O'Connor Kelly M, Rittenhouse Chadwick D, Millspaugh Joshua J, Rittenhouse Tracy A G
Wildlife and Fisheries Conservation Center, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Connecticut , Storrs, CT , USA.
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences, University of Missouri , Columbia, MO , USA.
PeerJ. 2015 Sep 22;3:e1256. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1256. eCollection 2015.
Box turtles (Terrapene carolina) are widely distributed but vulnerable to population decline across their range. Using distance sampling, morphometric data, and an index of carapace damage, we surveyed three-toed box turtles (Terrapene carolina triunguis) at 2 sites in central Missouri, and compared differences in detection probabilities when transects were walked by one or two observers. Our estimated turtle densities within forested cover was less at the Thomas S. Baskett Wildlife Research and Education Center, a site dominated by eastern hardwood forest (d = 1.85 turtles/ha, 95% CI [1.13, 3.03]) than at the Prairie Fork Conservation Area, a site containing a mix of open field and hardwood forest (d = 4.14 turtles/ha, 95% CI [1.99, 8.62]). Turtles at Baskett were significantly older and larger than turtles at Prairie Fork. Damage to the carapace did not differ significantly between the 2 populations despite the more prevalent habitat management including mowing and prescribed fire at Prairie Fork. We achieved improved estimates of density using two rather than one observer at Prairie Fork, but negligible differences in density estimates between the two methods at Baskett. Error associated with probability of detection decreased at both sites with the addition of a second observer. We provide demographic data on three-toed box turtles that suggest the use of a range of habitat conditions by three-toed box turtles. This case study suggests that habitat management practices and their impacts on habitat composition may be a cause of the differences observed in our focal populations of turtles.
箱龟(卡罗莱纳箱龟)分布广泛,但在其分布范围内易受种群数量下降的影响。我们使用距离抽样、形态测量数据和背甲损伤指数,对密苏里州中部两个地点的三趾箱龟(卡罗莱纳箱龟三趾亚种)进行了调查,并比较了由一名或两名观察者行走样线时检测概率的差异。在以东部硬木林为主的托马斯·S·巴斯克特野生动物研究与教育中心,我们估计森林覆盖区内的龟密度较低(d = 1.85只/公顷,95%置信区间[1.13, 3.03]),而在包含开阔田野和硬木林混合区域的草原叉保护区,龟密度较高(d = 4.14只/公顷,95%置信区间[1.99, 8.62])。巴斯克特的龟比草原叉的龟年龄显著更大、体型也更大。尽管草原叉有更普遍的栖息地管理措施,包括割草和规定火烧,但两个种群背甲的损伤情况并无显著差异。在草原叉,使用两名观察者而非一名观察者时,我们对密度的估计得到了改善,但在巴斯克特,两种方法在密度估计上的差异可忽略不计。在两个地点,增加第二名观察者后,与检测概率相关的误差均有所降低。我们提供了三趾箱龟的种群统计学数据,表明三趾箱龟会利用一系列的栖息地条件。本案例研究表明,栖息地管理措施及其对栖息地组成的影响可能是我们所关注的龟类种群中观察到差异的一个原因。