Guha Daipayan, Heary Robert F, Shamji Mohammed F
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto;
Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Oct;39(4):E9. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15259.
OBJECT Decompression without fusion for degenerative lumbar stenosis is an effective treatment for both the pain and disability of neurogenic claudication. Iatrogenic instability following decompression may require further intervention to stabilize the spine. The authors review the incidence of postsurgical instability following lumbar decompression, and assess the impact of surgical technique as well as study design on the incidence of instability. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify surgical cohorts of patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis, with and without preexisting spondylolisthesis, who were treated with laminectomy or minimally invasive decompression without fusion. Data on patient characteristics, surgical indications and techniques, clinical and radiographic outcomes, and reoperation rates were collected and analyzed. RESULTS A systematic review of 24 studies involving 2496 patients was performed, assessing both open laminectomy and minimally invasive bilateral canal enlargement. Postoperative pain and functional outcomes were similar across the various studies, and postoperative radiographie instability was seen in 5.5% of patients. Instability was seen more frequently in patients with preexisting spondylolisthesis (12.6%) and in those treated with open laminectomy (12%). Reoperation for instability was required in 1.8% of all patients, and was higher for patients with preoperative spondylolisthesis (9.3%) and for those treated with open laminectomy (4.1%). CONCLUSIONS Instability following lumbar decompression is a common occurrence. This is particularly true if decompression alone is selected as a surgical approach in patients with established spondylolisthesis. This complication may occur less commonly with the use of minimally invasive techniques; however, larger prospective cohort studies are necessary to more thoroughly explore these findings.
目的 对于退行性腰椎管狭窄症,非融合减压是治疗神经源性间歇性跛行疼痛和功能障碍的有效方法。减压术后的医源性不稳定可能需要进一步干预以稳定脊柱。作者回顾了腰椎减压术后手术不稳定的发生率,并评估手术技术以及研究设计对不稳定发生率的影响。方法 进行全面的文献检索,以确定接受椎板切除术或微创减压且未行融合术治疗的退行性腰椎管狭窄症患者的手术队列,这些患者有无既往腰椎滑脱。收集并分析患者特征、手术指征和技术、临床和影像学结果以及再次手术率的数据。结果 对涉及2496例患者的24项研究进行了系统评价,评估了开放椎板切除术和微创双侧椎管扩大术。各研究中术后疼痛和功能结果相似,5.5%的患者出现术后影像学不稳定。既往有腰椎滑脱的患者(12.6%)和接受开放椎板切除术的患者(12%)中不稳定更为常见。所有患者中1.8%因不稳定需要再次手术,术前有腰椎滑脱的患者(9.3%)和接受开放椎板切除术的患者(4.1%)再次手术率更高。结论 腰椎减压术后不稳定很常见。对于已确诊腰椎滑脱的患者,如果仅选择减压作为手术方法,情况尤其如此。使用微创技术这种并发症可能较少发生;然而,需要更大规模的前瞻性队列研究来更全面地探讨这些发现。