Lim Jae-Heon, Park Chi-Bok, Kim Byeong-Geun
Department of Physical Therapy, Wonkwang Health Science University, Iksan, Korea.
Department of Physical Therapy, Somoonnan Orthopedic Clinic, Gwangju, Korea.
J Exerc Rehabil. 2019 Aug 28;15(4):560-565. doi: 10.12965/jer.1938238.119. eCollection 2019 Aug.
This study investigates the effect of vibration foam roller (VFR) applied to the hamstring, on the quadriceps electromyography (EMG) activity and hamstring flexibility. A total of 16 subjects were randomly assigned to either the VFR group (n=8) or the nonvibration foam roller group (NVFR, n=8). The two groups applied the foam roller or the VFR to the dominant hamstring, at a rate of 40 times per min, for a total of 200 times in 5 min. The primary outcome was to measure hamstring extensibility using the sit and reach test. The EMG activity of the dominant rectus femoris (RF), vastus lateralis (VL), and vastus medialis (VM) was measured as the secondary outcome. Results indicate a significant increase in the sit and reach distance after the intervention in both groups, as compared to preintervention. The sit and reach difference between VFR and NVFR show no significant difference after the intervention. Significant increases were observed after intervention in the %maximum voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC) of VL, VM, and RF in the VFR group, and RF in the NVFR group, as compared to the preintervention values. Furthermore, %MVIC values of VL and RF, but not the VM muscle, were significantly different between the two groups. These findings suggest that regardless of vibration, the application of foam roller to hamstring may exert a positive effect on hamstring flexibility. Furthermore, these results indicate that the application of foam roller with vibrations causes more EMG activation in the antagonists.
本研究调查了振动泡沫轴(VFR)作用于腘绳肌对股四头肌肌电图(EMG)活动及腘绳肌柔韧性的影响。共有16名受试者被随机分为VFR组(n = 8)或非振动泡沫轴组(NVFR,n = 8)。两组均以每分钟40次的频率,将泡沫轴或VFR应用于优势腘绳肌,5分钟内共进行200次。主要结局指标是使用坐位体前屈测试来测量腘绳肌伸展性。测量优势股直肌(RF)、股外侧肌(VL)和股内侧肌(VM)的EMG活动作为次要结局指标。结果表明,与干预前相比,两组干预后坐位体前屈距离均显著增加。干预后,VFR组和NVFR组之间的坐位体前屈差异无显著意义。与干预前值相比,VFR组的VL、VM和RF以及NVFR组的RF在干预后的最大自主等长收缩百分比(%MVIC)均显著增加。此外,两组之间VL和RF的%MVIC值存在显著差异,但VM肌肉无显著差异。这些发现表明,无论是否振动,将泡沫轴应用于腘绳肌可能对腘绳肌柔韧性产生积极影响。此外,这些结果表明,使用振动泡沫轴会使拮抗肌的EMG激活更多。