Ellera Gomes João L, Leie Murilo A, Ramirez Eric, Gomes Trajano E
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Clin J Sport Med. 2016 May;26(3):216-20. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000237.
To determine the sensitivity and specificity of a new clinical test for the diagnosis of injuries to the posterolateral corner of the knee by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the reference standard.
Diagnostic accuracy study.
A tertiary care teaching hospital.
Twelve subjects with chronic instability of the knee and posterolateral corner injury diagnosed by intraoperative findings and 9 subjects without posterolateral corner injury (used as controls).
Injured and uninjured knees were assessed blindly by 2 examiners using a new clinical diagnostic test (the frog-leg test) and the classic varus stress test.
Injuries to the posterolateral corner of the knee identified by the 2 clinical tests. Findings were compared and examined for reproducibility, and kappa statistic was used to assess interobserver agreement. Test results were compared with those of MRI and intraoperative findings to determine diagnostic accuracy.
The frog-leg test showed high interobserver agreement (kappa, 0.86), with a high rate (83%-100%) of agreement with the intraoperative diagnosis. The frog-leg test had high sensitivity (91.7%) and specificity (94.5%) for detecting posterolateral corner injuries. The sensitivity of the varus stress test increased from 83.3% to 90.0% when combined with the frog-leg test.
Examiners were able to identify posterolateral corner injuries and differentiate injured from uninjured knees using the frog-leg test, which could potentially be used as an ancillary tool to the varus stress test in diagnosing injuries to the posterolateral corner of the knee. Larger studies are needed to confirm our findings.
以磁共振成像(MRI)作为参考标准,确定一种用于诊断膝关节后外侧角损伤的新临床测试的敏感性和特异性。
诊断准确性研究。
一家三级护理教学医院。
12名经术中发现诊断为膝关节慢性不稳定和后外侧角损伤的受试者,以及9名无后外侧角损伤的受试者(用作对照)。
两名检查者对受伤和未受伤的膝关节进行盲法评估,使用一种新的临床诊断测试(蛙腿试验)和经典的内翻应力试验。
两种临床测试所确定的膝关节后外侧角损伤情况。对结果进行比较并检查其可重复性,使用kappa统计量评估观察者间的一致性。将测试结果与MRI和术中发现的结果进行比较,以确定诊断准确性。
蛙腿试验显示观察者间一致性较高(kappa值为0.86),与术中诊断的一致性率较高(83%-100%)。蛙腿试验对检测后外侧角损伤具有较高的敏感性(91.7%)和特异性(94.5%)。内翻应力试验与蛙腿试验联合使用时,其敏感性从83.3%提高到90.0%。
检查者能够使用蛙腿试验识别后外侧角损伤,并区分受伤和未受伤的膝关节,蛙腿试验有可能作为内翻应力试验的辅助工具,用于诊断膝关节后外侧角损伤。需要进行更大规模的研究来证实我们的发现。