Dallas G, Paradisis G, Kirialanis P, Mellos V, Argitaki P, Smirniotou A
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Greece.
Democritus University of Thrace, Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Greece.
Biol Sport. 2015 Sep;32(3):235-41. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1163373. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
The purpose of this study was to examine the acute effects of different vibration loads (frequency and amplitude) of whole-body vibration (WBV) on flexibility and explosive strength of lower limbs in springboard divers. Eighteen male and female divers, aged 19 ± 2 years, volunteered to perform 3 different WBV protocols in the present study. To assess the vibration effect, flexibility and explosive strength of lower limbs were measured before (Pre), immediately after (Post 1) and 15 min after the end of vibration exposure (Post 15). Three protocols with different frequencies and amplitudes were used in the present study: a) low vibration frequency and amplitude (30 Hz/2 mm); b) high vibration frequency and amplitude (50 Hz/4 mm); c) a control protocol (no vibration). WBV protocols were performed on a Power Plate platform, whereas the no vibration divers performed the same protocol but with the vibration platform turned off. A two-way ANOVA 3 x 3 (protocol × time) with repeated measures on both factors was used. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Univariate analyses with simple contrasts across time were selected as post hoc tests. Intraclass coefficients (ICC) were used to assess the reliability across time. The results indicated that flexibility and explosive strength of lower limbs were significantly higher in both WBV protocols compared to the no vibration group (NVG). The greatest improvement in flexibility and explosive strength, which occurred immediately after vibration treatment, was maintained 15 min later in both WBV protocols, whereas NVG revealed a significant decrease 15 min later, in all examined strength parameters. In conclusion, a bout of WBV significantly increased flexibility and explosive strength in competitive divers compared with the NVG. Therefore, it is recommended to incorporate WBV as a method to increase flexibility and vertical jump height in sports where these parameters play an important role in the success outcome of these sports.
本研究旨在探讨全身振动(WBV)不同振动负荷(频率和振幅)对跳板跳水运动员下肢柔韧性和爆发力的急性影响。18名年龄在19±2岁的男女跳水运动员自愿参与本研究,进行3种不同的WBV方案。为评估振动效果,在振动暴露前(Pre)、结束后即刻(Post 1)和结束后15分钟(Post 15)测量下肢的柔韧性和爆发力。本研究采用了3种不同频率和振幅的方案:a)低振动频率和振幅(30Hz/2mm);b)高振动频率和振幅(50Hz/4mm);c)对照方案(无振动)。WBV方案在Power Plate平台上进行,而无振动的跳水运动员执行相同方案,但振动平台关闭。使用双因素方差分析3×3(方案×时间),两个因素均进行重复测量。显著性水平设定为p<0.05。选择跨时间的简单对比进行单变量分析作为事后检验。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估跨时间的可靠性。结果表明,与无振动组(NVG)相比,两种WBV方案中下肢的柔韧性和爆发力均显著更高。振动处理后即刻出现的柔韧性和爆发力的最大改善在两种WBV方案中在15分钟后仍得以保持,而NVG在所有检查的力量参数方面在15分钟后均出现显著下降。总之,与NVG相比,一次WBV显著提高了竞技跳水运动员的柔韧性和爆发力。因此,建议将WBV作为一种方法,在这些参数对运动成功结果起重要作用的运动中提高柔韧性和垂直跳跃高度。