. doi: 10.3390/ani11102900.