Baek Ji Sun, Ahn Jung Hyo, Jang Sun Young, Chee Elaine, Jang Jae Woo
*Department of Ophthalmology, Kim's Eye Hospital, Myung-Gok Eye Research Institute, Konyang University College of Medicine, Seoul †Department of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Pusan ‡Department of Ophthalmology, Soonchunhyang Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea §Singapore National Eye Centre, Third Hospital Ave, Singapore.
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Oct;26(7):2174-6. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001984.
The objective of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes between interrupted and continuous buried suture methods in double eyelid blepharoplasty in Koreans.
Medical records of 204 patients (392 eyes) who underwent double eyelid operation by buried suture method and who were followed up for at least more than 3 months were reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the buried suture method; an interrupted group (88 patients) and a continuous group (116 patients).
The rate of loss of formed double eyelid is 19.3 % (17 of 88 patients) in interrupted buried method and 8.6 % (10 of 116 patients) in continuous group (P = 0.026). One patient experienced an exposure of suture knot in a continuous group, whereas 5 patients experienced an exposure of suture knot and 1 patient suffered from granuloma in an interrupted group (P = 0.021).
The continuous buried suture method has a lower rate of the loss of double folds and less complication than the interrupted buried suture method for double fold formation in Koreans.
本研究的目的是比较韩国人双眼皮成形术中间断埋线法和连续埋线法的手术效果。
回顾了204例（392只眼）采用埋线法行双眼皮手术且随访至少3个月以上患者的病历。根据埋线方法将患者分为两组：间断组（88例患者）和连续组（116例患者）。
间断埋线法中形成的双眼皮消失率为19.3%（88例患者中的17例），连续组为8.6%（116例患者中的10例）（P = 0.026）。连续组有1例患者出现缝线结外露，而间断组有5例患者出现缝线结外露，1例患者出现肉芽肿（P = 0.021）。
在韩国人双眼皮成形术中，连续埋线法比间断埋线法形成双眼皮消失率更低，并发症更少。
