• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

布比卡因与布比卡因联合芬太尼用于蛛网膜下腔麻醉下脐下手术的比较。

Comparison of levobupivacaine and levobupivacaine with fentanyl in infraumbilical surgeries under spinal anaesthesia.

作者信息

Attri Joginder Pal, Kaur Gagandeep, Kaur Sarabjit, Kaur Ravneet, Mohan Brij, Kashyap Kamaljyoti

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab, India.

出版信息

Anesth Essays Res. 2015 May-Aug;9(2):178-84. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.152148.

DOI:10.4103/0259-1162.152148
PMID:26417124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4563977/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intrathecal opioids added to low dose local anesthetics in spinal anaesthesia intensifies sensory block without affecting sympathetic blockade. Aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intrathecal levobupivacaine plain versus levobupivacaine plus fentanyl in infraumbilical surgeries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a prospective randomized double blind study, 100 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists grades I and II of either sex, 20-65 years of age were included after approval from the Ethics Committee. Informed consent was taken and patients were randomly divided into two groups of 50 each, to receive either 2 ml of 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine (group L) or 2 ml of 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine + 25 μg fentanyl (group LF) intrathecally. Patients were monitored for sensory and motor block characteristics, postoperative analgesia, haemodynamics and side effects and complications for 24 h.

RESULTS

Onset of sensory block and time to maximum sensory block was rapid in group LF (4.8 ± 1.50 and 8.46 ± 1.87 min) as compared to group L (7.6 ± 1.46 and 15.80 ± 2.43 min) (P < 0.000). Maximum sensory block was T6 in group LF and T8 in group L. Maximum Bromage score was 2 in both groups but was achieved earlier in group LF (P < 0.000). Duration of sensory and motor block was significantly prolonged in group LF (270.98 ± 28.60 and 188.52 ± 9.81 min) as compared to group L (197.58 ± 11.20 and 152.76 ± 9.79 min). Total duration of analgesia was also prolonged in group LF (265.16 ± 26.18 min) as compared to group L (168.16 ± 11.08 min). Patients remained haemodynamically stable and side effects and complications were comparable in both groups. Data was analyzed using "Chi-square test" and "unpaired t-test."

CONCLUSION

Addition of fentanyl to levobupivacaine leads to early onset and prolonged duration of sensory and motor block as well as postoperative analgesia with stable haemodynamics and minimal side effects.

摘要

背景

在脊髓麻醉中,鞘内注射阿片类药物与低剂量局部麻醉药联合使用可增强感觉阻滞,而不影响交感神经阻滞。目的是评估单纯鞘内注射左旋布比卡因与左旋布比卡因加芬太尼用于脐下手术的安全性和有效性。

材料与方法

在一项前瞻性随机双盲研究中,经伦理委员会批准,纳入100例年龄在20 - 65岁之间、美国麻醉医师协会分级为I级和II级的男女患者。获取知情同意后,将患者随机分为两组,每组50例,分别鞘内注射2 ml 0.5%等比重左旋布比卡因(L组)或2 ml 0.5%等比重左旋布比卡因 + 25 μg芬太尼(LF组)。对患者进行24小时的感觉和运动阻滞特征、术后镇痛、血流动力学以及副作用和并发症的监测。

结果

与L组(7.6 ± 1.46和15.80 ± 2.43分钟)相比,LF组的感觉阻滞起效时间和达到最大感觉阻滞的时间更快(4.8 ± 1.50和8.46 ± 1.87分钟)(P < 0.000)。LF组的最大感觉阻滞平面为T6,L组为T8。两组的最大布罗麻评分均为2,但LF组更早达到(P < 0.000)。与L组(197.58 ± 11.20和152.76 ± 9.79分钟)相比,LF组的感觉和运动阻滞持续时间显著延长(270.98 ± 28.60和188.52 ± 9.81分钟)。LF组的总镇痛持续时间也比L组延长(265.16 ± 26.18分钟 vs 168.16 ± 11.08分钟)。患者血流动力学保持稳定,两组的副作用和并发症相当。数据采用“卡方检验”和“非配对t检验”进行分析。

