Keane Páraic M, Poynton Fergus E, Hall James P, Clark Ian P, Sazanovich Igor V, Towrie Michael, Gunnlaugsson Thorfinnur, Quinn Susan J, Cardin Christine J, Kelly John M
School of Chemistry, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Dept. of Chemistry, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AD, UK.
Faraday Discuss. 2015;185:455-69. doi: 10.1039/c5fd00085h.
The intercalating Ru(TAP)2(dppz) complex can photo-oxidise guanine in DNA, although in mixed-sequence DNA it can be difficult to understand the precise mechanism due to uncertainties in where and how the complex is bound. Replacement of guanine with the less oxidisable inosine (I) base can be used to understand the mechanism of electron transfer (ET). Here the ET has been compared for both Λ- and Δ-enantiomers of Ru(TAP)2(dppz) in a set of sequences where guanines in the readily oxidisable GG step in {TCGGCGCCGA}2 have been replaced with I. The ET has been monitored using picosecond and nanosecond transient absorption and picosecond time-resolved IR spectroscopy. In both cases inosine replacement leads to a diminished yield, but the trends are strikingly different for Λ- and Δ-complexes.
插入型[Ru(TAP)₂(dppz)]²⁺配合物能够对DNA中的鸟嘌呤进行光氧化,不过在混合序列DNA中,由于该配合物结合位置及方式存在不确定性,精确的作用机制难以明确。用氧化性较弱的肌苷(I)碱基取代鸟嘌呤,可用于理解电子转移(ET)机制。在此,针对[Ru(TAP)₂(dppz)]²⁺的Λ-和Δ-对映体,在{TCGGCGCCGA}₂中易于氧化的GG步中的鸟嘌呤已被I取代的一组序列中比较了电子转移情况。已使用皮秒和纳秒瞬态吸收以及皮秒时间分辨红外光谱对电子转移进行了监测。在这两种情况下,肌苷取代都会导致产率降低,但对于Λ-和Δ-配合物,趋势明显不同。