Bealey W J, Dore A J, Dragosits U, Reis S, Reay D S, Sutton M A
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik EH26 0QB, United Kingdom.
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik EH26 0QB, United Kingdom.
J Environ Manage. 2016 Jan 1;165:106-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.012. Epub 2015 Sep 27.
Trees are very effective at capturing both gaseous and particulate pollutants from the atmosphere. But while studies have often focussed on PM and NOx in the urban environment, little research has been carried out on the tree effect of capturing gaseous emissions of ammonia in the rural landscape. To examine the removal or scavenging of ammonia by trees a long-range atmospheric model (FRAME) was used to compare two strategies that could be used in emission reduction policies anywhere in the world where nitrogen pollution from agriculture is a problem. One strategy was to reduce the emission source strength of livestock management systems by implementing two 'tree-capture' systems scenarios - tree belts downwind of housing and managing livestock under trees. This emission reduction can be described as an 'on-farm' emission reduction policy, as ammonia is 'stopped' from dispersion outside the farm boundaries. The second strategy was to apply an afforestation policy targeting areas of high ammonia emission through two planting scenarios of increasing afforestation by 25% and 50%. Both strategies use trees with the aim of intercepting NH3 emissions to protect semi-natural areas. Scenarios for on-farm emission reductions showed national reductions in nitrogen deposition to semi-natural areas of 0.14% (0.2 kt N-NHx) to 2.2% (3.15 kt N-NHx). Scenarios mitigating emissions from cattle and pig housing gave the highest reductions. The afforestation strategy showed national reductions of 6% (8.4 kt N-NHx) to 11% (15.7 kt N-NHx) for 25% and 50% afforestation scenarios respectively. Increased capture by the planted trees also showed an added benefit of reducing long range effects including a decrease in wet deposition up to 3.7 kt N-NHx (4.6%) and a decrease in export from the UK up to 8.3 kt N-NHx (6.8%).
树木在捕获大气中的气态污染物和颗粒污染物方面非常有效。然而,尽管研究常常聚焦于城市环境中的颗粒物和氮氧化物,但对于农村地区树木捕获氨气态排放的效果,相关研究却很少。为了研究树木对氨的去除或清除作用,一个远程大气模型(FRAME)被用于比较两种可用于世界上任何农业氮污染成为问题地区的减排政策策略。一种策略是通过实施两种“树木捕获”系统方案来降低畜牧管理系统的排放源强度——在房屋下风处设置树带以及在树下管理牲畜。这种减排可被描述为一种“农场内”减排政策,因为氨被“阻止”在农场边界外扩散。第二种策略是通过两种造林方案,即分别增加25%和50%的造林面积,对高氨排放区域实施造林政策。两种策略都利用树木拦截氨排放,以保护半自然区域。农场内减排方案显示,全国范围内半自然区域的氮沉降减少了0.14%(0.2千吨氮-氨氧化物)至2.2%(3.15千吨氮-氨氧化物)。减轻牛猪舍排放的方案减排效果最为显著。造林策略显示,在造林面积分别增加25%和50%的情况下,全国范围内的氮沉降分别减少了6%(8.4千吨氮-氨氧化物)至11%(15.7千吨氮-氨氧化物)。种植树木增加的捕获量还显示出减少远距离影响的额外益处,包括湿沉降减少高达3.7千吨氮-氨氧化物(4.6%)以及从英国的输出减少高达8.3千吨氮-氨氧化物(6.8%)。