Departamento de Bioquímica, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, Tlalpan, Mexico.
Instituto de Bioquímica Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
FEBS J. 2016 Jan;283(1):54-73. doi: 10.1111/febs.13535. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
Efforts to understand the mechanistic principles driving cancer metabolism and proliferation have been lately governed by genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic studies. This paper analyzes the caveats of these approaches. As molecular biology's central dogma proposes a unidirectional flux of information from genes to mRNA to proteins, it has frequently been assumed that monitoring the changes in the gene sequences and in mRNA and protein contents is sufficient to explain complex cellular processes. Such a stance commonly disregards that post-translational modifications can alter the protein function/activity and also that regulatory mechanisms enter into action, to coordinate the protein activities of pathways/cellular processes, in order to keep the cellular homeostasis. Hence, the actual protein activities (as enzymes/transporters/receptors) and their regulatory mechanisms ultimately dictate the final outcomes of a pathway/cellular process. In this regard, it is here documented that the mRNA levels of many metabolic enzymes and transcriptional factors have no correlation with the respective protein contents and activities. The validity of current clinical mRNA-based tests and proposed metabolite biomarkers for cancer detection/prognosis is also discussed. Therefore, it is proposed that, to achieve a thorough understanding of the modifications undergone by proliferating cancer cells, it is mandatory to experimentally analyze the cellular processes at the functional level. This could be achieved (a) locally, by examining the actual protein activities in the cell and their kinetic properties (or at least kinetically characterize the most controlling steps of the pathway/cellular process); (b) systemically, by analyzing the main fluxes of the pathway/cellular process, and how they are modulated by metabolites, all which should contribute to comprehending the regulatory mechanisms that have been altered in cancer cells. By adopting a more holistic approach it may become possible to improve the design of therapeutic strategies that would target cancer cells more specifically.
最近,人们努力从基因组、转录组和蛋白质组学研究方面来理解驱动癌症代谢和增殖的机制原理。本文分析了这些方法的局限性。由于分子生物学的中心法则提出信息从基因到 mRNA 再到蛋白质的单向流动,因此人们常常假设监测基因序列以及 mRNA 和蛋白质含量的变化足以解释复杂的细胞过程。这种观点通常忽略了翻译后修饰可以改变蛋白质的功能/活性,以及调节机制会发挥作用,以协调途径/细胞过程中的蛋白质活性,从而保持细胞内稳态。因此,实际的蛋白质活性(如酶/转运蛋白/受体)及其调节机制最终决定了途径/细胞过程的最终结果。在这方面,本文记录了许多代谢酶和转录因子的 mRNA 水平与相应的蛋白质含量和活性没有相关性。还讨论了当前基于 mRNA 的临床测试和提议的代谢物生物标志物用于癌症检测/预后的有效性。因此,有人提出,为了彻底了解增殖癌细胞所经历的修饰,必须在功能水平上对细胞过程进行实验分析。这可以通过以下方式实现:(a) 局部地,通过检查细胞中实际的蛋白质活性及其动力学特性(或者至少对途径/细胞过程的最关键步骤进行动力学表征);(b) 系统性地,通过分析途径/细胞过程的主要通量以及它们如何被代谢物调节,所有这些都有助于理解癌症细胞中改变的调节机制。通过采用更全面的方法,有可能改进针对癌细胞更具特异性的治疗策略的设计。