Geist-Martin Patricia, Bollinger Beth J, Wiechert Kelsey N, Plump Brielle, Sharf Barbara F
a School of Communication , San Diego State University.
b School of Communication , University of Washington.
Health Commun. 2016;31(5):544-56. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.976605. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
A shift has occurred in the provision of health care to include a focus not just on biology and disease but also on the whole person, preventative care, and an array of healing modalities based on systems of beliefs and values not typically included within biomedical practice. This approach to health care, termed integrative medicine (IM), blends biomedicine with a broader understanding of patients and their illnesses, including elements of mind, body, and spirit that may be contributing to an ailment. While the use of integrative medicine has increased and centers for integrative medicine have proliferated within conventional health care organizations, distinct tensions arise from this amalgamation. The tensions between IM and biomedical clinicians often center on their differing training and philosophies, as well as on a larger system of health care that privileges biomedicine. As a result, this research is designed to explore the challenges IM clinicians face in collaborating with conventional practitioners to provide patient care. Analysis of interviews with 14 clinicians at one center for integrative medicine revealed four specific challenges they face in their attempt to co-practice IM with conventional medicine. The four challenges include (a) challenges to collaboration, (b) challenges to legitimacy, (c) challenges to consistency, and (d) challenges to unification. Future research should investigate the ways in which these challenges can be addressed so that collaboration throughout the system is facilitated. The professional training of clinicians, the structuring and institutionalization of integrative medicine, and enhanced systems for communicating patient information all play a significant role in this transformation.
医疗保健的提供方式已经发生了转变,不仅关注生物学和疾病,还关注整个人、预防保健以及一系列基于通常不包含在生物医学实践中的信仰和价值体系的治疗方式。这种医疗保健方法被称为整合医学(IM),它将生物医学与对患者及其疾病的更广泛理解相结合,包括可能导致疾病的身心和精神因素。虽然整合医学的使用有所增加,并且整合医学中心在传统医疗保健机构中大量涌现,但这种融合产生了明显的矛盾。整合医学临床医生与生物医学临床医生之间的矛盾往往集中在他们不同的培训和理念上,以及更倾向于生物医学的更大的医疗保健体系上。因此,本研究旨在探讨整合医学临床医生在与传统从业者合作提供患者护理时所面临的挑战。对一家整合医学中心的14名临床医生的访谈分析揭示了他们在尝试与传统医学共同实践整合医学时所面临的四个具体挑战。这四个挑战包括:(a)合作方面的挑战,(b)合法性方面的挑战,(c)一致性方面的挑战,以及(d)统一方面的挑战。未来的研究应该调查如何应对这些挑战,以便促进整个系统的合作。临床医生的专业培训、整合医学的构建和制度化以及加强患者信息沟通系统在这一转变中都发挥着重要作用。