• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估IV,一种预测重症急性胰腺炎死亡率和并发症的新评分系统。

The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV, a New Scoring System for Predicting Mortality and Complications of Severe Acute Pancreatitis.

作者信息

Mok Shaffer R S, Mohan Sachin, Elfant Adam B, Judge Thomas A

机构信息

From the Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ.

出版信息

Pancreas. 2015 Nov;44(8):1314-9. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000432.

DOI:10.1097/MPA.0000000000000432
PMID:26418901
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Severe acute pancreatitis is associated with significant morbidity/mortality; thus, the ability to predict hospital course is imperative. An updated version of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE), APACHE IV, has recently been validated. Unlike other versions, APACHE IV uses hepatobiliary parameters and accounts for multiple comorbid conditions and sedation. The intention of this study was to examine APACHE IV for predicting mortality and secondary outcomes for pancreatitis in a prospective cohort. In addition, we compared APACHE IV to APACHE II, Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis, and Ranson criterion.

METHODS

We prospectively collected physiologic parameters for each scoring system in 266 patients with severe acute pancreatitis from August 2011 to April 2014. Prognostic value of each score was determined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Among 266 patients, 59% were men, 52% were white, and 36.5% had alcohol-induced pancreatitis. Mortality occurred in 15 (5.6%), and an APACHE IV of 44 or greater predicted mortality in 100% of cases. The receiver operating characteristic curve for APACHE IV was 0.93 (confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.97); APACHE II, 0.87 (CI, 0.80-0.94); Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis, 0.86 (CI, 0.78-0.94); and Ranson criterion, 0.90 (CI, 0.94-0.96).

CONCLUSION

The APACHE IV is a valid means for predicting mortality and disease-related complications in acute pancreatitis.

摘要

目的

重症急性胰腺炎与较高的发病率/死亡率相关;因此,预测病程的能力至关重要。急性生理与慢性健康状况评估II(APACHE)的更新版本APACHE IV最近已得到验证。与其他版本不同,APACHE IV使用肝胆参数,并考虑了多种合并症和镇静情况。本研究旨在在前瞻性队列中检验APACHE IV对胰腺炎死亡率和次要结局的预测能力。此外,我们将APACHE IV与APACHE II、急性胰腺炎严重程度床边指数及兰森标准进行了比较。

方法

我们前瞻性收集了2011年8月至2014年4月期间266例重症急性胰腺炎患者每个评分系统的生理参数。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积确定每个评分的预后价值。

结果

266例患者中,59%为男性,52%为白人,36.5%患有酒精性胰腺炎。15例(5.6%)死亡,APACHE IV评分44分及以上对100%的病例可预测死亡。APACHE IV的受试者工作特征曲线为0.93(置信区间[CI],0.88 - 0.97);APACHE II为0.87(CI,0.80 - 0.94);急性胰腺炎严重程度床边指数为0.86(CI,0.78 - 0.94);兰森标准为0.90(CI,0.94 - 0.96)。

结论

APACHE IV是预测急性胰腺炎死亡率和疾病相关并发症的有效方法。

相似文献

1
The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV, a New Scoring System for Predicting Mortality and Complications of Severe Acute Pancreatitis.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估IV,一种预测重症急性胰腺炎死亡率和并发症的新评分系统。
Pancreas. 2015 Nov;44(8):1314-9. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000432.
2
Comparison of scoring systems in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis.预测急性胰腺炎严重程度的评分系统比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 28;21(8):2387-94. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2387.
3
Comparison of the BISAP scores for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis in Chinese patients according to the latest Atlanta classification.根据最新亚特兰大分类法比较BISAP评分对中国急性胰腺炎患者严重程度的预测价值
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Sep;21(9):689-694. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.118. Epub 2014 May 22.
4
Evaluation of the BISAP scoring system in prognostication of acute pancreatitis - A prospective observational study.BISAP 评分系统对急性胰腺炎预后评估的价值 - 一项前瞻性观察研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.026. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
5
[Value of four scoring systems for predicting prognosis of severe acute pancreatitis].[四种评分系统对预测重症急性胰腺炎预后的价值]
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2009 Jan;7(1):34-40. doi: 10.3736/jcim20090105.
6
[The comparison of different clinical scoring systems for predicting prognosis in acute pancreatitis based on the revised Atlanta classification].基于修订的亚特兰大分类法的不同临床评分系统对急性胰腺炎预后预测的比较
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Aug;52(8):668-71.
7
Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE II and III scoring systems in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome.巴尔萨泽计算机断层扫描严重程度指数在预测急性胰腺炎预后方面优于兰森标准、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II和III。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003 Mar;36(3):253-60. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200303000-00013.
8
APACHE system is better than Ranson system in the prediction of severity of acute pancreatitis.在预测急性胰腺炎的严重程度方面,急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE系统)比兰森标准(Ranson系统)更具优势。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2006 May;5(2):294-9.
9
Comparison and validation of scoring systems in a cohort of patients treated for biliary acute pancreatitis.胆道急性胰腺炎治疗患者队列中评分系统的比较与验证
Pancreas. 2007 Jan;34(1):66-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mpa.0000246667.53622.e3.
10
[The role of four criteria in assessment of the severity and prognosis of hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis].[四项标准在高脂血症性急性胰腺炎严重程度及预后评估中的作用]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 1;55(9):695-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2016.09.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a visual prediction model for severe acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study.重症急性胰腺炎视觉预测模型的开发与验证:一项回顾性研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 2;12:1564742. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1564742. eCollection 2025.
2
Integrating CT-based radiomics and clinical features to better predict the prognosis of acute pancreatitis.整合基于CT的影像组学和临床特征以更好地预测急性胰腺炎的预后。
Insights Imaging. 2025 Jan 9;16(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01887-2.
3
Clinical usefulness of scoring systems to predict severe acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis with pre and post-test probability assessment.
评分系统对预测重症急性胰腺炎的临床实用性:系统评价和荟萃分析,包括前后测试概率评估。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2023 Nov;11(9):825-836. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12464. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
4
The Role of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) in the Prognosis of Acute Pancreatitis.改良早期预警评分(MEWS)在急性胰腺炎预后中的作用
Oman Med J. 2021 May 31;36(3):e272. doi: 10.5001/omj.2021.72. eCollection 2021 May.
5
Family automated voice reorientation (FAVoR) intervention for mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.家庭自动化语音重定向(FAVoR)干预在重症监护病房机械通气患者中的应用:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Mar;102:106277. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106277. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
6
Early prediction of in-hospital mortality in acute pancreatitis: a retrospective observational cohort study based on a large multicentre critical care database.基于大型多中心重症监护数据库的急性胰腺炎院内死亡率的早期预测:回顾性观察性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 23;10(12):e041893. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041893.
7
Is It All Clear if Procalcitonin Clears in Acute Pancreatitis?在急性胰腺炎中,如果降钙素原清除了是否就一切都没问题了?
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;24(3):149-150. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23388.
8
Performance of physiology scoring systems in prediction of in-hospital mortality of traumatic children: A prospective observational study.生理学评分系统对创伤儿童院内死亡率的预测效能:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017 Nov;8(Suppl 2):S43-S48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
9
The Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis: a systematic review of prospective studies to determine predictive performance.急性胰腺炎严重程度床边指数:确定预测性能的前瞻性研究的系统评价
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2017 Sep 19;7(4):208-213. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2017.1361292. eCollection 2017 Oct.