结论

左旋布比卡因中添加芬太尼可导致感觉和运动阻滞以及术后镇痛的起效提前和持续时间延长,同时血流动力学稳定,副作用最小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc3a/4563977/f896edfbe611/AER-9-178-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc3a/4563977/7793f8f7bc2a/AER-9-178-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc3a/4563977/f896edfbe611/AER-9-178-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc3a/4563977/7793f8f7bc2a/AER-9-178-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc3a/4563977/f896edfbe611/AER-9-178-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of levobupivacaine and levobupivacaine with fentanyl in infraumbilical surgeries under spinal anaesthesia.布比卡因与布比卡因联合芬太尼用于蛛网膜下腔麻醉下脐下手术的比较。
Anesth Essays Res. 2015 May-Aug;9(2):178-84. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.152148.
2
Comparison of block characteristics of intrathecal isobaric levobupivacaine versus isobaric ropivacaine for infra-umbilical surgeries in school-age children: A prospective randomised double-blind study.学龄儿童脐下手术中鞘内等比重左旋布比卡因与等比重罗哌卡因阻滞特性的比较:一项前瞻性随机双盲研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Sep;65(9):662-668. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_242_21. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
3
Levobupivacaine for labor analgesia.左旋布比卡因用于分娩镇痛。
Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Sep-Dec;10(3):493-496. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.179309.
4
Comparison of Levobupivacaine and Levobupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine in Infraumbilical Surgeries Under Spinal Anesthesia.左旋布比卡因与左旋布比卡因联合右美托咪定用于脊髓麻醉下脐下手术的比较。
Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):251-255. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_227_17.
5
A randomized clinical study comparing spinal anesthesia with isobaric levobupivacaine with fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl in elective cesarean sections.一项在择期剖宫产中比较等比重左旋布比卡因与芬太尼腰麻和重比重布比卡因与芬太尼腰麻的随机临床研究。
Anesth Essays Res. 2015 Jan-Apr;9(1):57-62. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.150169.
6
Evaluating the Efficacy of Tramadol as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Isobaric Levobupivacaine for Elective Infraumbilical Surgeries.评估曲马多作为鞘内等比重左旋布比卡因辅助药物用于择期脐下手术的疗效。
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):572-577. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_59_17.
7
Comparison of Intrathecal Levobupivacaine and Levobupivacaine plus Fentanyl for Cesarean Section.剖宫产术中鞘内注射左旋布比卡因与左旋布比卡因加芬太尼的比较
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Apr-Jun;11(2):495-498. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_16_17.
8
A Comparison Between Intrathecal Levobupivacaine and Bupivacaine for Quality and Safety During Infraumbilical Surgeries.鞘内注射左旋布比卡因与布比卡因用于脐下手术质量和安全性的比较
Cureus. 2022 Oct 22;14(10):e30590. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30590. eCollection 2022 Oct.
9
Spinal anesthesia for transurethral resection operations: levobupivacaine with or without fentanyl.经尿道切除术的脊髓麻醉:左旋布比卡因加或不加芬太尼。
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Feb;20(4):547-52.
10
Comparative evaluation of anaesthetic efficacy and haemodynamic effects of a combination of isobaric bupivacaine with buprenorphine vs. isobaric levobupivacaine with buprenorphine for spinal anaesthesia - A double blinded randomised clinical trial.等比重布比卡因与丁丙诺啡联合用药对比等比重左旋布比卡因与丁丙诺啡联合用药用于脊髓麻醉的麻醉效果及血流动力学效应的比较评价——一项双盲随机临床试验
Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Jan;63(1):49-54. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_667_17.

