Son Sang-Yong, Yi Nam-Joon, Hong Geun, Kim Hyeyoung, Park Min Su, Choi Young Rok, Suh Kyung-Suk, Kim Duck-Woo, Jeong Seung-Yong, Park Kyu-Joo, Park Jae-Gahb, Lee Kuhn-Uk
Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2011 Nov;15(4):206-17. doi: 10.14701/kjhbps.2011.15.4.206. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Hepatic resection has only guaranteed long-term survival in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) even in the era of effective chemotherapy. The definite role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is to improve outcomes of unresectable CRLMs, but it its role has not been defined for initially resectable CRLMs (IR-CRLMs).
We reviewed the medical records of 226 patients, who had been diagnosed and treated for IR-CRLM between 2003 and 2008; the patients had the following pathologies: 10% had more than 4 nodules, 11% had tumors larger than 5 cm, and 61% had synchronous CRMLs. Among these patients, 20 patients (Group Y) were treated with NCT, and 206 (Group N) did not receive NCT according to their physician's preference. The median follow-up time was 34.1 months.
The initial surgical plans were changed after NCT to further resection in 20% and to limited resection in 10% of 20 patients. Complication rates of Groups Y (30%) were indifferent from Group N (23%) (p=0.233), but intraoperative transfusions were more frequent in Group N (15%) than in Group Y (5%) (p=0.006). There was one case of hospital mortality (0.44%). Disease-free survival rates in Groups Y and N were 23% and 39%, respectively, and patient survival rates were 42% and 66% (p>0.05). By multivariate analysis, old age (≥60 years), differentiation of primary tumor (poorly/mucinous), resection margin involvement, and no adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with poor patient survival; the number of CRLMs (≥4) was associated with poor disease-free survival.
NCT had neither a positive impact nor a negative impact on survival, even with intraoperative transfusion, as observed on operative outcomes for patients with IR-CRLM. Further study is required to elucidate the role of NCT for treatment of patient with IR-CRLMs.
背景/目的:即使在有效化疗时代,肝切除术仍是结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)患者获得长期生存的唯一保障。新辅助化疗(NCT)的明确作用是改善不可切除CRLM患者的预后,但其对初始可切除CRLM(IR-CRLM)患者的作用尚未明确。
我们回顾了2003年至2008年间226例被诊断并接受IR-CRLM治疗患者的病历;这些患者有以下病理情况:10%有4个以上结节,11%肿瘤大于5cm,61%为同时性CRMLs。在这些患者中,20例(Y组)接受了NCT治疗,206例(N组)根据医生的偏好未接受NCT治疗。中位随访时间为34.1个月。
NCT后,20例患者中有20%的初始手术计划改为进一步切除,10%改为有限切除。Y组(30%)的并发症发生率与N组(23%)无差异(p=0.233),但N组(15%)术中输血比Y组(5%)更频繁(p=0.006)。有1例医院死亡(0.44%)。Y组和N组的无病生存率分别为23%和39%,患者生存率分别为42%和66%(p>0.05)。多因素分析显示,老年(≥60岁)、原发肿瘤分化(差/黏液性)、切缘受累及未接受辅助化疗与患者生存不良相关;CRLM数量(≥4个)与无病生存不良相关。
对于IR-CRLM患者的手术结局,NCT对生存既无积极影响也无消极影响,即使存在术中输血情况。需要进一步研究以阐明NCT在IR-CRLM患者治疗中的作用。