Beier Suzane L, Mattoso Cláudio R S, Aguiar Antonio J A, Vianna Pedro T G, Massone Flavio
Department of Clinical and Veterinary Surgery, School of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil (Beier); Department of Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Agricultural and Animal Sciences, Santa Catarina State University, Lages, Santa Catarina, Brazil (Mattoso); Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, (Aguiar, Massone), and Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil (Vianna).
Can J Vet Res. 2015 Oct;79(4):309-15.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol alone or in combination with a constant-rate infusion (CRI) of remifentanil. Six adult dogs were given 2 treatments in a randomized crossover study with a 7-day interval between treatments. Treatment 1 was propofol (P) and treatment 2 was propofol and remifentanil (P-Rem), without any premedication. Propofol was induced using a TCI system with a predicted plasma concentration (Cp) of 6.0 μg/mL. Anesthesia was maintained within the Cp range (0.65 to 3.0 μg/mL) for 120 min and remifentanil was administered at a rate of 0.3 μg/kg body weight (BW) per minute, CRI. Cardiopulmonary variables were recorded before (baseline), during, and 120 min after drug administration. Heart rate (HR) decreased significantly in the P-Rem group (46%) compared with baseline values. In the P-Rem group, the cardiac index (CI) decreased significantly (49% to 58%) and the stroke volume (SV) decreased compared with baseline values. The systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) increased significantly in the P-Rem group compared with baseline values. There was no difference in mean arterial pressure (MAP) between the groups. Central venous pressure (CVP) and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) significantly increased in the P-Rem group compared with baseline values. In conclusion, the hemodynamic changes observed in this study indicate a compromise of the cardiovascular system, although the dogs in this study were healthy/euvolemic and there was no change in preload. More studies are required in order to evaluate the actual safety of the combination of propofol and remifentanil in patients with reduced cardiac reserve.
本研究的目的是评估单独靶控输注(TCI)丙泊酚或丙泊酚与瑞芬太尼持续输注(CRI)联合应用时的血流动力学效应。在一项随机交叉研究中,对6只成年犬进行了2种处理,处理间隔为7天。处理1为丙泊酚(P),处理2为丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼(P-Rem),均未进行任何术前用药。使用TCI系统诱导丙泊酚,预测血浆浓度(Cp)为6.0μg/mL。在Cp范围(0.65至3.0μg/mL)内维持麻醉120分钟,瑞芬太尼以每分钟0.3μg/kg体重(BW)的速率进行CRI给药。记录给药前(基线)、给药期间和给药后120分钟的心肺变量。与基线值相比,P-Rem组心率(HR)显著降低(46%)。在P-Rem组中,心脏指数(CI)显著降低(49%至58%),每搏量(SV)与基线值相比降低。与基线值相比,P-Rem组全身血管阻力指数(SVRI)显著升高。两组间平均动脉压(MAP)无差异。与基线值相比,P-Rem组中心静脉压(CVP)和肺动脉闭塞压(PAOP)显著升高。总之,本研究中观察到的血流动力学变化表明心血管系统受到损害,尽管本研究中的犬健康/血容量正常且前负荷无变化。为了评估丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼联合应用于心脏储备功能降低患者的实际安全性,还需要更多的研究。