Wessman Brian T, Sona Carrie, Schallom Marilyn
Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
Division of Emergency Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
J Intensive Care Med. 2017 Jan;32(1):68-76. doi: 10.1177/0885066615606063. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
With population aging and growth, use of critical care medicine at the end of life continues to rise, while many critical care providers are not adequately trained regarding goals of care/end-of-life (GOC/EOL) issues. A multidisciplinary intensive care unit (ICU) team intervention regarding GOC/EOL communication will enhance the clinical abilities of all critical care providers when discussing GOC/EOL issues and increase ICU staff comfort level while improving transitions for patients to a comfort care approach.
This study was a preintervention/postintervention survey evaluation.
This study was conducted at an academic tertiary surgical burn trauma ICU.
The intervention was provided to nursing, ancillary staff, house staff, and attending physicians.
An initial survey was circulated among the critical care staff for baseline expectations, satisfaction, and understanding of GOC/EOL care. A robust intervention was begun including the creation of a multidisciplinary GOC/EOL team, communication tools for providers, patient-family pamphlets, standardized EOL order sets, and formalized didactic sessions. Subsequently, the same survey was circulated and compared to baseline data.
Preintervention/postintervention survey data were reviewed and statistically analyzed.
Our survey response rate for preintervention/postintervention was 50.4% and 36.1%, respectively. The intervention generated heightened interest in improving family communication and provided focal direction to foster this growth. Based on the serial surveys regarding our intervention, statistically significant staff improvements were seen in "work stress" (P = .04), "EOL information" (P = .006), and "space allotment" (P = .001). Improved congruence of families and health care providers regarding decision over intensity of care was also noted.
We created a novel unit-based multidisciplinary program for improved EOL/GOC approaches in the critical care setting. A similarly formatted program could be adapted by other ICUs. Benefits of such a program include improving caregivers' perceptions regarding EOL/GOC issues and fostering critical care team growth.
随着人口老龄化和增长,临终时重症监护医学的使用持续增加,而许多重症监护提供者在护理目标/临终(GOC/EOL)问题方面未得到充分培训。关于GOC/EOL沟通的多学科重症监护病房(ICU)团队干预将提高所有重症监护提供者在讨论GOC/EOL问题时的临床能力,并提高ICU工作人员的舒适度,同时改善患者向舒适护理方式的过渡。
本研究是一项干预前/干预后调查评估。
本研究在一家学术性三级外科烧伤创伤ICU进行。
干预对象为护士、辅助人员、住院医师和主治医生。
向重症监护人员发放初始调查问卷,以了解他们对GOC/EOL护理的基线期望、满意度和理解。开始进行有力的干预,包括组建多学科GOC/EOL团队、为提供者提供沟通工具、患者家属宣传册、标准化的EOL医嘱集以及正规的教学课程。随后,发放相同的调查问卷并与基线数据进行比较。
对干预前/干预后调查数据进行审查和统计分析。
我们干预前/干预后的调查回复率分别为50.4%和36.1%。该干预提高了对改善家庭沟通的兴趣,并为促进这种增长提供了重点方向。根据关于我们干预的系列调查,在“工作压力”(P = 0.04)、“EOL信息”(P = 0.006)和“空间分配”(P = 0.001)方面,工作人员有统计学意义的改善。还注意到在护理强度决策方面,家庭与医疗保健提供者之间的一致性有所提高。
我们创建了一个新颖的基于病房的多学科项目,以改善重症监护环境中的EOL/GOC方法。其他ICU可以采用类似形式的项目。这样一个项目的好处包括改善护理人员对EOL/GOC问题的认知,并促进重症监护团队的成长。