Suppr超能文献

不明来源栓塞性卒中患者二级预防中比较口服凝血酶抑制剂达比加群酯与阿司匹林疗效及安全性的随机、双盲评估研究(RE-SPECT ESUS)设计

Design of Randomized, double-blind, Evaluation in secondary Stroke Prevention comparing the EfficaCy and safety of the oral Thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate vs. acetylsalicylic acid in patients with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (RE-SPECT ESUS).

作者信息

Diener Hans-Christoph, Easton J Donald, Granger Christopher B, Cronin Lisa, Duffy Christine, Cotton Daniel, Brueckmann Martina, Sacco Ralph L

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Department of Neurology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Stroke. 2015 Dec;10(8):1309-12. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12630. Epub 2015 Sep 30.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Cryptogenic ischemic strokes constitute 20-30% of ischemic strokes, the majority of which are embolic strokes of undetermined source. The standard preventive treatment in these patients is usually acetylsalicylic acid.

AIM

The Randomized, double-blind, Evaluation in secondary Stroke Prevention comparing the EfficaCy and safety of the oral Thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate vs. acetylsalicylic acid in patients with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (RE-SPECT ESUS) is designed to determine whether the oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, taken within three-months after embolic stroke of undetermined source, is superior to acetylsalicylic acid for prevention of recurrent stroke and to characterize the safety of dabigatran in this setting.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in approximately 6000 patients and 550 centers with embolic stroke of undetermined source. Subjects are randomized to dabigatran or acetylsalicylic acid and treated for an expected minimum of six-months and up to approximately three-years. It is an event-driven trial aiming for 353 adjudicated primary outcome events.

STUDY OUTCOMES

The primary efficacy outcome is time to first recurrent stroke (ischemic, hemorrhagic, or unspecified). Key secondary outcomes are time to first ischemic stroke and time to first occurrence in the composite outcome of nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death. The primary safety outcome is major hemorrhage, including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.

DISCUSSION

Acetylsalicylic acid is the most common antithrombotic given to patients with embolic strokes of undetermined source to reduce recurrence risk. This trial will determine whether anticoagulation with dabigatran is more effective than acetylsalicylic acid, and acceptably safe.

摘要

理论依据

隐源性缺血性卒中占缺血性卒中的20%-30%,其中大多数为来源不明的栓塞性卒中。这些患者的标准预防性治疗通常是阿司匹林。

目的

“不明来源栓塞性卒中患者二级预防中口服凝血酶抑制剂达比加群酯与阿司匹林疗效和安全性比较的随机、双盲评估”(RE-SPECT ESUS)研究旨在确定在不明来源栓塞性卒中后三个月内服用口服凝血酶抑制剂达比加群是否在预防复发性卒中方面优于阿司匹林,并明确达比加群在此情况下的安全性。

设计

在约6000例患者和550个中心进行的前瞻性、随机、双盲、多中心试验,纳入不明来源栓塞性卒中患者。受试者被随机分配至达比加群或阿司匹林组,治疗时间预计至少六个月,最长约三年。这是一项事件驱动的试验,目标是发生353例经判定的主要结局事件。

研究结局

主要疗效结局是首次复发性卒中(缺血性、出血性或未明确类型)的发生时间。关键次要结局是首次缺血性卒中的发生时间以及非致命性卒中、非致命性心肌梗死和心血管死亡这一复合结局中首次发生的时间。主要安全性结局是大出血,包括有症状的颅内出血。

讨论

阿司匹林是给予不明来源栓塞性卒中患者以降低复发风险最常用的抗栓药物。本试验将确定达比加群抗凝治疗是否比阿司匹林更有效且安全性可接受。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验