Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 2011 Apr;21(4):832-40. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1977-2. Epub 2010 Oct 2.
To compare diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the detection and characterisation of focal liver lesions (FLLs) in patients with colorectal carcinoma.
Seventy-three patients underwent MR imaging including echoplanar DWI (MR-DWI) and dynamic (MR-Dyn) and hepatobiliary phase (MR-Late) Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced images. Two blinded readers independently reviewed 5 different image sets using a 5-point confidence scale. Accuracy was assessed by the area (A(z)) under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated.
A total of 332 FLLs were evaluated. Detection rates were significantly higher for MR-Late images (94.4% for benign and 100% for malignant lesions) compared with MR-DWI (78.3% and 97.5%) and MR-Dyn images (81.5% and 89.9%). Accuracy was 0.82, 0.76 and 0.89 for MR-DWI, MR-Dyn and MR-Late images while sensitivity was 0.98, 0.87 and 0.95, respectively. For characterisation of subcentimetre lesions sensitivity was highest for MR-DWI (0.92). Combined reading of unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images had an identical high accuracy of 0.98.
Late-phase Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced images were superior for the detection of FLLs, while DWIs were most valuable for the identification of particularly small metastases. Combined interpretation of unenhanced images resulted in precise characterisation of FLLs.
比较扩散加权成像(DWI)和钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振(MR)成像在结直肠癌患者局灶性肝脏病变(FLL)的检出和特征分析中的作用。
73 例患者接受了包括磁共振弥散加权成像(MR-DWI)和动态(MR-Dyn)及肝胆期(MR-Late)钆塞酸二钠增强图像的 MR 检查。两位盲法读者使用 5 分置信度量表独立分析了 5 种不同的图像集。通过受试者工作特征曲线下的面积(A(z))评估准确性,并计算敏感性和特异性。
共评估了 332 个 FLL。与 MR-DWI(良性病变为 78.3%,恶性病变为 97.5%)和 MR-Dyn 图像(良性病变为 81.5%,恶性病变为 89.9%)相比,MR-Late 图像的检出率明显更高(良性病变为 94.4%,恶性病变为 100%)。MR-DWI、MR-Dyn 和 MR-Late 图像的准确性分别为 0.82、0.76 和 0.89,敏感性分别为 0.98、0.87 和 0.95。对于亚厘米病变的特征分析,MR-DWI 的敏感性最高(0.92)。未增强和增强图像联合阅读的准确性也高达 0.98。
晚期 Gd-EOB-DTPA 增强图像在 FLL 的检出方面更具优势,而 DWI 则对识别特别小的转移灶最有价值。未增强图像的联合解读可精确地对 FLL 进行特征分析。