• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用西尔伯格量表对减肥手术智能手机应用程序的信息质量进行分析。

Analysis of the Information Quality of Bariatric Surgery Smartphone Applications Using the Silberg Scale.

作者信息

Zhang Melvyn W B, Ho Roger C M, Hawa Raed, Sockalingam Sanjeev

机构信息

National Addictions Management Service, Institute of Mental Health, 10 Buangkok Green Medical Park, Singapore, 539747, Singapore.

Level 9, Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Tower Block, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Singapore.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2016 Jan;26(1):163-8. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1890-5.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-015-1890-5
PMID:26424704
Abstract

There is a paucity of literature that has evaluated the information quality of the current bariatric and obesity applications. Our objective was to evaluate the quality of currently available smartphone applications for bariatric-patient care using the Silberg scale. The two most widely used smartphone application online stores were searched in June 2014 and a total of 39 applications were evaluated. The average Silberg score of the 39 applications was 4.0 ± 1.76. The current gaps of information quality include the lack of provision of appropriate references, full disclosure of sponsorship, and accurate disclosure whether the application has been modified in the past month.

摘要

目前评估减肥和肥胖相关应用程序信息质量的文献较少。我们的目标是使用西尔伯格量表评估当前可用于减肥患者护理的智能手机应用程序的质量。2014年6月,我们搜索了两个使用最广泛的智能手机应用程序在线商店,共评估了39个应用程序。这39个应用程序的西尔伯格平均得分为4.0±1.76。当前信息质量的差距包括缺乏提供适当的参考文献、充分披露赞助情况以及准确披露该应用程序在过去一个月内是否被修改。

相似文献

1
Analysis of the Information Quality of Bariatric Surgery Smartphone Applications Using the Silberg Scale.使用西尔伯格量表对减肥手术智能手机应用程序的信息质量进行分析。
Obes Surg. 2016 Jan;26(1):163-8. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1890-5.
2
Current status of postnatal depression smartphone applications available on application stores: an information quality analysis.应用商店中产后抑郁智能手机应用程序的现状:信息质量分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 14;7(11):e015655. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015655.
3
A Contemporary Review of Smart Phone Applications in Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: an Underdeveloped Support Service.智能手机应用于减重与代谢外科的当代综述:一项尚不成熟的支持服务。
Obes Surg. 2023 Jun;33(6):1866-1875. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06566-7. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
4
Pilot implementation and user preferences of a Bariatric After-care application.减肥术后护理应用程序的试点实施及用户偏好
Technol Health Care. 2015;23(6):729-36. doi: 10.3233/THC-151025.
5
Current Status of Cardiovascular Disease-Related Smartphone Apps Downloadable in China.中国可下载的心血管疾病相关智能手机应用程序的现状
Telemed J E Health. 2017 Mar;23(3):219-225. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0083. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
6
Online and smartphone based cognitive behavioral therapy for bariatric surgery patients: Initial pilot study.针对减肥手术患者的在线及基于智能手机的认知行为疗法:初步试点研究。
Technol Health Care. 2015;23(6):737-44. doi: 10.3233/THC-151026.
7
Nutritional monitoring of patients post-bariatric surgery: implications for smartphone applications.患者减重手术后的营养监测:对智能手机应用的影响。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2018 Feb;31(1):141-148. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12492. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
8
Feasibility of Smartphone-Based Education Modules and Ecological Momentary Assessment/Intervention in Pre-bariatric Surgery Patients.基于智能手机的教育模块以及对肥胖症手术前患者进行生态瞬时评估/干预的可行性。
Obes Surg. 2015 Oct;25(10):1875-81. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1617-7.
9
Analysis of the information quality of korean obesity-management smartphone applications.韩国肥胖管理智能手机应用程序的信息质量分析
Healthc Inform Res. 2014 Jan;20(1):23-9. doi: 10.4258/hir.2014.20.1.23. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
10
The `WikiGuidelines' smartphone application: Bridging the gaps in availability of evidence-based smartphone mental health applications.“维基指南”智能手机应用程序:弥合循证智能手机心理健康应用程序可用性方面的差距。
Technol Health Care. 2016 Jul 27;24(4):587-90. doi: 10.3233/THC-161141.

