Nagpal B N, Ghosh S K, Eapen Alex, Srivastava Aruna, Sharma M C, Singh V P, Parashar B D, Prakash Shri, Mendki M J, Tikar S N, Saxena Rekha, Gupta Sanjeev, Tiwari S N, Ojha V P, Ravindran K John, Ganesan K, Rao A N, Sharma R S, Tuli N R, Yadav N K, Vijayaraghavan R, Dua V K, Dash A P, Kaushik M P, Joshi P L, Valecha Neena
National Institute of Malaria Research, New Delhi, India.
J Vector Borne Dis. 2015 Sep;52(3):224-31.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Aedes mosquito control has gained much importance nowadays in view of rise in number of reported cases of dengue and chikungunya in India and other countries. In the present study, C21 attracticide (containing a pheromone and an insect growth regulator—IGR, developed by Defence Research and Development Establishment (DRDE), Gwalior, India was tested for its feasibility for surveillance and control of Aedes mosquito in a multicentric mode from October 2007 to June 2012 in urban (Delhi, and Bengaluru district, Karnataka) and suburban (Alappuzha district, Kerala) settings of the country in three phases.
Across the randomly selected households in each study area, two to four containers treated with attracticide (experimental) and untreated (control) were placed and monitored by trained surveillance workers on weekly/ fortnightly basis for determining the presence of eggs, larvae and pupae. Container positivity, percent larvae, egg and pupae collected were determined during different phases and analyzed statistically using SPSS 18.0.
Container positivity was found statistically significant at Bengaluru and Alappuzha, Kerala while in Delhi, it was found non-significant. Eggs collected from experimental containers were significantly higher in comparison to control at all the locations except Delhi. Also larvae collected from control containers were significantly higher at all the locations except Bengaluru. Pupae collected from control containers remained significantly higher at all the locations as no pupal formation was recorded from experimental containers.
INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: The use of C21 attracticide hampered pupal formation, thus inhibiting adult population in the study areas. The study established that C21 attracticide was efficacious in the field conditions and has potential for use in surveillance and management of dengue and chikungunya mosquitoes.
鉴于印度及其他国家登革热和基孔肯雅热报告病例数的增加,如今伊蚊控制变得极为重要。在本研究中,2007年10月至2012年6月期间,在印度瓜廖尔国防研究与发展机构(DRDE)研发的C21引诱杀虫剂(含有一种信息素和一种昆虫生长调节剂——IGR)在该国城市(德里和卡纳塔克邦班加罗尔区)和郊区(喀拉拉邦阿拉普扎区)以多中心模式分三个阶段进行了伊蚊监测和控制可行性测试。
在每个研究区域随机选择的家庭中,放置两到四个用引诱杀虫剂处理过的容器(实验组)和未处理的容器(对照组),由训练有素的监测人员每周/每两周监测一次,以确定是否存在卵、幼虫和蛹。在不同阶段测定容器阳性率、收集的幼虫、卵和蛹的百分比,并使用SPSS 18.0进行统计分析。
在班加罗尔和喀拉拉邦的阿拉普扎发现容器阳性率具有统计学意义,而在德里则无统计学意义。除德里外,在所有地点从实验组容器收集的卵均显著高于对照组。同样,除班加罗尔外,在所有地点从对照组容器收集的幼虫均显著更高。由于实验组容器未记录到蛹的形成,在所有地点从对照组容器收集的蛹仍显著更高。
使用C21引诱杀虫剂阻碍了蛹的形成,从而抑制了研究区域内的成虫数量。该研究表明,C21引诱杀虫剂在野外条件下有效,具有用于登革热和基孔肯雅热蚊子监测和管理的潜力。