Fonseca Alexandre Siqueira Franco, Goldenberg Dov Charles, Stocchero Guilherme Flosi, Luiz Arthur Vicentini Costa, Gemperli Rolf
From the *Division of Plastic Surgery, †Department of Surgery, Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School; ‡Department of Plastic Surgery at Sirio Libanês Hospital; §Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Oct;77(4):433-7. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000623.
The continental size of some countries and heterogeneous hospital network prevents patients who live in remote areas from getting adequate initial assessment of facial trauma. The authors present an alternative model for trauma assessment by videoconference via smartphones and analyze the concordance between telemedicine and face-to-face management.
Fifty patients with either a confirmed or suspected diagnosis of facial trauma were independently evaluated by 2 teams of physicians: Face-to-face and telemedicine-based. The face-to-face team attended patients at bedside (physical examination and computed tomography scan analysis). The telemedicine team consisted of a general surgery resident on duty in the emergency room and a plastic surgeon researcher remotely communicating via smartphones. Both teams answered a questionnaire, which contained data concerning patient's epidemiology, physical examination, computed tomography (CT) scan findings, and treatment option to be followed. Data were analyzed and compared regarding the similarity of answers.
The sample studied was consistent with the literature, showing a predominance of young males. Traffic accidents and personal violence were the main causes of trauma. The concurrency of answers for physical examination findings was considered substantial (κ = 0.720). For CT scan findings, it was almost perfect (κ = 0.899); for defining the treatment option, it was almost perfect (κ = 0.891). High concurrency of face CT scan findings was observed after we calculated the positive predictive value (89.9%), negative predictive value (99.3%), sensitivity (94.2%), specificity (98.8%), and accuracy (98.3%).
The proposed model to facial assessment trauma by videoconference via smartphones is feasible, showing high concordance level with face-to-face assessment.
一些国家地域辽阔,医院网络参差不齐,这使得偏远地区的患者无法获得对面部创伤的充分初步评估。作者提出了一种通过智能手机视频会议进行创伤评估的替代模式,并分析了远程医疗与面对面管理之间的一致性。
50例确诊或疑似面部创伤的患者由两组医生独立评估:面对面评估组和基于远程医疗的评估组。面对面评估组在床边对患者进行检查(体格检查和计算机断层扫描分析)。远程医疗组由一名急诊室值班的普通外科住院医师和一名通过智能手机进行远程交流的整形外科研究员组成。两组均回答了一份问卷,问卷包含有关患者的流行病学、体格检查、计算机断层扫描(CT)结果以及后续治疗方案的数据。对答案的相似性进行了分析和比较。
研究样本与文献一致,显示年轻男性占主导。交通事故和人身暴力是创伤的主要原因。体格检查结果的答案一致性被认为较高(κ = 0.720)。对于CT扫描结果,一致性几乎完美(κ = 0.899);对于确定治疗方案,一致性几乎完美(κ = 0.891)。在计算阳性预测值(89.9%)、阴性预测值(99.3%)、敏感性(94.2%)、特异性(98.8%)和准确性(98.3%)后,观察到面部CT扫描结果的高度一致性。
通过智能手机视频会议对面部创伤进行评估的提议模式是可行的,与面对面评估显示出高度的一致性。