University of Montreal Public Health Research Institute, Montreal, Canada.
French Institute For Research on sustainable Development (IRD), IRD Paris Descartes University (CEPED), Paris Sorbonne Cities University, Erl Inserm Sagesud, Paris, France.
Infect Dis Poverty. 2018 Sep 3;7(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s40249-018-0477-5.
Over half the world's human populations are currently at risk from vector-borne diseases (VBDs), and the heaviest burden is borne by the world's poorest people, communities, and countries. The aim of this study was to conduct a review on VBD interventions relevant to housing and hygiene (including sanitation and waste management) in urban areas.
We conducted a scoping review, which involved systematically searching peer-reviewed and grey literature published between 2000 and 2016 using five scientific databases and one database for grey literature. Different data extraction tools were used for data coding and extraction. We assessed the quality of each study using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and extracted descriptive characteristics and data about implementation process and transferability from all studies using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication and ASTAIRE (a tool for analyzing the transferability of health promotion interventions) tools. We reviewed 44 studies. Overall, the studies were judged to be of high risk for bias. Our results suggest multifaceted interventions, particularly community-based interventions, have the potential to achieve wider and more sustained effects than do standard vertical single-component programs. The evaluations of multifaceted interventions tend to include integrated evaluations, using not only entomological indicators but also acceptability and sustainability indicators.
This review highlighted the important need for higher quality research in VBDs and improved and standardized reporting of interventions. Significant research gaps were found regarding qualitative research and implementation research, and results highlighted the need for more interventions focus on sanitation and hygiene practices.
目前,全世界一半以上的人口面临着媒介传播疾病(VBD)的威胁,而世界上最贫困的人群、社区和国家承受着最大的负担。本研究旨在对与城市地区住房和卫生(包括环境卫生和废物管理)相关的 VBD 干预措施进行综述。
我们进行了一次范围界定审查,使用五个科学数据库和一个灰色文献数据库,对 2000 年至 2016 年间发表的同行评审和灰色文献进行了系统搜索。使用不同的数据提取工具对数据进行编码和提取。我们使用混合方法评估工具(Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool)对每项研究的质量进行评估,并使用干预描述和复制模板(Template for Intervention Description and Replication)和 ASTAIRE(用于分析健康促进干预措施可转移性的工具)工具,从所有研究中提取实施过程和可转移性的描述性特征和数据。我们共审查了 44 项研究。总体而言,这些研究被认为存在较高的偏倚风险。我们的研究结果表明,多方面的干预措施,特别是以社区为基础的干预措施,有可能产生更广泛和更持久的效果,而不是标准的垂直单一组成部分方案。多方面干预措施的评估往往包括综合评估,不仅使用昆虫学指标,还使用可接受性和可持续性指标。
本综述强调了在 VBD 领域需要更高质量的研究,并改进和标准化干预措施的报告。在定性研究和实施研究方面发现了重大的研究差距,结果强调需要更多关注卫生和环境卫生实践的干预措施。