Daubert Jean-Claude, Behaghel Albin, Leclercq Christophe, Mabo Philippe
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2014 Mar;198(3):473-87; discussion 487-8.
Major improvements in implantable electrical cardiac devices have been made during the last two decades, notably with the advent of automatic internal defibrillation (ICD) to prevent sudden arrhythmic death, and cardiac resynchronisation (CRT) to treat the discoordinated failing heart. They now constitute a major therapeutic option and may eventually supersede drug therapy. The coming era will be marked by a technological revolution, with improvements in treatment delivery, safety and efficacy, and an expansion of clinical indications. Leadless technologyfor cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators is already in the pipeline, endovascular leads currently being responsible for most long-term complications (lead failure, infection, vein thrombosis, etc.). Miniaturized pacemakers based on nanotechnology can now be totally implanted inside the right ventricle through the transvenous route, thus eliminating leads, pockets and scarring In the same way, totally subcutaneous ICD systems are now available, although they are currently only capable of delivering shocks, without pacing (including antitachycardia pacing). In CRT optimised delivery is important to improve clinical responses and to reduce the non-response rate (around 30 % with current technology). Endocardial left ventricular pacing could be a solution if it can be achieved at an acceptable risk. Multisite ventricular pacing is an alternative. Besides CRT neuromodulation, especially by vagal stimulation, is another important field of device researchfor heart failure. Preliminary clinical results are encouraging.
在过去二十年中,植入式心脏电子设备取得了重大进展,尤其是自动体内除颤(ICD)的出现,用于预防心律失常性猝死,以及心脏再同步治疗(CRT),用于治疗不协调的衰竭心脏。它们现在构成了一种主要的治疗选择,最终可能会取代药物治疗。未来的时代将以技术革命为标志,在治疗输送、安全性和有效性方面会有所改进,临床适应症也会扩大。心脏起搏器和除颤器的无导线技术已在研发中,目前血管内导线是大多数长期并发症(导线故障、感染、静脉血栓形成等)的原因。基于纳米技术的微型起搏器现在可以通过静脉途径完全植入右心室内,从而消除导线、囊袋和瘢痕。同样,完全皮下ICD系统现在也已可用,尽管它们目前仅能进行电击,不能起搏(包括抗心动过速起搏)。在CRT中,优化输送对于改善临床反应和降低无反应率(当前技术约为30%)很重要。如果能在可接受的风险下实现心内膜左心室起搏,可能是一种解决方案。多部位心室起搏是一种替代方法。除了CRT,神经调节,尤其是通过迷走神经刺激,是心力衰竭设备研究的另一个重要领域。初步临床结果令人鼓舞。