• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放科学能否推动健康公平?不断演变的数据共享格局下的基因组研究传播

Can Open Science Advance Health Justice? Genomic Research Dissemination in the Evolving Data-Sharing Landscape.

作者信息

Kraft Stephanie A, Mittendorf Kathleen F

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 Dec;54 Suppl 2:S73-S83. doi: 10.1002/hast.4932.

DOI:10.1002/hast.4932
PMID:39707953
Abstract

Scientific data-sharing and open science initiatives are increasingly important mechanisms for advancing the impact of genomic research. These mechanisms are being implemented as growing attention is paid to the need to improve the inclusion of research participants from marginalized and underrepresented groups. Together, these efforts aim to promote equitable advancements in genomic medicine. However, if not guided by community-informed protections, these efforts may harm the very participants and communities they aim to benefit. This essay examines potential benefits and harms of open science and explores how to advance a more just vision of open science in genomics. Drawing on relational ethics frameworks, we argue that researchers should consider their obligations to participants as well as the broader communities that are impacted by their research. We propose eight strategies to provide a foundation of practical steps for researchers to reduce the possibility of harms stemming from open science and to work toward genomic justice.

摘要

科学数据共享和开放科学倡议日益成为提升基因组研究影响力的重要机制。随着人们越来越关注改善来自边缘化和代表性不足群体的研究参与者的纳入情况,这些机制正在得到实施。这些努力共同旨在促进基因组医学的公平进步。然而,如果没有以社区知情保护为指导,这些努力可能会伤害到它们旨在造福的参与者和社区。本文探讨了开放科学的潜在益处和危害,并探索如何在基因组学领域推进更公正的开放科学愿景。借鉴关系伦理框架,我们认为研究人员应考虑他们对参与者以及受其研究影响的更广泛社区的义务。我们提出八项策略,为研究人员提供实际步骤的基础,以减少开放科学带来危害的可能性,并朝着基因组正义努力。

相似文献

1
Can Open Science Advance Health Justice? Genomic Research Dissemination in the Evolving Data-Sharing Landscape.开放科学能否推动健康公平?不断演变的数据共享格局下的基因组研究传播
Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 Dec;54 Suppl 2:S73-S83. doi: 10.1002/hast.4932.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Developing a contextually and culturally relevant benefit-sharing framework for pathogen genomic research and biobanking in africa: a deliberative expert approach.为非洲病原体基因组研究和生物样本库制定与背景和文化相关的利益分享框架:一种专家审议方法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 3;26(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01238-w.
4
Strengthening ethical oversight in genomics and biobanking: a retrospective analysis of research practices in Zimbabwe.加强基因组学和生物样本库中的伦理监督:津巴布韦研究实践的回顾性分析
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 9;26(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01257-7.
5
"I Don't Understand Their Sense of Belonging": Exploring How Nonbinary Autistic Adults Experience Gender.“我不理解他们的归属感”:探索非二元性别的自闭症成年人如何体验性别。
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):462-473. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0071. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Fabricating mice and dementia: opening up relations in multi-species research制造小鼠与痴呆症:开启多物种研究中的关联
7
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
10
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient care practices for LGBTQ+ individuals in clinical genetics: A scoping review.临床遗传学中针对LGBTQ+个体的患者护理实践:一项范围综述。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70022. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70022.
2
Navigating sexual orientation and gender identity data privacy concerns in United States genetics practices.在美国基因实践中应对性取向和性别认同数据隐私问题。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e70008. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70008.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing Privacy Vulnerabilities in Genetic Data Sets: Scoping Review.评估基因数据集的隐私漏洞:范围综述
JMIR Bioinform Biotechnol. 2024 May 27;5:e54332. doi: 10.2196/54332.
2
Conducting inclusive research in genetics for transgender, gender-diverse, and sex-diverse individuals: Case analyses and recommendations from a clinical genomics study.为跨性别者、性别多元者和性取向多元者开展包容性遗传学研究:一项临床基因组学研究的案例分析与建议
J Genet Couns. 2024 Aug;33(4):772-785. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1785. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
3
Equity Concerns Across Pediatric Research Recruitment: An Analysis of Research Staff Interviews.
儿科研究招募中的公平性问题:研究人员访谈分析
Acad Pediatr. 2024 Mar;24(2):318-329. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2023.06.032. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
4
Relational approaches in bioethics: A guide to their differences.生物伦理学中的关系方法:差异指南。
Bioethics. 2023 Oct;37(8):733-740. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13200. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
5
Exclusion of Families Who Speak Languages Other than English from Federally Funded Pediatric Trials.将讲英语以外语言的家庭排除在联邦资助的儿科试验之外。
J Pediatr. 2023 Nov;262:113597. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113597. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
6
Ethical research when abortion access is legally restricted.当堕胎合法受限时的伦理研究。
Science. 2023 Jun 23;380(6651):1224-1226. doi: 10.1126/science.adh3104. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
7
Addressing the ethical and societal challenges posed by genome-wide association studies of behavioral and brain-related traits.解决全基因组关联研究行为和大脑相关特征所带来的伦理和社会挑战。
Nat Neurosci. 2023 Jun;26(6):932-941. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01333-4. Epub 2023 May 22.
8
Wrestling with Social and Behavioral Genomics: Risks, Potential Benefits, and Ethical Responsibility.与社会和行为基因组学的博弈:风险、潜在利益和道德责任。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2023 Mar;53 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2-S49. doi: 10.1002/hast.1477.
9
Scientists with multiple NIH grants are overwhelmingly male and white.获得美国国立卫生研究院多项资助的科学家绝大多数是男性且为白人。
Nature. 2023 Apr 14. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-01297-2.
10
Correction to: Managing re-identification risks while providing access to the All of Us research program.对《在提供对“我们所有人”研究项目的访问权限时管理重新识别风险》的勘误
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Apr 19;30(5):1007. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad044.