Bastianpillai Christopher, Petrides Neophytos, Shah Taimur, Guillaumier Stephanie, Ahmed Hashim U, Arya Manit
Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Princess Alexandra Hospital, Hamstel Road, Harlow, CM20 1QX, UK.
Tumour Biol. 2015 Dec;36(12):9137-46. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4126-3. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
Minimally invasive interventional therapies are evolving rapidly and their use for the treatment of solid tumours is becoming more extensive. The in situ destruction of solid tumours by such therapies is thought to release antigens that can prime an antitumour immune response. In this review, we offer an overview of the current evidence for immune response activation associated with the utilisation of the main thermal and non-thermal ablation therapies currently in use today. This is followed by an assessment of the hypothesised mechanisms behind this immune response priming and by a discussion of potential methods of harnessing this specific response, which may subsequently be applicable in the treatment of cancer patients. References were identified through searches of PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane databases to identify peer-reviewed original articles, meta-analyses and reviews. Papers were searched from 1850 until October 2014. Articles were also identified through searches of the authors' files. Only papers published in English were reviewed. Thermal and non-thermal therapies have the potential to stimulate antitumour immunity although the current body of evidence is based mostly on murine trials or small-scale phase 1 human trials. The evidence for this immune-modulatory response is currently the strongest in relation to cryotherapy and radiotherapy, although data is accumulating for related ablative treatments such as high-intensity focused ultrasound, radiofrequency ablation and irreversible electroporation. This effect may be greatly enhanced by combining these therapies with other immunostimulatory interventions. Evidence is emerging into the immunomodulatory effect associated with thermal and non-thermal ablative therapies used in cancer treatment in addition to the mechanism behind this effect and how it may be harnessed for therapeutic use. A potential exists for treatment approaches that combine ablation of the primary tumour with control and possible eradication of persistent, locally recurrent and metastatic disease. However, more work is needed into each of these modalities, initially in further animal studies and then subsequently in large-scale prospective human studies.
微创介入治疗正在迅速发展,其在实体肿瘤治疗中的应用也越来越广泛。人们认为,通过此类治疗原位破坏实体肿瘤会释放抗原,从而引发抗肿瘤免疫反应。在本综述中,我们概述了目前与当前正在使用的主要热消融和非热消融治疗相关的免疫反应激活证据。随后评估了这种免疫反应引发背后的假设机制,并讨论了利用这种特异性反应的潜在方法,这些方法随后可能适用于癌症患者的治疗。通过检索PubMed/MEDLINE和Cochrane数据库来确定参考文献,以识别同行评审的原始文章、荟萃分析和综述。检索了从1850年到2014年10月的论文。还通过检索作者的文件来识别文章。仅对英文发表的论文进行了综述。热疗和非热疗有刺激抗肿瘤免疫的潜力,尽管目前的证据大多基于小鼠试验或小规模的1期人体试验。目前,关于这种免疫调节反应的证据在冷冻疗法和放射疗法方面最为有力,尽管关于高强度聚焦超声、射频消融和不可逆电穿孔等相关消融治疗的数据也在不断积累。将这些疗法与其他免疫刺激干预措施相结合,可能会大大增强这种效果。除了这种效应背后的机制以及如何将其用于治疗用途外,与癌症治疗中使用的热消融和非热消融疗法相关的免疫调节效应的证据也在不断涌现。将原发性肿瘤的消融与控制并可能根除持续性、局部复发性和转移性疾病的治疗方法存在潜力。然而,对于这些治疗方式中的每一种都需要开展更多工作,首先是在进一步的动物研究中,然后是在大规模的前瞻性人体研究中。