• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西投票分布中的典型事实。

Stylized Facts in Brazilian Vote Distributions.

作者信息

Calvão Angelo Mondaini, Crokidakis Nuno, Anteneodo Celia

机构信息

Department of Physics, PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Institute of Physics, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Sep 29;10(9):e0137732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137732. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0137732
PMID:26418863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4587976/
Abstract

Elections, specially in countries such as Brazil, with an electorate of the order of 100 million people, yield large-scale data-sets embodying valuable information on the dynamics through which individuals influence each other and make choices. In this work we perform an extensive analysis of data sets available for Brazilian proportional elections of legislators and city councilors throughout the period 1970-2014, which embraces two distinct political regimes: a military regime followed by a democratic one. We perform a comparative analysis of elections for legislative positions, in different states and years, through the distribution p(v) of the number of candidates receiving v votes. We show the impact of the different political regimes on the vote distributions. Although p(v) has a common shape, with a scaling behavior, quantitative details change over time and from one electorate to another. In order to interpret the observed features, we propose a multi-species model consisting in a system of nonlinear differential equations, with values of the parameters that reflect the heterogeneity of candidates. In its simplest setting, the model can not explain the cutoff, formed by the most voted candidates, whose success is determined mainly by their peculiar, intrinsic characteristics, such as previous publicity. However, the modeling allows to interpret the scaling of p(v), yielding a predictor of the degree of feedback in the interactions of the electorate. Knowledge of the feedback is relevant beyond the context of elections, since a similar interactivity may occur for other social contagion processes in the same population.

摘要

选举,特别是在像巴西这样拥有约1亿选民的国家,会产生大规模数据集,其中包含有关个体相互影响和做出选择的动态过程的宝贵信息。在这项工作中,我们对1970年至2014年期间巴西立法者和市议员比例选举可用的数据集进行了广泛分析,这涵盖了两种不同的政治体制:军事体制之后是民主体制。我们通过获得v票的候选人数量的分布p(v),对不同州和年份的立法职位选举进行了比较分析。我们展示了不同政治体制对选票分布的影响。尽管p(v)具有共同的形状,呈现出标度行为,但定量细节会随时间以及从一个选区到另一个选区而变化。为了解释观察到的特征,我们提出了一个多物种模型,该模型由一个非线性微分方程组组成,其参数值反映了候选人的异质性。在其最简单的设定中,该模型无法解释由得票最多的候选人形成的截止情况,这些候选人的成功主要由其特殊的内在特征决定,比如先前的宣传。然而,该建模能够解释p(v)的标度,得出选民互动中反馈程度的预测指标。反馈的知识在选举背景之外也很重要,因为在同一人群中的其他社会传播过程可能会出现类似的互动性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196a/4587976/9d2a957df12d/pone.0137732.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196a/4587976/159caa8d3ec3/pone.0137732.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196a/4587976/85afbff0f77d/pone.0137732.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196a/4587976/28f5b44a251d/pone.0137732.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196a/4587976/8cb29ddacb67/pone.0137732.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196a/4587976/376fb9922a26/pone.0137732.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196a/4587976/9d2a957df12d/pone.0137732.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196a/4587976/159caa8d3ec3/pone.0137732.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196a/4587976/85afbff0f77d/pone.0137732.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196a/4587976/28f5b44a251d/pone.0137732.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196a/4587976/8cb29ddacb67/pone.0137732.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196a/4587976/376fb9922a26/pone.0137732.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196a/4587976/9d2a957df12d/pone.0137732.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Stylized Facts in Brazilian Vote Distributions.巴西投票分布中的典型事实。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 29;10(9):e0137732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137732. eCollection 2015.
2
Bayesian inference on proportional elections.比例选举中的贝叶斯推理。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 18;10(3):e0116924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116924. eCollection 2015.
3
The political gender gap: gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior.政治性别差距:预测投票行为的面部推断中的性别偏见。
PLoS One. 2008;3(10):e3666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003666. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
4
Voting contagion: Modeling and analysis of a century of U.S. presidential elections.投票传染:对一个世纪以来美国总统选举的建模与分析
PLoS One. 2017 May 18;12(5):e0177970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177970. eCollection 2017.
5
Tactical voting in plurality elections.多数制选举中的策略投票。
PLoS One. 2010 Sep 15;5(9):e12446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012446.
6
Brazilian women in politics.巴西政坛中的女性。
UFSI Rep. 1987(14):1-8.
7
The price of a vote: Diseconomy in proportional elections.投票的代价:比例选举中的不经济。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 22;13(8):e0201654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201654. eCollection 2018.
8
Entropic Analysis of Votes Expressed in Italian Elections between 1948 and 2018.1948年至2018年意大利选举中投票的熵分析。
Entropy (Basel). 2020 May 4;22(5):523. doi: 10.3390/e22050523.
9
Scaling and universality in proportional elections.比例选举中的规模与普遍性
Phys Rev Lett. 2007 Sep 28;99(13):138701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.138701. Epub 2007 Sep 25.
10
Facts versus values: why legislators vote against injury control laws.事实与价值观:立法者为何投票反对伤害控制法。
J Trauma. 1993 Nov;35(5):786-92; discussion 792-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Fundraising and vote distribution: A non-equilibrium statistical approach.筹资和投票分配:一种非平衡统计方法。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 30;14(10):e0223059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223059. eCollection 2019.
2
The price of a vote: Diseconomy in proportional elections.投票的代价:比例选举中的不经济。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 22;13(8):e0201654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201654. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Is the voter model a model for voters?投票者模型是针对投票者的模型吗?
Phys Rev Lett. 2014 Apr 18;112(15):158701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.158701.
2
Results on three predictions for July 2012 federal elections in Mexico based on past regularities.基于过去规律对2012年7月墨西哥联邦选举的三项预测结果。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 30;8(12):e82584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082584. eCollection 2013.
3
Engagement in the electoral processes: scaling laws and the role of political positions.参与选举过程:标度律与政治立场的作用
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2013 Aug;88(2):024802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.88.024802. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
4
Universality in voting behavior: an empirical analysis.投票行为的普遍性:实证分析。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1049. doi: 10.1038/srep01049. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
5
Statistical detection of systematic election irregularities.统计检测系统的选举违规行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 9;109(41):16469-73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210722109. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
6
Tactical voting in plurality elections.多数制选举中的策略投票。
PLoS One. 2010 Sep 15;5(9):e12446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012446.
7
Scaling and universality in proportional elections.比例选举中的规模与普遍性
Phys Rev Lett. 2007 Sep 28;99(13):138701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.138701. Epub 2007 Sep 25.
8
Spread of opinions and proportional voting.观点传播与比例投票
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006 Sep;74(3 Pt 2):036112. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.036112. Epub 2006 Sep 22.
9
k-core (bootstrap) percolation on complex networks: critical phenomena and nonlocal effects.复杂网络上的k核(自展)渗流:临界现象与非局部效应。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006 May;73(5 Pt 2):056101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.056101. Epub 2006 May 1.
10
A simple model of global cascades on random networks.随机网络上的全局级联的一个简单模型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 30;99(9):5766-71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.082090499.