• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

RE-SPECT ESUS 试验中不明来源栓塞性卒中后复发卒中的预测因素。

Predictors of Recurrent Stroke After Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source in the RE-SPECT ESUS Trial.

机构信息

Department of Neurology University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami FL.

Department of Neurology University Duisburg-Essen Essen Germany.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 7;11(11):e023545. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023545. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.121.023545
PMID:35656979
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9238731/
Abstract

Background We sought to determine recurrent stroke predictors among patients with embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS). Methods and Results We applied Cox proportional hazards models to identify clinical features associated with recurrent stroke among participants enrolled in RE-SPECT ESUS (Randomized, Double-Blind, Evaluation in Secondary Stroke Prevention Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of the Oral Thrombin Inhibitor Dabigatran Etexilate Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid in Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source) trial, an international clinical trial evaluating dabigatran versus aspirin for patients with ESUS. During a median follow-up of 19 months, 384 of 5390 participants had recurrent stroke (annual rate, 4.5%). Multivariable models revealed that stroke or transient ischemic attack before the index event (hazard ratio [HR], 2.27 [95% CI, 1.83-2.82]), creatinine clearance <50 mL/min (HR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.23-2.32]), male sex (HR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.27-2.02]), and CHADS-VASc ≥4 (HR, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.15-2.08] and HR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.21-2.26] for scores of 4 and ≥5, respectively) versus CHADS-VASc of 2 to 3, were independent predictors for recurrent stroke. Conclusions In RE-SPECT ESUS trial, expected risk factors previously linked to other common stroke causes were associated with stroke recurrence. These data help define high-risk groups for subsequent stroke that may be useful for clinicians and for researchers designing trials among patients with ESUS. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02239120.

摘要

背景 我们旨在确定不明来源栓塞性卒中(ESUS)患者的复发性卒中预测因素。

方法和结果 我们应用 Cox 比例风险模型来确定参与 RE-SPECT ESUS 试验(一项评估达比加群酯与阿司匹林用于 ESUS 患者的随机、双盲、二次卒中预防评估中疗效和安全性的国际临床试验)的患者中与复发性卒中相关的临床特征。在中位随访 19 个月期间,5390 名参与者中有 384 名发生了复发性卒中(年发生率为 4.5%)。多变量模型显示,索引事件前的卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作(风险比[HR],2.27[95%CI,1.83-2.82])、肌酐清除率<50 mL/min(HR,1.69[95%CI,1.23-2.32])、男性(HR,1.60[95%CI,1.27-2.02])和 CHADS-VASc≥4(HR,1.55[95%CI,1.15-2.08]和 HR,1.66[95%CI,1.21-2.26],评分分别为 4 分和≥5 分)与 CHADS-VASc 为 2 至 3 分相比,是复发性卒中的独立预测因素。

结论 在 RE-SPECT ESUS 试验中,与其他常见卒中病因相关的预期危险因素与卒中复发相关。这些数据有助于为随后的卒中确定高风险人群,这对于临床医生和 ESUS 患者的研究人员设计试验可能有用。

注册网址

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT02239120。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42bd/9238731/d4b06c8f7ce8/JAH3-11-e023545-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42bd/9238731/d4b06c8f7ce8/JAH3-11-e023545-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42bd/9238731/d4b06c8f7ce8/JAH3-11-e023545-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictors of Recurrent Stroke After Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source in the RE-SPECT ESUS Trial.RE-SPECT ESUS 试验中不明来源栓塞性卒中后复发卒中的预测因素。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 7;11(11):e023545. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023545. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
2
Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation Development in Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: An Analysis of the RE-SPECT ESUS Trial.不明来源栓塞性卒中患者心房颤动发展的预测因素:RE-SPECT ESUS 试验分析。
Circulation. 2021 Nov 30;144(22):1738-1746. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055176. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
3
Antithrombotic Treatment of Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: RE-SPECT ESUS Elderly and Renally Impaired Subgroups.不明来源栓塞性卒中的抗栓治疗:RE-SPECT ESUS研究中的老年和肾功能损害亚组
Stroke. 2020 Jun;51(6):1758-1765. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028643. Epub 2020 May 14.
4
Design of Randomized, double-blind, Evaluation in secondary Stroke Prevention comparing the EfficaCy and safety of the oral Thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate vs. acetylsalicylic acid in patients with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (RE-SPECT ESUS).不明来源栓塞性卒中患者二级预防中比较口服凝血酶抑制剂达比加群酯与阿司匹林疗效及安全性的随机、双盲评估研究(RE-SPECT ESUS)设计
Int J Stroke. 2015 Dec;10(8):1309-12. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12630. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
5
Dabigatran or Aspirin in East Asian Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: RE-SPECT ESUS Subgroup Analysis.达比加群酯或阿司匹林用于东亚来源不明栓塞性脑卒中患者:RE-SPECT ESUS 亚组分析。
Stroke. 2021 Mar;52(3):1069-1073. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031891. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
6
Dabigatran vs. Aspirin for Secondary Prevention After Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source - Japanese Subanalysis of the RE-SPECT ESUS Randomized Controlled Trial.达比加群酯对比阿司匹林用于不明来源栓塞性卒中的二级预防-RE-SPECT ESUS 随机对照试验的日本亚组分析。
Circ J. 2020 Nov 25;84(12):2286-2295. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0563. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
7
Dabigatran or Aspirin After Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source in Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale: Results From RE-SPECT ESUS.卵圆孔未闭伴不明来源栓塞性卒中患者应用达比加群或阿司匹林治疗:RE-SPECT ESUS 研究结果。
Stroke. 2021 Mar;52(3):1065-1068. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031237. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
8
Predictors of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Embolic Strokes of Undetermined Source and Effects of Rivaroxaban Versus Aspirin According to Risk Status: The NAVIGATE ESUS Trial.不明来源栓塞性卒中患者复发性缺血性卒中的预测因素以及利伐沙班与阿司匹林根据风险状态的疗效比较:NAVIGATE ESUS试验
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Aug;28(8):2273-2279. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 May 31.
9
Dabigatran for Prevention of Stroke after Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.达比加群酯预防来源不明的栓塞性卒中后卒中
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 16;380(20):1906-1917. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1813959.
10
Characteristics of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke After Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.不明来源栓塞性卒中后复发缺血性卒中的特征:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Oct 1;77(10):1233-1240. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1995.

