Eddy Christopher, Sase Eriko
J Environ Health. 2015 Jul-Aug;78(1):26-32.
The objective of this article was to examine the environmental health implications of the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster from an all-hazards perspective. The authors performed a literature review that included Japanese and international nuclear guidance and policy, scientific papers, and reports on the Chernobyl and Three Mile Island disasters while also considering all-hazards preparedness rubrics in the U.S. The examination of the literature resulted in the following: a) the authors' "All-Hazards Planning Reference Model" that distinguishes three planning categories-Disaster Trigger Event, Man-Made Hazards, and Vulnerability Factors; b) the generalization of their model to other countries; and c) advocacy for environmental health end fate to be considered in planning phases to minimize risk to environmental health. This article discusses inconsistencies in disaster planning and nomenclature existing in the studied materials and international guidance and proposes new opportunity for developing predisaster risk assessment, risk communication, and prevention capacity building.
本文的目的是从全灾种视角审视2011年福岛核灾难对环境健康的影响。作者进行了文献综述,内容包括日本和国际核指导与政策、科学论文以及关于切尔诺贝利和三里岛灾难的报告,同时还考虑了美国的全灾种备灾准则。文献审查得出以下结果:a) 作者的“全灾种规划参考模型”,该模型区分了三个规划类别——灾害触发事件、人为灾害和脆弱性因素;b) 将其模型推广到其他国家;c) 主张在规划阶段考虑环境健康最终结果,以将对环境健康的风险降至最低。本文讨论了研究材料和国际指导中存在的灾害规划和术语不一致问题,并提出了开展灾前风险评估、风险沟通和预防能力建设的新机遇。