Lima Brian, Chamogeorgakis Themistokles, Mountis Maria, Gonzalez-Stawinski Gonzalo V
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas (Lima, Chamogeorgakis), and the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (Mountis, Gonzalez-Stawinski). Dr. Gonzalez-Stawinski is now affiliated with Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas.
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2015 Oct;28(4):454-6. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2015.11929306.
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation has become a mainstay of therapy for advanced heart failure patients who are either ineligible for, or awaiting, cardiac transplantation. Controversy remains over the optimal therapeutic strategy for preexisting aortic valvular dysfunction in these patients at the time of LVAD implant. In patients with moderate to severe aortic regurgitation, surgical approaches are center specific and range from variable leaflet closure techniques to concomitant aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a bioprosthesis. In the present study, we retrospectively analyzed our outcomes in patients who underwent simultaneous AVR and LVAD implantation secondary to antecedent aortic valve pathology. Between January 2004 and June 2010, 144 patients underwent LVAD implantation at a single institution. Of these, 7 patients (4.8%) required concomitant AVR. Five of the 7 patients (71%) survived to hospital discharge and suffered no adverse events in the perioperative period. One-year survival for the discharged patients was 80%, and no prosthetic valve-related adverse events were observed in long-term follow-up. Given our experience, we conclude that bioprosthetic AVR is a plausible alternative for end-stage heart failure patients at the time of LVAD implantation.
左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入已成为晚期心力衰竭患者治疗的主要手段,这些患者要么不符合心脏移植条件,要么正在等待心脏移植。对于这些患者在植入LVAD时已存在的主动脉瓣功能障碍的最佳治疗策略仍存在争议。对于中重度主动脉瓣反流患者,手术方法因中心而异,范围从各种瓣叶闭合技术到同期使用生物假体进行主动脉瓣置换(AVR)。在本研究中,我们回顾性分析了因先前存在的主动脉瓣病变而同期进行AVR和LVAD植入的患者的治疗结果。2004年1月至2010年6月期间,144例患者在单一机构接受了LVAD植入。其中,7例患者(4.8%)需要同期进行AVR。7例患者中有5例(71%)存活至出院,围手术期未发生不良事件。出院患者的1年生存率为80%,长期随访中未观察到与人工瓣膜相关的不良事件。根据我们的经验,我们得出结论,对于终末期心力衰竭患者,在植入LVAD时,生物假体AVR是一种可行的替代方案。