引用本文的文献

1
Proteomic Analyses of Clots Identify Stroke Etiologies in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Therapy.血凝块的蛋白质组学分析可识别接受血管内治疗患者的中风病因。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2025 Mar;31(3):e70340. doi: 10.1111/cns.70340.
2
2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.《2025年心脏病和中风统计数据:美国心脏协会关于美国和全球数据的报告》
Circulation. 2025 Feb 25;151(8):e41-e660. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001303. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
3
2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Long-term Continuous Cardiac Monitoring vs Usual Care on Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Stroke Attributed to Large- or Small-Vessel Disease: The STROKE-AF Randomized Clinical Trial.长期连续心脏监测与常规护理对大血管或小血管病变引起的卒中患者心房颤动检出率的影响:STROKE-AF 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jun 1;325(21):2169-2177. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6470.
2
Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source and Patent Foramen Ovale: Risk of Paradoxical Embolism Score Validation and Atrial Fibrillation Prediction.不明来源栓塞性脑卒中与卵圆孔未闭:矛盾栓塞风险评分验证与心房颤动预测。
Stroke. 2021 May;52(5):1643-1652. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032453. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
3
2024 年心脏病与中风统计数据:美国心脏协会发布的美国和全球数据报告。
Circulation. 2024 Feb 20;149(8):e347-e913. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001209. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
4
Arterial Hypertension and Its Consequences Are the Main Predictors of Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.动脉高血压及其后果是不明来源栓塞性脑卒中的主要预测因素。
Dis Markers. 2023 Nov 16;2023:3469755. doi: 10.1155/2023/3469755. eCollection 2023.
Epidemiology of Patent Foramen Ovale in General Population and in Stroke Patients: A Narrative Review.
普通人群和卒中患者卵圆孔未闭的流行病学:一项叙述性综述
Front Neurol. 2020 Apr 28;11:281. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00281. eCollection 2020.
4
A tool to identify patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source at high recurrence risk.一种用于识别栓塞性卒中来源不明且复发风险高的患者的工具。
Neurology. 2019 Dec 3;93(23):e2094-e2104. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008571. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
5
Predictors of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Embolic Strokes of Undetermined Source and Effects of Rivaroxaban Versus Aspirin According to Risk Status: The NAVIGATE ESUS Trial.不明来源栓塞性卒中患者复发性缺血性卒中的预测因素以及利伐沙班与阿司匹林根据风险状态的疗效比较:NAVIGATE ESUS试验
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Aug;28(8):2273-2279. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 May 31.
6
Incidence and Predictive Factors of Hidden Atrial Fibrillation Detected by Implantable Loop Recorder After an Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.不明来源栓塞性卒中后植入式循环记录仪检测到的隐匿性心房颤动的发生率及预测因素
J Atr Fibrillation. 2018 Oct 31;11(3):2078. doi: 10.4022/jafib.2078. eCollection 2018 Oct-Nov.
7
Dabigatran for Prevention of Stroke after Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.达比加群酯预防来源不明的栓塞性卒中后卒中
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 16;380(20):1906-1917. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1813959.
8
Large aortic arch plaques correlate with CHADS and CHADS-VASc scores in cryptogenic stroke.大动脉弓斑块与隐匿性卒中的 CHADS 和 CHADS-VASc 评分相关。
Atherosclerosis. 2019 May;284:181-186. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
9
Renal Function and Risk Stratification of Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.不明来源栓塞性脑卒中患者的肾功能与危险分层。
Stroke. 2018 Dec;49(12):2904-2909. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023281.
10
Relation of the CHADS-VASc Score to Risk of Thrombotic and Embolic Stroke in Community-Dwelling Individuals Without Atrial Fibrillation (From The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities [ARIC] Study).社区居住的非房颤个体中 CHADS-VASc 评分与血栓栓塞性脑卒中风险的关系(来自动脉粥样硬化风险社区研究 [ARIC])。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Feb 1;123(3):402-408. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.10.037. Epub 2018 Nov 6.