Olson Nate W
Bioethics. 2016 Jun;30(5):317-24. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12212. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
In this article, I provide a new account of the basis of medical researchers' ancillary care obligations. Ancillary care in medical research, or medical care that research participants need but that is not required for the validity or safety of a study or to redress research injuries, is a topic that has drawn increasing attention in research ethics over the last ten years. My view, the relationship-based approach, improves on the main existing theory, Richardson and Belsky's 'partial-entrustment model', by avoiding its problematic restriction on the scope of health needs for which researchers could be obligated to provide ancillary care. Instead, it grounds ancillary care obligations in a wide range of morally relevant features of the researcher-participant relationship, including the level of engagement between researchers and participants, and weighs these factors against each other. I argue that the level of engagement, that is, the duration and intensity of interactions, between researchers and participants matters for ancillary care because of its connection to the meaningfulness of a relationship, and I suggest that other morally relevant features can be grounded in researchers' role obligations.
在本文中,我对医学研究人员的辅助护理义务的基础提出了一种新的解释。医学研究中的辅助护理,即研究参与者所需要的、但对于一项研究的有效性或安全性或弥补研究伤害并非必需的医疗护理,在过去十年里一直是研究伦理中越来越受关注的一个话题。我的观点,即基于关系的方法,改进了现有的主要理论,即理查森和贝尔斯基的“部分委托模型”,避免了该模型对研究人员可能有义务提供辅助护理的健康需求范围的有问题的限制。相反,它将辅助护理义务建立在研究人员与参与者关系的广泛道德相关特征之上,包括研究人员与参与者之间的参与程度,并权衡这些因素。我认为,研究人员与参与者之间的参与程度,即互动的持续时间和强度,对辅助护理很重要,因为它与关系的意义相关联,并且我认为其他道德相关特征可以基于研究人员的角色义务。