• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症相关急性肺损伤患者入住重症监护病房时的APACHE III预后预测

APACHE III Outcome Prediction in Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit with Sepsis Associated Acute Lung Injury.

作者信息

Zhang Zhongheng, Chen Kun, Chen Lin

机构信息

Department of critical care medicine, Jinhua municipal central hospital, Jinhua hospital of Zhejiang university, Zhejiang, P. R. China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Sep 30;10(9):e0139374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139374. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0139374
PMID:26422633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4589281/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III score has been widely used for prediction of clinical outcomes in mixed critically ill patients. However, it has not been validated in patients with sepsis-associated acute lung injury (ALI). The aim of the study was to explore the calibration and predictive value of APACHE III in patients with sepsis-associated ALI.

METHOD

The study was a secondary analysis of a prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of rosuvastatin in sepsis-associated ALI (Statins for Acutely Injured Lungs from Sepsis, SAILS). The study population was sepsis-related ALI patients. The primary outcome of the current study was the same as in the original trial, 60-day in-hospital mortality, defined as death before hospital discharge, censored 60 days after enrollment. Discrimination of APACHE III was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) with its 95% CI. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic was used to assess the calibration of APACHE III. The Brier score was reported to represent the overall performance of APACHE III in predicting outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 745 patients were included in the study, including 540 survivors and 205 non-survivors. Non-survivors were significantly older than survivors (59.71 ± 16.17 vs 52.00 ± 15.92 years, p < 0.001). The primary causes of ALI were also different between survivors and non-survivors (p = 0.017). Survivors were more likely to have the cause of sepsis than non-survivors (21.2% vs. 15.1%). APACHE III score was higher in non-survivors than in survivors (106.72 ± 27.30 vs. 88.42 ± 26.86; p < 0.001). Discrimination of APACHE III to predict mortality in ALI patients was moderate with an AUC of 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.73).

CONCLUSION

this study for the first time validated the discrimination of APACHE III in sepsis associated ALI patients. The result shows that APACHE III score has moderate predictive value for in-hospital mortality among adults with sepsis-associated acute lung injury.

摘要

背景与目的

急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)Ⅲ评分已广泛用于预测危重症混合患者的临床结局。然而,其在脓毒症相关急性肺损伤(ALI)患者中尚未得到验证。本研究的目的是探讨APACHEⅢ在脓毒症相关ALI患者中的校准情况及预测价值。

方法

本研究是一项前瞻性随机对照试验的二次分析,该试验旨在研究瑞舒伐他汀对脓毒症相关ALI的疗效(脓毒症所致急性肺损伤的他汀类药物治疗,SAILS)。研究人群为脓毒症相关ALI患者。本研究的主要结局与原试验相同,即60天院内死亡率,定义为出院前死亡,入组60天后进行截尾。通过计算受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)及其95%置信区间来评估APACHEⅢ的辨别力。采用Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度统计量来评估APACHEⅢ的校准情况。报告Brier评分以代表APACHEⅢ在预测结局方面的总体表现。

主要结果

本研究共纳入745例患者,其中540例存活,205例未存活。未存活者的年龄显著高于存活者(59.71±16.17岁 vs 52.00±15.92岁;p<0.001)。存活者和未存活者ALI的主要病因也有所不同(p = 0.017)。存活者因脓毒症导致ALI的可能性高于未存活者(21.2%对15.1%)。未存活者的APACHEⅢ评分高于存活者(106.72±27.30对88.42±26.86;p<0.001)。APACHEⅢ预测ALI患者死亡率的辨别力中等,AUC为0.68(95%置信区间:0.64 - 0.73)。

