Hsiao An-Fu, Hays Ron D, Ryan Gery W, Coulter Ian D, Andersen Ronald M, Hardy Mary L, Diehl David L, Hui Ka-Kit, Wenger Neil S
UCLA Department of Medicine, Division of GIM/HSR, 911 Broxton Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1736, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2005 Oct;40(5 Pt 1):1553-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00425.x.
Patients in the U.S. often turn to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and may use it concurrently with conventional medicine to treat illness and promote wellness. However, clinicians vary in their openness to the merging of treatment paradigms. Because integration of CAM with conventional medicine can have important implications for health care, we developed a survey instrument to assess clinicians' orientation toward integrative medicine.
A convenience sample of 294 acupuncturists, chiropractors, primary care physicians, and physician acupuncturists in academic and community settings in California.
We used a qualitative analysis of structured interviews to develop a conceptual model of integrative medicine at the provider level. Based on this conceptual model, we developed a 30-item survey (IM-30) to assess five domains of clinicians' orientation toward integrative medicine: openness, readiness to refer, learning from alternate paradigms, patient-centered care, and safety of integration.
Two hundred and two clinicians (69 percent response rate) returned the survey. The internal consistency reliability for the 30-item total scale and the five subscales ranged from 0.71 to 0.90. Item-scale correlations for the five subscales were higher for the hypothesized subscale than other subscales 75 percent or more of the time. Construct validity was supported by the association of the IM-30 total scale score (0-100 possible range, with a higher score indicative of greater orientation toward integrative medicine) with hypothesized constructs: physician acupuncturists scored higher than physicians (71 versus 50, p<.001), dual-trained practitioners scored higher than single-trained practitioners (71 versus 62, p<.001), and practitioners' self-perceived "integrativeness" was significantly correlated (r=0.60, p<.001) with the IM-30 total score.
This study provides support for the reliability and validity of the IM-30 as a measure of clinicians' orientation toward integrative medicine. The IM-30 survey, which we estimate as requiring 5 minutes to complete, can be administered to both conventional and CAM clinicians.
美国患者常常求助于补充替代医学(CAM),并可能将其与传统医学同时使用来治疗疾病和促进健康。然而,临床医生对于治疗模式融合的接受程度各不相同。由于补充替代医学与传统医学的整合对医疗保健可能具有重要意义,我们开发了一种调查工具来评估临床医生对整合医学的倾向。
对加利福尼亚州学术和社区环境中的294名针灸师、脊椎按摩师、初级保健医生以及医师针灸师进行便利抽样。
我们通过对结构化访谈进行定性分析,构建了提供者层面整合医学的概念模型。基于此概念模型,我们开发了一份包含30个条目的调查问卷(IM-30),以评估临床医生对整合医学倾向的五个领域:开放性、转介意愿、从其他模式学习、以患者为中心的护理以及整合的安全性。
202名临床医生(回复率69%)返回了调查问卷。30个条目总量表及五个子量表的内部一致性信度在0.71至0.9之间。五个子量表的条目与量表的相关性中,75%或更多时候,假设子量表的相关性高于其他子量表。IM-30总量表得分(可能范围为0至100,得分越高表明对整合医学的倾向越大)与假设结构之间的关联支持了结构效度:医师针灸师得分高于医生(71对50,p<0.001),接受双重培训的从业者得分高于单一培训的从业者(71对6,2,p<0.001),从业者自我感知的“整合性”与IM-30总分显著相关(r = 0.60,p<0.001)。
本研究为IM-30作为衡量临床医生对整合医学倾向的可靠性和有效性提供了支持。我们估计完成IM-30调查问卷需要5分钟,它可用于传统医学和补充替代医学的临床医生。