引用本文的文献

1
Analgesia Quality and Duration of Fentanyl and Sufentanil Added to Bupivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia in Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Double-Blind Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial.芬太尼和舒芬太尼添加于布比卡因用于腹股沟疝修补术脊髓麻醉的镇痛质量和持续时间:一项双盲平行随机对照试验
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 27;8(8):e71116. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.71116. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Comparison of Postoperative Analgesia Between Intrathecal Nalbuphine and Intrathecal Fentanyl in Infraumbilical Surgeries: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.脐下手术中鞘内注射纳布啡与鞘内注射芬太尼术后镇痛效果比较:一项双盲随机对照试验
Cureus. 2024 Apr 17;16(4):e58503. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58503. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Low-dose levobupivacaine plus fentanyl combination for spinal anesthesia in anorectal surgery.低剂量左旋布比卡因联合芬太尼用于肛肠手术脊髓麻醉
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2015 Nov-Dec;65(6):461-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.01.007. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
2
Comparison of two different doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine for transurethral endoscopic surgery.两种不同剂量鞘内注射左旋布比卡因用于经尿道内镜手术的比较。
Eurasian J Med. 2011 Aug;43(2):103-8. doi: 10.5152/eajm.2011.23.
3
Comparison of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with sufentanil, fentanyl, or placebo for elective caesarean section: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study.
Safety and effectiveness of adding fentanyl or sufentanil to spinal anesthesia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
芬太尼或舒芬太尼联合椎管内麻醉的安全性和有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2023 Mar-Apr;73(2):198-216. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.10.010. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
4
Comparative evaluation of anaesthetic efficacy and haemodynamic effects of a combination of isobaric bupivacaine with buprenorphine vs. isobaric levobupivacaine with buprenorphine for spinal anaesthesia - A double blinded randomised clinical trial.等比重布比卡因与丁丙诺啡联合用药对比等比重左旋布比卡因与丁丙诺啡联合用药用于脊髓麻醉的麻醉效果及血流动力学效应的比较评价——一项双盲随机临床试验
Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Jan;63(1):49-54. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_667_17.
5
Comparative Study of Constant Dose Intrathecal Hypobaric Levobupivacaine with Varying Baricities in Lower Limb Surgeries.下肢手术中不同比重的恒量鞘内低压左旋布比卡因的比较研究
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):642-646. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.204207.
鞘内注射左旋布比卡因联合舒芬太尼、芬太尼或安慰剂用于择期剖宫产的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照研究。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2013 Dec;75:64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2013.09.003.
4
Comparison of levobupivacaine alone and in combination with fentanyl and sufentanil in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate.左旋布比卡因单独使用以及与芬太尼和舒芬太尼联合使用在前列腺经尿道切除术患者中的比较。
J Res Med Sci. 2013 May;18(5):378-82.
5
Low dose levobupivacaine 0.5% with fentanyl in spinal anaesthesia for transurethral resection of prostate surgery.低剂量0.5%左旋布比卡因联合芬太尼用于经尿道前列腺切除术的脊髓麻醉。
J Res Med Sci. 2011 Jan;16(1):68-73.
6
Comparison of the effects of intrathecal different dosage of levobupivacaine in elective day-case arthroscopy of the knee.鞘内注射不同剂量左旋布比卡因在择期日间膝关节镜检查中的效果比较。
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jun;20(5):703-8.
7
Spinal anesthesia for transurethral resection operations: levobupivacaine with or without fentanyl.经尿道切除术的脊髓麻醉:左旋布比卡因加或不加芬太尼。
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Feb;20(4):547-52.
8
The combination of low-dose levobupivacaine and fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia in ambulatory inguinal herniorrhaphy.低剂量左旋布比卡因与芬太尼联合用于门诊腹股沟疝修补术的脊髓麻醉。
J Int Med Res. 2008 Nov-Dec;36(6):1287-92. doi: 10.1177/147323000803600616.
9
Levobupivacaine and fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia: a randomized trial.左旋布比卡因与芬太尼用于脊髓麻醉:一项随机试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005 Dec;22(12):899-903. doi: 10.1017/S0265021505001523.
10
Peripheral nerve blocks result in superior recovery profile compared with general anesthesia in outpatient knee arthroscopy.在门诊膝关节关节镜检查中,与全身麻醉相比,周围神经阻滞可带来更好的恢复情况。
Anesth Analg. 2005 Apr;100(4):976-981. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000150944.95158.B9.