结论

本研究首次验证了APACHEⅢ在脓毒症相关ALI患者中的辨别力。结果表明,APACHEⅢ评分对脓毒症相关急性肺损伤成人患者的院内死亡率具有中等预测价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acd9/4589281/d0b2517acee0/pone.0139374.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acd9/4589281/2c2a9b556003/pone.0139374.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acd9/4589281/d0b2517acee0/pone.0139374.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acd9/4589281/2c2a9b556003/pone.0139374.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acd9/4589281/d0b2517acee0/pone.0139374.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
APACHE III Outcome Prediction in Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit with Sepsis Associated Acute Lung Injury.脓毒症相关急性肺损伤患者入住重症监护病房时的APACHE III预后预测
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 30;10(9):e0139374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139374. eCollection 2015.
2
The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation III outcome prediction in patients admitted to the intensive care unit after pneumonectomy.肺切除术后入住重症监护病房患者的急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估III结局预测
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007 Dec;21(6):832-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2006.12.005. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
3
Performance evaluation of APACHE II score for an Indian patient with respiratory problems.用于评估印度呼吸疾病患者的急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)的性能评价
Indian J Med Res. 2004 Jun;119(6):273-82.
4
Validation of the Sepsis Severity Score Compared with Updated Severity Scores in Predicting Hospital Mortality in Sepsis Patients.脓毒症严重程度评分与更新后的严重程度评分在预测脓毒症患者医院死亡率方面的验证
Shock. 2017 Jun;47(6):720-725. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000818.
5
Intensive care unit support and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III performance in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.重症监护病房支持与造血干细胞移植受者的急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估III表现
Crit Care Med. 2003 Jun;31(6):1715-21. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000065761.51367.2D.
6
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III outcome prediction after major vascular surgery.大血管手术后急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)III预后预测
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008 Oct;22(5):713-8. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2008.01.009. Epub 2008 Mar 28.
7
[Predictive value of SOFA score combined AGI grading system in elderly patients with sepsis: a retrospective analysis with 91 patients].序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分联合急性胃肠损伤(AGI)分级系统对老年脓毒症患者的预测价值:一项纳入91例患者的回顾性分析
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Feb;29(2):145-149. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.02.010.
8
Prediction of outcome from intensive care: a prospective cohort study comparing Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and III prognostic systems in a United Kingdom intensive care unit.重症监护结局的预测:一项前瞻性队列研究,比较英国一家重症监护病房中急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估II和III预后系统。
Crit Care Med. 1997 Jan;25(1):9-15. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199701000-00006.
9
Comparison of predictive accuracy among six prognosis prediction systems for patient mortality in intensive care units.六种重症监护病房患者死亡率预后预测系统的预测准确性比较。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2002 Jun;101(6):406-15.
10
Comparison of hospital mortality and long-term survival in patients with acute lung injury/ARDS vs cardiogenic pulmonary edema.急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者与心源性肺水肿患者的医院死亡率及长期生存率比较。
Chest. 2015 Mar;147(3):618-625. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-1371.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Performance of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III, and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II Scores in Patients with Suspected Infection According to Intensive Care Unit Type.根据重症监护病房类型,序贯器官衰竭评估、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分III及简化急性生理评分II在疑似感染患者中的预后评估表现
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 8;12(19):6402. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196402.
2
Predictive models for short-term mortality and length of hospital stay among adults with community-onset bacteraemia before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: application of early data dynamics.预测模型用于评估 COVID-19 大流行前后成人社区获得性菌血症短期死亡率和住院时间:早期数据动态的应用。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Sep 15;23(1):605. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08547-8.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction model for critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征重症患者的预测模型
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 30;10(3):e0120641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120641. eCollection 2015.
2
Heterogeneous postsurgical data analytics for predictive modeling of mortality risks in intensive care units.用于重症监护病房死亡风险预测建模的异质术后数据分析
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:4310-4. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944578.
3
A comparison of APACHE II and CPIS scores for the prediction of 30-day mortality in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Analysis of the correlation between the longitudinal trajectory of SOFA scores and prognosis in patients with sepsis at 72 hour after admission based on group trajectory modeling.基于群体轨迹模型分析脓毒症患者入院72小时后序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的纵向轨迹与预后的相关性。
J Intensive Med. 2021 Dec 21;2(1):39-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2021.11.001. eCollection 2022 Jan.
4
A Novel Composite Indicator of Predicting Mortality Risk for Heart Failure Patients With Diabetes Admitted to Intensive Care Unit Based on Machine Learning.基于机器学习的 ICU 收治糖尿病心力衰竭患者死亡风险预测的新型综合指标。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 29;13:917838. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.917838. eCollection 2022.
5
Mechanical power normalized to predicted body weight is associated with mortality in critically ill patients: a cohort study.机械功率与预测体重的比值与危重症患者的死亡率相关:一项队列研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Nov 10;21(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01497-1.
6
Sentiment Analysis for Necessary Preview of 30-Day Mortality in Sepsis Patients and the Control Strategies.脓毒症患者 30 天死亡率的必要预测的情感分析及控制策略。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Oct 25;2021:1713363. doi: 10.1155/2021/1713363. eCollection 2021.
7
Validation of APACHE II, APACHE III and SAPS II scores in in-hospital and one year mortality prediction in a mixed intensive care unit in Poland: a cohort study.验证 APACHE II、APACHE III 和 SAPS II 评分在波兰混合重症监护病房住院和一年死亡率预测中的应用:一项队列研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Dec 2;20(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01203-7.
8
The IL1β-HER2-CLDN18/CLDN4 axis mediates lung barrier damage in ARDS.IL1β-HER2-CLDN18/CLDN4 轴介导 ARDS 中的肺屏障损伤。
Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Feb 15;12(4):3249-3265. doi: 10.18632/aging.102804.
9
Assessing Intensity of Nursing Care Needs Using Electronically Available Data.利用电子可得数据评估护理需求强度
Comput Inform Nurs. 2017 Dec;35(12):617-623. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000375.
比较急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)和临床肺部感染评分(CPIS)对呼吸机相关性肺炎患者30天死亡率的预测价值。
Int J Infect Dis. 2015 Jan;30:144-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
4
External validation of the A2DS2 score to predict stroke-associated pneumonia in a Chinese population: a prospective cohort study.A2DS2评分在中国人群中预测卒中相关性肺炎的外部验证:一项前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 9;9(10):e109665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109665. eCollection 2014.
5
Arterial lactate improves the prognostic performance of severity score systems in septic patients in the ED.动脉血乳酸水平可改善急诊科脓毒症患者严重程度评分系统的预后评估效能。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;32(9):982-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.05.025. Epub 2014 May 24.
6
Comparison of Charlson's weighted index of comorbidities with the chronic health score for the prediction of mortality in septic patients.比较查尔森共病加权指数与慢性健康评分对脓毒症患者死亡率的预测能力。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(14):2623-7.
7
Rosuvastatin for sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome.瑞舒伐他汀用于脓毒症相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 5;370(23):2191-200. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1401520. Epub 2014 May 18.
8
Mortality risk score for Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia.肺炎克雷伯菌血症的死亡风险评分
Eur J Intern Med. 2014 Jul;25(6):571-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 May 9.
9
Comparison of APACHE III, APACHE IV, SAPS 3, and MPM0III and influence of resuscitation status on model performance.比较 APACHE III、APACHE IV、SAPS 3 和 MPM0III 以及复苏状态对模型性能的影响。
Chest. 2012 Oct;142(4):851-858. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2164.
10
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with acute lung injury and ARDS.急性肺损伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的临床特征及预后
J Postgrad Med. 2011 Oct-Dec;57(4):286-90. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.90077.