Wiesjahn Martin, Jung Esther, Kremser Julian D, Rief Winfried, Lincoln Tania M
Department of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany.
Department of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;50:231-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
A central aspect of previous anti-stigma campaigns was the promotion of biogenetic causes of schizophrenia. Although biogenetic beliefs have been shown to reduce the blame given to persons with schizophrenia, they tend to increase discrimination and stereotypes such as dangerousness and unpredictability. A novel anti-stigma approach is to incorporate continuum beliefs in order to oppose the perceived separation, which is a main component of the stigma process. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of a continuum, a biogenetic, and a control intervention on stereotypes, fear, and social distance towards persons with schizophrenia. Furthermore, it was intended to replicate earlier findings on the associations between continuum beliefs, biogenetic beliefs, and different facets of stigmatization.
In an online-experiment, 1189 participants from the general population randomly received either a continuum, a biogenetic, or a control intervention, which consisted of written information texts.
The continuum group showed less endorsement of the stereotype incompetence/unpredictability than the biogenetic group. The biogenetic group ascribed less blame to persons with schizophrenia than the other groups. The correlation analyses indicated continuum beliefs to be consistently associated with lower stereotype scores, less fear, and less preferred social distance.
The sample was not fully representative and the experimental manipulations in our study consisted of relatively short information texts.
It is concluded that continuum beliefs have the potential to reduce stigmatization against persons with schizophrenia. However, future studies need to investigate the effects of more powerful interventions to promote them.
以往反污名化运动的一个核心方面是宣扬精神分裂症的生物遗传病因。尽管生物遗传观念已被证明能减少对精神分裂症患者的指责,但它们往往会加剧歧视和刻板印象,比如认为患者具有危险性和不可预测性。一种新的反污名化方法是纳入连续统观念,以对抗污名化过程的一个主要组成部分——即人们所感知到的精神分裂症患者与其他人之间的分隔。本研究的目的是比较连续统干预、生物遗传干预和对照干预对针对精神分裂症患者的刻板印象、恐惧及社交距离的影响。此外,本研究还旨在重复先前关于连续统观念、生物遗传观念与污名化不同方面之间关联的研究结果。
在一项在线实验中,1189名普通人群参与者被随机分配接受连续统干预、生物遗传干预或对照干预,干预内容均为书面信息文本。
连续统干预组对“无能力/不可预测”这一刻板印象的认同程度低于生物遗传干预组。生物遗传干预组对精神分裂症患者的指责少于其他组。相关性分析表明,连续统观念始终与较低的刻板印象得分、较少的恐惧及较近的社交距离偏好相关。
样本并不完全具有代表性,且本研究中的实验操作仅为相对简短的信息文本。
研究得出结论,连续统观念有潜力减少对精神分裂症患者的污名化。然而,未来的研究需要调查更有力的干预措施对推广这些观念的效果。