引用本文的文献

1
The Utilisation of Digital Applications for Measuring Patient Outcomes Following Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.减肥手术后测量患者结局的数字应用程序的使用:比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Obes Surg. 2024 Feb;34(2):635-642. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-07000-8. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
2
Current challenges for evaluating mobile health applications.评估移动健康应用程序的当前挑战。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Feb 16;30(3):617-624. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac244.
3
Evaluating the quality, utility, and reliability of the information in uveitis videos shared on YouTube.

本文引用的文献

1
Enabling Psychiatrists to be Mobile Phone App Developers: Insights Into App Development Methodologies.使精神科医生能够成为手机应用程序开发者:应用程序开发方法的见解。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Nov 11;2(4):e53. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3425.
2
Web-site evaluation tools: a case study in reproductive health information.网站评估工具:生殖健康信息案例研究
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:895-9.
3
Analysis of the information quality of korean obesity-management smartphone applications.韩国肥胖管理智能手机应用程序的信息质量分析
评估在YouTube上分享的葡萄膜炎视频中信息的质量、实用性和可靠性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;43(2):549-555. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02454-8. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
4
Mobile Health Apps That Act as Surgical Preparatory Guides: App Store Search and Quality Evaluation.作为手术准备指南的移动健康应用程序:应用商店搜索与质量评估
JMIR Perioper Med. 2021 Nov 30;4(2):e27037. doi: 10.2196/27037.
5
A systematic review of smartphone apps for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: the need for regulation and medical professional involvement.一项关于胃食管反流病智能手机应用程序的系统评价:监管及医学专业人员参与的必要性
Mhealth. 2021 Oct 20;7:56. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-20-126. eCollection 2021.
6
Identification and Evaluation of Methodologies to Assess the Quality of Mobile Health Apps in High-, Low-, and Middle-Income Countries: Rapid Review.在高、中、低收入国家中评估移动健康应用程序质量的方法的识别和评估:快速综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Oct 12;9(10):e28384. doi: 10.2196/28384.
7
When Public Health Research Meets Social Media: Knowledge Mapping From 2000 to 2018.当公共卫生研究遇到社交媒体:2000 年至 2018 年的知识图谱
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 13;22(8):e17582. doi: 10.2196/17582.
8
The current status of stroke-related smartphone applications available to adopt in China: A systematic review study.中国可供采用的与中风相关的智能手机应用程序的现状:一项系统评价研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 2;99(27):e20656. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020656.
9
Application and effectiveness of eHealth strategies for metabolic and bariatric surgery patients: A systematic review.电子健康策略在代谢与减重手术患者中的应用及效果:一项系统综述
Digit Health. 2020 Jan 7;6:2055207619898987. doi: 10.1177/2055207619898987. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
10
Safety concerns with consumer-facing mobile health applications and their consequences: a scoping review.面向消费者的移动健康应用程序的安全问题及其后果:范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Feb 1;27(2):330-340. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz175.
Healthc Inform Res. 2014 Jan;20(1):23-9. doi: 10.4258/hir.2014.20.1.23. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
4
Obesity surgery smartphone apps: a review.肥胖手术智能手机应用程序:综述。
Obes Surg. 2014 Jan;24(1):32-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1010-3.
5
Smartphone apps to support hospital prescribing and pharmacology education: a review of current provision.支持医院处方开具和药理学教育的智能手机应用程序:当前应用情况综述
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jan;77(1):31-8. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12112.
6
Smartphone and medical related App use among medical students and junior doctors in the United Kingdom (UK): a regional survey.英国医学生和初级医生对智能手机和医疗相关应用程序的使用情况:一项区域性调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Oct 30;12:121. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-121.
7
Psychopathology before surgery in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery-3 (LABS-3) psychosocial study.手术前的精神病理学:肥胖症手术纵向评估-3(LABS-3)心理社会研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 Sep-Oct;8(5):533-41. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2012.07.001. Epub 2012 Jul 14.
8
Smartphone applications for the urology trainee.适用于泌尿外科实习医生的智能手机应用程序。
BJU Int. 2011 Nov;108(9):1371-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10640.x.
9
Adult obesity prevalence in Canada and the United States.加拿大和美国的成人肥胖患病率。
NCHS Data Brief. 2011 Mar(56):1-8.
10
Quality of Web-based information on depression.基于网络的抑郁症信息质量。
Depress Anxiety. 2010 Sep;27(9):852-8. doi: 10.1002/da.20665.