Boillot François, Serrano Laetitia, Muwonga Jeremie, Kabuayi Jean Pierre, Kambale Alain, Mutaka Fidèle, Fujiwara Paula I, Decosas Josef, Peeters Martine, Delaporte Eric
*Alter-Santé Internationale & Développement, Montpellier, France;†Unité Mixte Internationale 233-Institut de la Recherche pour le Développement/Université de Montpellier, Montpellier cedex 05, France (WHO collaborative centre for HIV resistance);‡Ministère de la santé, Kinshasa Gombe and Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo;§International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), Paris, France; and‖HERA, Health Research for Action, Laarstrat 43, Reet, Belgium.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016 Jan 1;71(1):e9-15. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000844.
As part of its policy to shift monitoring of antiretroviral therapy (ART) to primary health care (PHC) workers, the Ministry of Health of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) tested the feasibility of using dried blood spots (DBS) for viral load (VL) quantification and genotypic drug resistance testing in off-site high-throughput laboratories.
DBS samples from adults on ART were collected in 13 decentralized PHC facilities in the Nord-Kivu province and shipped during program quarterly supervision to a reference laboratory 2000 km away, where VL was quantified with a commercial assay (m2000rt, Abbott). A second DBS was sent to a World Health Organization (WHO)-accredited laboratory for repeat VL quantification on a subset of samples with a generic assay (Biocentric) and genotypic drug resistance testing when VL >1000 copies per milliliter.
Constraints arose because of an interruption in national laboratory funding rather than to technical or logistic problems. All samples were assessed by both VL assays to allow ART adjustment. Median DBS turnaround time was 37 days (interquartile range: 9-59). Assays performed unequally with DBS, impacting clinical decisions, quality assurance, and overall cost-effectiveness. Based on m2000rt or generic assay, 31.3% of patients were on virological failure (VF) and 14.8% presented resistance mutations versus 50.3% and 15.4%, respectively.
This study confirms that current technologies involving DBS make virological monitoring of ART possible at PHC level, including in challenging environments, provided organizational issues are addressed. Adequate core funding of HIV laboratories and adapted choice of VL assays require urgent attention to control resistance to ART as coverage expands.
作为将抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)监测工作转移至初级卫生保健(PHC)工作人员的政策的一部分,刚果民主共和国(DRC)卫生部在异地高通量实验室中测试了使用干血斑(DBS)进行病毒载量(VL)定量和基因型耐药性检测的可行性。
从北基伍省13个分散的初级卫生保健机构收集接受ART治疗的成人的DBS样本,并在项目季度监督期间运往2000公里外的参考实验室,在那里使用商业检测方法(m2000rt,雅培公司)对VL进行定量。将第二份DBS样本送至世界卫生组织(WHO)认可的实验室,对一部分样本使用通用检测方法(Biocentric)重复进行VL定量,并在VL>1000拷贝/毫升时进行基因型耐药性检测。
出现限制因素是由于国家实验室资金中断,而非技术或后勤问题。对所有样本均采用两种VL检测方法进行评估,以调整ART治疗方案。DBS样本的中位周转时间为37天(四分位间距:9 - 59天)。两种检测方法对DBS样本的检测结果不一致,影响了临床决策、质量保证和总体成本效益。基于m2000rt或通用检测方法,分别有31.3%和50.3%的患者出现病毒学失败(VF),14.8%和15.4%的患者出现耐药突变。
本研究证实,只要解决组织问题,目前涉及DBS的技术能够在初级卫生保健层面实现ART的病毒学监测,包括在具有挑战性的环境中。随着治疗覆盖范围的扩大,为控制对ART的耐药性,迫切需要对HIV实验室提供充足的核心资金,并合理选择VL检测方法。