Kerr Darcy A, Arora Kshitij S, Mahadevan Krishnan K, Hornick Jason L, Krane Jeffrey F, Rivera Miguel N, Ting David T, Deshpande Vikram, Faquin William C
Departments of *Pathology ‡Surgery ∥Tucker Gosnell Center for Gastrointestinal Cancers, Massachusetts General Hospital §Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital †Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Dec;39(12):1643-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000516.
High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) is a major etiologic agent in a subset of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs), and its recognition has prognostic and predictive implications. The availability of a sensitive and specific test to assess HR-HPV status is limited. We evaluate an RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) method using branch chain technology to detect HR-HPV and compare its results with DNA ISH, p16 immunohistochemistry, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Tissue sections from 54 patients were stained with a manual RNA ISH assay (ViewRNA), which detects 14 HR-HPV types, an automated DNA ISH assay, and p16 immunohistochemistry. Most cases (83%, n=45) were also tested on an automated platform for 14 HR-HPV types and 1 limited to HPV 16/18. PCR was performed in all cases and was successful in 93% (n=50). The RNA ISH assay produced results in 96% of the cases with strong signals and was easily interpreted. HR-HPV was detected in more cases (63%, n=34) by RNA ISH than by DNA ISH (39%, n=21). Compared with PCR, both ISH platforms were 94% specific. RNA ISH was more sensitive (91%) than DNA ISH (65%), and RNA ISH correlated more strongly with p16 immunostaining. HPV 16 represented 89% of HR-HPV detected. The cocktail HPV 16/18 platform was concordant with the pooled HR-HPV assay in all expected cases. The automated assay demonstrated high concordance (96%) with the manual version, showed decreased background, and should allow for easy implementation into the workflow of the diagnostic pathology laboratory.
高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HR-HPV)是一部分头颈鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)的主要病因,对其的识别具有预后和预测意义。用于评估HR-HPV状态的敏感且特异的检测方法有限。我们评估了一种使用分支链技术检测HR-HPV的RNA原位杂交(ISH)方法,并将其结果与DNA ISH、p16免疫组织化学和聚合酶链反应(PCR)进行比较。对54例患者的组织切片进行了手动RNA ISH检测(ViewRNA),该检测可检测14种HR-HPV类型,同时还进行了自动DNA ISH检测和p16免疫组织化学检测。大多数病例(83%,n=45)还在自动平台上检测了14种HR-HPV类型以及1种限于HPV 16/18的类型。所有病例均进行了PCR检测,93%(n=50)检测成功。RNA ISH检测在96%的病例中产生了强信号结果,且易于解读。RNA ISH检测出的HR-HPV阳性病例(63%,n=34)多于DNA ISH检测(39%,n=21)。与PCR相比,两种ISH平台的特异性均为94%。RNA ISH比DNA ISH更敏感(91%比65%),且RNA ISH与p16免疫染色的相关性更强。检测到的HR-HPV中89%为HPV 16。在所有预期病例中,HPV 16/18混合平台与汇总的HR-HPV检测结果一致。自动检测与手动检测显示出高度一致性(96%),背景降低,且应便于在诊断病理实验室的工作流程中实施。