• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲霜灵/铜(II)与甲霜灵/锌(II)在HepG2细胞中协同毒性的不同模式:凋亡与坏死

Different modes of synergistic toxicities between metam/copper (II) and metam/zinc (II) in HepG2 cells: apoptosis vs. necrosis.

作者信息

Fan Rui-Mei, Zhu Ben-Zhan, Huang Chin-Pao, Sheng Zhi-Guo, Mao Li, Li Ming-Xin

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China.

Environmental Engineering, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of Delaware, USA.

出版信息

Environ Toxicol. 2016 Dec;31(12):1964-1973. doi: 10.1002/tox.22197. Epub 2015 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1002/tox.22197
PMID:26420683
Abstract

Both metam sodium and copper/zinc-containing compounds are widely used as fungicides. They therefore may co-occur in the biosphere. Despite certain studies of individual toxicity for either metam or copper (II)/zinc (II), their synergistic toxicity has not been examined. In this paper, a remarkable synergistic toxicity was observed in HepG2 cells when metam and copper (II)/zinc (II) at non-toxic and sub-toxic levels were combined. Unexpectedly, cell death modes between metam/copper (II) and metam/zinc (II) were different: For metam/copper (II), apoptosis was evident from morphological characteristics including cytoplasm-chromatin condensation, phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure, SubG /G DNA fragmentation, mitochondrial membrane potential decrease, pro/anti-apoptotic protein activation, and cytochrome c release; for metam/zinc (II), necrosis was evident from organelle swelling and uncontrolled collapse. To our knowledge, this work first not only demonstrates the synergistic toxicities of metam and both copper (II)/zinc (II), but also verifies the different modes of apoptosis/necrosis between metam/copper (II) and metam/zinc (II). © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Environ Toxicol 31: 1964-1973, 2016.

摘要

甲拌磷和含铜/锌的化合物都被广泛用作杀菌剂。因此,它们可能会在生物圈中同时出现。尽管已经对甲拌磷或铜(II)/锌(II)的单独毒性进行了某些研究,但它们的协同毒性尚未得到研究。在本文中,当无毒和亚毒性水平的甲拌磷与铜(II)/锌(II)组合时,在HepG2细胞中观察到了显著的协同毒性。出乎意料的是,甲拌磷/铜(II)和甲拌磷/锌(II)之间的细胞死亡模式不同:对于甲拌磷/铜(II),从包括细胞质-染色质浓缩、磷脂酰丝氨酸(PS)暴露、亚G1/G0 DNA片段化、线粒体膜电位降低、促凋亡/抗凋亡蛋白激活和细胞色素c释放等形态学特征可以明显看出凋亡;对于甲拌磷/锌(II),从细胞器肿胀和不受控制的崩溃可以明显看出坏死。据我们所知,这项工作不仅首次证明了甲拌磷与铜(II)/锌(II)的协同毒性,还验证了甲拌磷/铜(II)和甲拌磷/锌(II)之间凋亡/坏死的不同模式。© 2015威利期刊公司。《环境毒理学》31: 1964 - 1973, 2016。

相似文献

1
Different modes of synergistic toxicities between metam/copper (II) and metam/zinc (II) in HepG2 cells: apoptosis vs. necrosis.甲霜灵/铜(II)与甲霜灵/锌(II)在HepG2细胞中协同毒性的不同模式:凋亡与坏死
Environ Toxicol. 2016 Dec;31(12):1964-1973. doi: 10.1002/tox.22197. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
2
Mechanistic investigation of the differential synergistic neurotoxicity between pesticide metam sodium and copper or zinc.农药甲拌磷与铜锌协同神经毒性的机制研究。
Chemosphere. 2023 Jul;328:138430. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138430. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
3
Toxicology of metam sodium.威百亩的毒理学
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2001 Apr-Jun;4(2):207-22. doi: 10.1080/10937400117071.
4
Pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate-zinc(II) and -copper(II) complexes induce apoptosis in tumor cells by inhibiting the proteasomal activity.吡咯烷二硫代氨基甲酸盐 - 锌(II)和 - 铜(II)配合物通过抑制蛋白酶体活性诱导肿瘤细胞凋亡。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2008 Aug 15;231(1):24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2008.03.009. Epub 2008 Mar 28.
5
Studies on synergistic toxic effects of copper and dithiocarbamate pesticides with the ciliate protozoan Colpidium campylum (Stokes).铜与二硫代氨基甲酸盐类农药对纤毛原生动物坎氏结肠肠袋虫(斯托克斯)的协同毒性作用研究
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1990 Jun;19(3):320-6. doi: 10.1016/0147-6513(90)90034-3.
6
Evaluation of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ether Toxicity on HepG2 Cells - Hexabrominated Congener (BDE-154) Is Less Toxic than Tetrabrominated Congener (BDE-47).多溴二苯醚对HepG2细胞毒性的评估——六溴同系物(BDE-154)的毒性低于四溴同系物(BDE-47)。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2016 Nov;119(5):485-497. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12598. Epub 2016 Jun 12.
7
Mechanisms of mitochondrial toxicity of the kinase inhibitors ponatinib, regorafenib and sorafenib in human hepatic HepG2 cells.激酶抑制剂帕纳替尼、瑞戈非尼和索拉非尼在人肝 HepG2 细胞中线粒体毒性的机制。
Toxicology. 2018 Feb 15;395:34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
8
[Relationship between blue light-induced apoptosis and mitochondrial membrane potential and cytochrome C in cultured human retinal pigment epithelium cells].[蓝光诱导的人视网膜色素上皮细胞凋亡与线粒体膜电位及细胞色素C的关系]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Dec;42(12):1095-102.
9
Changes in the expression of epigenetic factors during copper-induced apoptosis in PC12 cells.PC12细胞中铜诱导凋亡过程中表观遗传因子表达的变化。
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2014;49(9):1023-8. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2014.894847.
10
Lethal synergism between organic and inorganic wood preservatives via formation of an unusual lipophilic ternary complex.有机和无机木材防腐剂通过形成不寻常的亲脂性三元配合物而产生致命协同作用。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2013 Feb 1;266(3):335-44. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2012.11.013. Epub 2012 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Biological Applications, In Vitro Cytotoxicity, Cellular Uptake, and Apoptotic Pathway Studies Induced by Ternary Cu (II) Complexes Involving Triflupromazine with Biorelevant Ligands.涉及与生物相关配体的三氟丙嗪的三元 Cu(II)配合物的生物学应用、体外细胞毒性、细胞摄取和凋亡途径研究。
Cell Biochem Biophys. 2024 Sep;82(3):2651-2671. doi: 10.1007/s12013-024-01376-9. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
2
Targeted live-cell nuclear delivery of the DNA 'light-switching' Ru(II) complex via ion-pairing with chlorophenolate counter-anions: the critical role of binding stability and lipophilicity of the ion-pairing complexes.通过与氯酚盐抗衡阴离子的离子配对,靶向活细胞细胞核内传递 DNA“光开关”Ru(II)配合物:离子配对配合物的结合稳定性和亲脂性的关键作用。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Nov 18;47(20):10520-10528. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz152.
3
Effect of a Copper (II) Complex on The Induction of Apoptosis in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells.铜(II)配合物对人肝癌细胞凋亡诱导的影响
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Oct 26;19(10):2877-2884. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.10.2877.